![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Fast Cars and Old Guitars
Drives: 2015 2SS RS (L99, baby!) Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: N. CA
Posts: 4,263
|
Quote:
__________________
“I don’t want to belong to any club that would have me as a member.” - Groucho Marx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,412
|
It being built at the Lansing Grand River Assembly plant, 99% sure it will be a sedan. Remember for over 6 months now we knew that a unnamed V8 sedan was currently planed to be built there. With the announcement of what all is going to be built there, this pretty much secures that the Camaro will be that unnamed sedan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Fast Cars and Old Guitars
Drives: 2015 2SS RS (L99, baby!) Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: N. CA
Posts: 4,263
|
Quote:
>DETROIT (WKRC) - Chevrolet will reportedly revive the Camaro to take on the new Dodge Charger and Ford Mustang.<
__________________
“I don’t want to belong to any club that would have me as a member.” - Groucho Marx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Good Times Rollin'
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS/1LE Join Date: Aug 2025
Location: "Luhvuhl KY" ...LOL!
Posts: 224
|
Got this from an AI search, thought interesting to share while we still don't know much. Admittedly speculative, but maybe some clues...?
1) Platform: “Alpha 2” = evolutionary, not radical • Multiple reports agree the new Camaro will use an updated version of GM’s Alpha architecture (“Alpha 2”). • This is significant because the original GM Alpha platform already underpinned: o 2016–2024 Camaro o Cadillac ATS / CT4 / CT5 Implication (high confidence): • Front-engine, rear-wheel drive layout remains • Likely similar proportions (long hood, performance-focused chassis) • Continued focus on handling balance (Alpha is known for near 50/50 weight distribution) 👉 This strongly supports your excerpt’s takeaway: not a crossover-first EV architecture. ________________________________________ 2) Internal combustion is very likely staying • Reports explicitly state the new car will retain ICE powertrains rather than going fully electric. • Cadillac’s next CT5 (same platform family) is already confirmed to remain gas-powered, reinforcing this direction. Possible engines (still unconfirmed but plausible): • Turbo 4 / V6 carryover concepts • V8 remains very likely for performance trims • There is industry chatter about a next-gen small-block V8 (even ~6.7L) potentially being shared with Corvette programs 👉 Bottom line: This is shaping up as a traditional ICE performance car, not an EV replacement. ________________________________________ 3) Production location & timing • Nearly all sources align: o Built at Lansing Grand River Assembly o Production start: late 2027 o Marketed as a 2028 model year Why Lansing matters: • Already builds Cadillac CT4/CT5 (Alpha-based cars) • Camaro was previously built there → minimal retooling needed • CT4 is being discontinued, freeing capacity ________________________________________ 4) Shared program with Cadillac + possible Buick sedan • New Camaro is reportedly part of a 3-car program: o Next-gen Cadillac CT5 o New Buick sedan o Camaro • All sharing the same Alpha 2 base 👉 This suggests: • GM is doubling down on RWD sedans/coupes, not abandoning them • Economies of scale are what make Camaro’s return viable ________________________________________ What is still uncertain / conflicting... 1) Body style (this is the biggest unknown) • Some signals suggest a traditional coupe return • BUT GM Authority issued a warning: it “might not be exactly what you would expect” Possible interpretations: • 2-door coupe (classic Camaro) ✔️ • 4-door “muscle sedan” ❓ • Liftback / sportback ❓ • Something Mustang Mach-E–like (less likely now given ICE platform) ________________________________________ 2) Performance ceiling / ZL1 equivalent • No confirmed specs • But given: o Continued V8 investment by GM o Shared architecture with Cadillac performance sedans 👉 Expectation (not confirmed): • SS equivalent → V8 • High-performance variant (ZL1 successor) → very likely ________________________________________ 3) Electrification level • Fully electric: unlikely • Hybrid: possible but not confirmed GM has been inconsistent here, so this remains open. ________________________________________ 4) Volume and positioning • Combined production (Camaro + CT5 + Buick sedan): o ~60,000–75,000 units annually 👉 That implies: • Camaro will likely be lower-volume, more premium/performance-focused • Possibly positioned closer to Mustang GT / Dark Horse territory
__________________
Just gettin' started...
![]() Monster S Twin clutch, CAI intake + Phastek scoop, Elite Engineering catch can, BMR toe rods/trailing arms, Katech TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() Drives: '10 T/A Conv, '10 2SS, '77 SE T/A Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 935
|
I's fun to dream, but don't get your hopes up. There is as much chance of a new Camaro as there is bringing back Pontiac (Trans Am).
If they will do it, then it must be profitable, and the lack of that and dismal sales is what killed it off in 2002 and 2024, as well as the host of other vehicle lines like Saturn, Olds, Hummer, etc. Being a long time GM employee, there is no substantive info that has leaked out, but no surprise - like the Corvette Launch's that info is locked down tightly. Being the owner of (3) 5th Gen's, I hope they do bring it back! And then we can do a 7th Gen Trans Am Conversion! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Fast Cars and Old Guitars
Drives: 2015 2SS RS (L99, baby!) Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: N. CA
Posts: 4,263
|
If I were the marketing team manager - or especially the CFO, nothing would seem to KILL profit more than this ridiculous scenario:
4-door “muscle sedan” ❓ Liftback / sportback
__________________
“I don’t want to belong to any club that would have me as a member.” - Groucho Marx
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
waiting at the tree
Drives: SIM 2010 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 4,540
|
Quote:
The Caddy C5 and an unnamed Buick model will be built along side with a total production of 65-75k units. You can thank Obama for Pontiac getting the axe...Bob Lutz said so.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS A6 Just a few bolt-ons and appearance doo dads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
waiting at the tree
Drives: SIM 2010 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 4,540
|
Quote:
The Camaro will be 2 doors. These cars will be primarily powered by ICE. Could be a Hybird in there some where but that hasn't been announced.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS A6 Just a few bolt-ons and appearance doo dads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Good Times Rollin'
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS/1LE Join Date: Aug 2025
Location: "Luhvuhl KY" ...LOL!
Posts: 224
|
Could not agree more.
__________________
Just gettin' started...
![]() Monster S Twin clutch, CAI intake + Phastek scoop, Elite Engineering catch can, BMR toe rods/trailing arms, Katech TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: May 2019
Location: Hki.Finland
Posts: 1,349
|
Let's remember this picture, taken on 5/24.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
waiting at the tree
Drives: SIM 2010 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 4,540
|
I think that was a rejected update of the Gen 6
![]() The brass probably said if thats the best we can do on a refresh then lets just mothball the name until we come up with something better ![]() Besides that looks like bad photo chop.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS A6 Just a few bolt-ons and appearance doo dads
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,412
|
Yea, that pic is fake as hell. If you look, it extends inside of the red one on the left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: May 2019
Location: Hki.Finland
Posts: 1,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: 2010 SS M6 ABM Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Nashville, IN
Posts: 399
|
I wouldn't be too surprised if they built the Camaro as a 2-door and built a sedan off the same platform under a different name. Chevelle would be a fun one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|