![]() |
|
|
#43 |
|
KMK
Drives: Slow V6 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: kuwait
Posts: 497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
13.453 @ 101.90
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Rally Yellow Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Pa.
Posts: 1,877
|
Not me but looking forward to the ZL1 vs *insert supercar* threads.
...........
__________________
GMPP exhaust/JBA shorties/Vararam CAI/VMax TB/SLP Pulley/VMax IM isolator/MACE Ported IM +Plenum Spacer/IPF Tuned |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro IBM LT2/RS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 5
|
Stop modding your V6 and just trade it in for the V8
Can't, because of one simple undeniable fact...Insurance!!! You guys forget that in some state V8 automatically puts you into sport car insurance. In Nevada, (****Disclaimer****It is not like this anywhere else) it would cost me $405 usd to carry full coverage on a 2010 camaro 1ss. I currently pay $162.50 USD on my 2010 V6 2LT/RS. My car retailed for around 31,000 with options, about the same price as a 1ss with nothing extra. Lets do a little math; before I would have paid off the car I would have spent $14,550 more in insurance by owning a Camaro SS. ((405-162.50)*60). Food for thought next time you go bashing a V6 owner...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() Drives: 2014 2SS/RS BRM Purchase 03/19/2014 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 538
|
Lets see base LS $22K + - a few hundred, Base SS $30K + - a few hundred. 5-7K for a turbo or SC set up = same ETs and performance as quick as a stock LS3 V8 (or maybe quicker) minus higher insurance and getting better MPG with gas prices getting higher. Hummmm........ You decide?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Retired
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
|
Its cheap and it looks cool. What more can you ask for. Sup fellers. B back soon as Im no longer homeless. Living out of my Camaro right now. Could be worse. Could be living out of a Mustang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
13.453 @ 101.90
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Rally Yellow Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Pa.
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
__________________
GMPP exhaust/JBA shorties/Vararam CAI/VMax TB/SLP Pulley/VMax IM isolator/MACE Ported IM +Plenum Spacer/IPF Tuned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() Drives: Previous Camaros: 69, 89, 11, 13 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 136
|
In a year or two, once the aftermarket comes around and the TT kits are fully sorted out, the LS will be the bang for the buck winner over the SS in the right power ranges. I paid just over 20K for mine, and have seen them advertised for under 20K as of late. That gives the V6 owner a good $8K to spend just to get to the price of a Base SS. That will cover the Turbo kit and tuning. The SS owner is going to have to add a turbo/ maggie/ KB, etc, for pretty much the same money to stay ahead. For another $8K, the LS owner will be able to reinforce the engine internals, and the drivetrain, and be king in the 600-700 HP bracket (i'm talking reliably, not blowing up drivetrain parts every other launch), while retaining better weight distribution and lighter weight with the mid mounts over the sc'd V8 cars. If you factor in the drivetrain upgrades to the SS, there goes another few grand, depending on power level, that the V6 has saved over the V8. In the bolt-on only categories, yes the SS will have the advantage, but the LLT is going to have it's niche once the aftermarket comes around. If you are talking buying and modding used cars, I'm willing to bet the V6's are going to depreciate faster, making them an even better deal for someone looking to mod. I have seen plenty of SS owners that have spent double what I have on my car on theirs, are you telling me that for 20-30K in upgrades a V6 car couldn't be built to run?
That being said, yes, if you are building and buying for out of the box performance, the SS is going to be king, no one is having any delusions about that, the SS is an outstanding car. The LSx series of engines has been continuously developed and improved for over a decade. It is a great platform with lots of cost effective mods and great power potential. For people looking to build four digit power, yes, it will remain king. But at that level, most V8 guys aren't using any factory engine or drivetrain parts... and have spent more on mods than I did on my entire car. But to completely dismiss the LLT simply because it is a V6 is just plain ignorant, once this engine begins to reach its potential there are going to be a lot of surprised, and probably even a few angry, V8 owners out there. I used to be a die-hard V8 or nothing guy too, but driving the LLT opened my eyes. Unless the CAFE regulations get drastically modified, which is unlikely to happen, the V6 is going to be part of the future of Camaro performance, with the exception of the top dog models like ZL1, assuming they remain profitable enough to remain on the market a decade from now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
This is the logic behind my LS project.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2LT RS in Red Jewel Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 463
|
Hmm, I'd put a V6 up against about 80% of the cars currently on the market. I suppose it depends on what your defininition of performance is.
300+HP from a V6 is not only great performance, it's wrapped in one of the sexiest packages on the market right now.
__________________
Yes, this is my Camaro parked in front of the Infiniti Dealership that I run. No, my boss is not happy...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 VW R32, 2011 Synergy Green 2SS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Randolph, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,544
|
I got the SS because I want a powerful and fun car for weekends. The V-6 is in no way a slow car, heck if I could afford it and I could drive it everyday in the winter I would love to have the V-6 as a daily driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
on another note. if i bought a 2008 350z for 20k and put the amount of money you said to put into a v6 camaro. the 350z would be faster every time only because it weighs less. allot of you v6 owners think us v8 guys think down on you because its a v6 when that it not true at all. GM made a great engine with 312 HP. but the car weighs allot a 2011 bmw 335i has a twin turbo v6 with 300HP. and your v6 has 312. the engine is not the problem clearly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,367
|
Quote:
This is due to the new cafe standards coming out in a few years, and the whole team was saying " what do you think about turbo v6's for the future?" I think we know the direction were all headed and I dont see everyone paying $50000 or whatever for v8's like theZL1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
![]() Drives: Previous Camaros: 69, 89, 11, 13 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 136
|
I agree, the biggest problem with the Camaro, and modern cars in general, is the weight gain from all of the safety features and comfort options now standard on every vehicle produced.
Hopefully, this will be addressed when the gen 6 with the Alpha platform comes to market. When the 4th Gen was released, everyone raved about the car, but complained about the weight gain over the 3rd gen. When the 5th gen was released, it happened again. Hopefully the 6th gen will remain closer to the weight of it's competition. Weight is the main advantage that many cars, including the Mustang and Z, have over the Gen 5. That being said, the 5th gen does an outstanding job of hiding its weight when you are behind the wheel. Prior to the release of the Gen 5, the Camaro would NEVER have been compared to a BMW 3-series, or Infinity G35/37, or any luxury sport coupe, they were a V8 muscle car or a V6 poser. Now it has become a legitimate competitor to cars in several sales categories and markets. I didn't buy my LS because it was a street fighter muscle car, I bought it because I see it as a low option CTS coupe at half to 2/3 the price. I think todays HP wars are going to start to draw to a close, just like they did in the early 70's. In todays political and economical environment, it is getting tougher and tougher to justify 400+ HP to the non-enthusiast driver, regardless of how economical and emissions/ environmentally friendly they have become. The focus is going to shift to further improving economy and reducing vehicle weight, while keeping performance at the levels they have currently reached. We will see the V8's shrink in displacement, while keeping close to current power output, with smaller displacements and or forced induction becoming much more popular across the board. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,367
|
Quote:
My 83 z28 was 3250 lbs= weak body structure, was like a noddle my 98 z28 is 3450 lbs= 30% stronger body, getting there my 10 lt is about 3800? strongest, safest and rattle free |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Saab's Future Secured | moto-camaro | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 5 | 02-23-2010 05:44 PM |
| GM CEO says future of Corvette secure | camaro5 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 12 | 05-07-2009 08:08 AM |
| New York Times: Siphoning G.M.’s Future | GTAHVIT | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 2 | 07-10-2008 07:37 PM |
| Steve Dinan: BMW sets the tone for future combustion engine development | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 1 | 03-25-2008 09:06 PM |
| "The car of the future may turn out to be no car at all." | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 2 | 11-03-2007 01:22 AM |