![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,709
|
Flex Fuel sensor readings drop when in boost
Never noticed this before, but my FF sensor reading drops when I do a run down the strip. I have a Triple Fore pump setup and the FF sensor on the return line after the fuel regulator (no bypass line around the FF sensor). So, my question being, what's going on? Yes, my 2nd/3rd pumps are kicking on. Shortly afterwards, my FF sensor output reading goes from 65% to 41%. IDC happy at 43%, FP hanging fine at 78psi. The issue doesn't appear to show up with low boost, it gradually worsens as my boost goes higher.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: it changes Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,128
|
How does a datalog look ? How long are any dropouts ?
I only just fitted a sensor to my own car a few days ago ( aftermarket setup ) and did notice that when fuel was not flowing the sensor would read zero. But when it was flowing it would read 5% ( pump fuel only )...but again after the pumps had stopped it didnt take long for it to read zero again. But it did make me wonder what would happen when actually driving. I do have a bypass. Probably be a few days before I drive it and maybe a few more before I add any ethanol to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,709
|
Starts at my expected 65%, drops to 52% then returns to 65% after the WOT run down the 1/4-mile. It's the white line.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,709
|
Here's the whole log run (the large picture)
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey, looking at your scanner channels, can you explain what your TORQ(mod) and WHP(mod) are? The (mod) part, that is.
As for your Flex Fuel problem, I wonder if it's a function of flow rate? Maybe the return line is seeing some cavitation, for lack of a better term, when all three pumps are running full tilt? Any way to toggle the pumps on one at a time, to see if it's a flow rate problem? -Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,709
|
TORQ(mod) is a multiplied version of the Engine Torque in HPTuners. It was pretty close with the LS3 but I had to do a multiplier with the increase in CID on the LSX. HP(mod) is calculated with the Engine Torque and has the multiplier. I set the multiplier by comparing a dyno session with the HPTuners output, and matched them.
There's a Fuel Composition Sensor (frequency) in the PIDs. I might try that to see if it's dropping. As for stepping the fuel pumps in, that would be easy enough to try. The FF sensor in on the return line (original stock supply line), so it's after the filter, rails, regulator.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS 6sp Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Drivers Seat
Posts: 1,905
|
I worked with Dave Steck quite a bit while developing his triple fuel pump assembly. I also troubleshot his dsx aux pump with him, and own his FF kit. He told me explicitly to NEVER put the FF sensor in the return line. Guys are always reporting odd stuff to DSX when they do so.
That being said, mine is in the return. Lol.
__________________
2011 Camaro SS---SOLD
TMS Dart 427 FED M311s, ESS Tuning G4 Blower, DSX Triple FP Assembly, DSX FF, FIC1300, Mcleod RXT 1200HD, Edlebrock Pro Flo XT 1158whp 1017wtq. 2010 CTS-V A6 - "Stock" SOLD 630whp 658wtq 2024 F-150 RCSB 5.0 4x4 waiting for tunes... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS LS3 Whipple Join Date: May 2019
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,925
|
I wonder if you're using enough fuel while at wot that you aren't getting much flow of fuel in the return line and its skewing the reading.
__________________
Whipple 2.9 CAI ID1050x injectors ZL1 Pump JRE FPCM JMS Voltage booster JRE Rough Idle blower cam BTR .660 springs CHE trunnion kit 1 7/8 Speed Engineering Borla Atak JRE scoop 1.5" lowering springs BMR trailing arms and toe links Cradle inserts 704WHP 603WTQ 93 octane
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,709
|
Quote:
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS LS3 Whipple Join Date: May 2019
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,925
|
But it's in the return line, why would the fuel move faster through the return line while you're using more fuel under WOT. I'm thinking as your engine consumes more fuel the flow in the return is actually diminished which would cause the inaccuracy. Probably not the easiest thing to do but if possible I'd try it before the rail and see if the problem goes away.
__________________
Whipple 2.9 CAI ID1050x injectors ZL1 Pump JRE FPCM JMS Voltage booster JRE Rough Idle blower cam BTR .660 springs CHE trunnion kit 1 7/8 Speed Engineering Borla Atak JRE scoop 1.5" lowering springs BMR trailing arms and toe links Cradle inserts 704WHP 603WTQ 93 octane
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: it changes Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,128
|
I would highly doubt speed has anything to do with it.
Although the behaviour sounds odd Raw frequency signal of the sensor would be interesting though, as they should range from 50-150Hz so if that was still stable...the issue is with how that signal is being interpreted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,709
|
I start digging and looking and find other weird stuff. This time my E% dropped from my expected 65% to 58%, then 55%, then 50%, returning to the expected 65% after letting off crossing the end of the quarter.
Now, the weird stuff - my FP is dropping when launching. I'm doing my 2-step thing (mine only cuts ignition), building a little boost, easing out the clutch and see my FP tank to 30 (see 1st pic). It recovers. This happened 2 of out 11 runs. The other time was when I activated my anti-lag (timing retard) and while it built up boost, the FP dropped out (see 2nd pic). So, this looks boost/fuel pump related? That 2nd picture, however, did not have the E% drop the whole run.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Drives: 2014 ZL1 Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: KCMO
Posts: 180
|
I need these graph set ups!
Flow in the return line under high rpm is going to be my guess. Why is the sensor on the return line? Did I miss something? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,709
|
I had it in the supply on my LS3 setup with LPE twin-fuel pump supplying. No issues. When the Triple Fore was installed we used the original supply fuel line as the new return line, keeping the FF sensor in place. Can't really think why that would be a problem.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|