How Many Are Going To Back Out...

[Runin11z]

Originally Posted by 'StangBlaster5000

And it all comes back to QUALITY, AMG>CTS-V
It really is that simple.
But like I said, GM will prove who is right, if the ZL1 MSRP's HIGHER than the CTS-V I will admit I was wrong

I don't disagree but the AMG is trying to catch up on performance too. It's all in the grand scale of things. GM performance, reliability, quality, at an affordable price

[Runin11z]

Originally Posted by 'StangBlaster5000

I could see 60 for the vert. But that is still less than a CTS-V

The vert should be more as this is not an option on the CTS-V.

['StangBlaster5000]

Originally Posted by Runin11z

I don't disagree but the AMG is trying to catch up on performance too. It's all in the grand scale of things. GM performance, reliability, quality, at an affordable price

AGREED! That was the point I was making. There IS a reason the Camaro is CHEEPER than a Corvette.
Its Affordable performance, when you get into the 60's thats really not what Camaro was ever about.

[chd1]

Runin11z the wits comment was to stangBlaster5000 not you.....
when you look at the price of the car or the price we know add the super charger .. car can not repeat cannot be under $50,0000

['StangBlaster5000]

Originally Posted by chd1

Runin11z the wits comment was to stangBlaster5000 not you.....
when you look at the price of the car or the price we know add the super charger .. car can not repeat cannot be under $50,0000

I never said it would be, I just said it won't be more than a CTS-V.
Like I said before, GM will decide who was right here, if they MSRP the ZL1 above the CTS-V I will admit I was wrong

[Runin11z]

Originally Posted by 'StangBlaster5000

AGREED! That was the point I was making. There IS a reason the Camaro is CHEEPER than a Corvette.
Its Affordable performance, when you get into the 60's thats really not what Camaro was ever about.

For the price of the cars the ZL1 is going to be compared to its is very affordable. Your almost there to where you can understand, put together all you have said and you have it.

['StangBlaster5000]

Originally Posted by Runin11z

For the price of the cars the ZL1 is going to be compared to its is very affordable. Your almost there to where you can understand, put together all you have said and you have it.

HAHAHA, you must be missing something?

[chd1]

no way can it be more than the cts-v

[afirehawk1]

No way!!! Been waiting too long and driving my wife crazy. We are at the point of no return.

[Runin11z]

I never said more unless it's a convertible.

[chd1]

no way will it be more that cts-v at least not the base price

['StangBlaster5000]

Originally Posted by chd1

no way can it be more than the cts-v

My point exactly. I feel like we are walking in circles here LOL.
What I am saying is that the ZL1 is faster, but NOT as high quality as the CTS-V, therefore will not price as much as one.
The 2013 GT500 runs 6 seconds faster than the ZL1 at the Nurburgring...does that mean that everyone here now thinks the GT500 should cost $100,000??????

[Runin11z]

Originally Posted by 'StangBlaster5000

My point exactly. I feel like we are walking in circles here LOL.
What I am saying is that the ZL1 is faster, but NOT as high quality as the CTS-V, therefore will not price as much as one.
The 2013 GT500 runs 6 seconds faster than the ZL1 at the Nurburgring...does that mean that everyone here now thinks the GT500 should cost $100,000??????

No but it will be more than its current price.

['StangBlaster5000]

Originally Posted by Runin11z

No but it will be more than its current price.

The Mustang 5.0 added over 100 hp and didn't go up in price, thats where your logic is flawed. Now I am seeing where you keep getting lost.
Just because a car gets better over time, does not mean the price automatically goes up.
But, you are almost there