Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-15-2025, 11:52 AM   #15
sr530
 
Drives: Chevy Astro
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: PNW
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by acammer View Post
They are all present at about 4200. It's not just a rev control, but it modulate the throttle blade with the clutch release, and what it sees for available traction. All of that is designed to work around a known tire compound, gear ratio, and power train - and all of that on pavement. As soon as you start to change anything about the car, and/or take it to a sticky drag strip, the viability of that factory launch control is out the window. A good driver even with everything being stock will stand to get more out of the car with it defeated. It guess it's fun to mess with when the car is stock, but once you start in on the mods, it just doesn't have the capability to produce really good results.

A second gear start would really slow the car down. Generally speaking, unless they've got a PD blower installed that makes tremendous amounts of low end torque, these cars actually need quote a bit MORE starting line ratio. For context - my car hooks well (on good, drag-specific tires) with a 4.63 rear gear and the standard SS "M10" ratio set with a 3.01 first gear. So that's like a 13.9:1 starting line ratio. The 1-2 shift definitely comes up quick!
I'm wondering how much potential you are leaving on the table with the RXT and no clutch hit controller

Grant
sr530 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2025, 01:25 PM   #16
acammer
GPI Sales Consultant
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS SGM
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 3,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by sr530 View Post
I'm wondering how much potential you are leaving on the table with the RXT and no clutch hit controller

Grant
Tons!!!!

The Hoosier QTP is the hit controller in the current configuration. The car has never 60' faster or more consistent than it is with that tire. No doubt because the bias ply offers it that bit of slip that's soo much harder to get from the clutch. The Hoosiers were on the wheels when I bought 'em, so I gave 'em a try, and they really impressed me with how easy it was to consistently run within a few numbers in the 60' while making the best times yet. Too easy after spending years slipping the clutch on radials.

It hasn't been to the track with the Max Package 2.0 setup and 4.63 gear on a radial. It is something that's probably going to happen in the future, as I'm planning to put the drag pack on a radial soon as the Hoosiers are spent. It'll be a 305/45R17, probably an ET-R or ET S/S. I agree, the RXT is a fast, aggressive engagement, it's gonna be tricky to keep the tire hooked and not bog it. The 13.9:1 starting line ratio will help, but I agree that some clutch release help would be a key to make it fast and consistent.

The clutch is obviously all wrong for what I do right now. I was trying to live in the buy once, cry once world, and have something that'll take 750+whp reliably once it has boost on board. Everything happens slower than we'd like, so here it is 6 years into that clutch, and it still is NA and way more than the current powerplant needs. :(
__________________
GPI Max Package 2.0: Brodix BR7 heads/GPI porting, MAX3 cam, ST2116LSR, BSR Max Lift rockers, LS7 LSXR with 103mm TB, Vararam OTR, Mcleod RXT, G-Force/Strange 9" IRS setup with 4.63 gear. 551whp, 11.1@124mph.
Got a question about a GPI product? Feel free to shoot me a message!
acammer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.