|
View Poll Results: Body style ? | |||
Coupe | 81 | 65.32% | |
Convertable | 23 | 18.55% | |
Some kind of knight rider T-top | 20 | 16.13% | |
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
01-28-2007, 01:36 PM | #57 |
Moderator
Drives: '99 Camaro SS #1392 Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Newtown, Pa.
Posts: 3,982
|
I don't know. The more pics. I see of the 'vert, the more difficult my decision becomes.
Maybe one of each. Buy a coupe first, and a year or two later, a 'vert. |
01-28-2007, 09:41 PM | #58 |
Drives: Blk/Blk 2018 Sierra SLT Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Golden State
Posts: 2,925
|
The video of the vert rolling out to the stage is what got me thinking, damn I might just want that instead of a coupe, but I dont think I will like the way it looks with the top up....
|
03-14-2007, 01:42 AM | #59 |
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Bump for the new members...
|
03-14-2007, 07:49 AM | #60 |
Drives: Chevy Silverado Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 754
|
Do you think the air vents on the sides of the car by the rear tires will be functional or just for looks?
|
03-14-2007, 08:02 AM | #61 |
LowRider
|
I think they said are functional
|
03-14-2007, 11:26 AM | #62 |
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Yep...supposedly they are functional on the concept and will be functional on the production version as well.
|
03-14-2007, 11:29 AM | #63 |
Drives: Chevy Silverado Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 754
|
Good to hear. I don't know why, but non-functional scoops/vents/inlets bother me for some reason. Like the mustangs for example. I hate how they constantly have some kind of fake inlet design... just leave it out if it isn't functional IMO.
|
03-14-2007, 11:49 AM | #64 | |
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Quote:
I completely agree. My wife had the last body style Mustang. Fake air inlet on the hood and on sides. C'mon....make'em real. All you have to do is open the metal to make it functional! GM better make these functional. Last I heard, they would be. |
|
03-14-2007, 02:19 PM | #65 |
Drives: Chevy 1500 5.7L Vortec Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL, Go gators!
Posts: 172
|
If they arent im gettin out a saw and makin em functional, I hate fakeness in my vehichles. Makes me feal like Im drivin a ricer.
|
03-14-2007, 02:41 PM | #66 |
Drives: Chevy Silverado Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 754
|
|
03-14-2007, 05:06 PM | #67 |
GM Powertrain Retired
Drives: 67SS350, 87 IROC L98, 96SS ver Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 352
|
Either one for me, but we have already been told by a very reliable source that [/B]there will not be a T-Top version made available!!!![/B] As far as the poll, I can't decide which one, why can't we choose both if undecided?
|
03-14-2007, 06:55 PM | #68 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Vents on the sides functional? What are they supposed to do back there?
|
03-14-2007, 08:47 PM | #69 |
Drives: 1994 Impala SS Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 113
|
"Vents on the sides functional? What are they supposed to do back there?"
The ducts are intended to cool the brakes, There are vents in front for the front brakes as well. Ken |
03-15-2007, 12:45 AM | #70 |
www.Camaro5store.com
|
This is an older poll....before there was what we can call solid evidence there wasn't going to be a t-top. But, it's still nice to see how many would like to have those t-tops....I'll admit, I picked them. Hey, I have'em now and would love to have some sort of removable roof panel or something that doesn't have to do with a cloth top but would still allow for a "t-top" like experience.
|
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|