0-60MPH times - Page 6 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

Bowtie Guy Z28 · 10-20-2009, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GQ4Life

just got mine.. going to compare its time to my Aeroforce Scan Gauge

Let us know the results.

GQ4Life · 10-20-2009, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowtie Guy Z28

Let us know the results.

damn roads too bumpy in the bronx.. I got to find a nice spot
I tried on hutch south entrance.. I was getting rev right (2step) guy behind me honking cuz car was rollin down the hill toward him (i was on a up hill).. then road was so bumpy i had to get out of it..
i try to find a place tomorrow.. maybe my dad knows a spot

scrming · 11-12-2009, 07:07 AM

Had the day off work yesterday...

Did this:

Got this:

Previous best was a 5.58... I would like to think the two are related... LOL

Scott@Bjorn3D · 11-12-2009, 07:33 AM

I am hitting 0-60 in about 4.8 right now. Hard to get traction with my rear tires at the moment.

97one · 11-12-2009, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scrming

Had the day off work yesterday.

Previous best was a 5.58... I would like to think the two are related... LOL

John,
Was the Temp.,Humidity, & the Bar. Pres. all the Same ?

I ran & Recorded 37: 0-60mph runs so far. All the same place & elevation.
I find Temp. & Bar. Pres. make a VAST difference in times. Humidity also makes a difference. I know you know that, But............
Just the diff. in Bar.Pres. of 30.09" to 30.31" ALONE, can make a .15 sec. difference in runs.

scrming · 11-12-2009, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97one

John,
Was the Temp.,Humidity, & the Bar. Pres. all the Same ?

I ran & Recorded 37: 0-60mph runs so far. All the same place & elevation.
I find Temp. & Bar. Pres. make a VAST difference in times. Humidity also makes a difference. I know you know that, But............
Just the diff. in Bar.Pres. of 30.09" to 30.31" ALONE, can make a .15 sec. difference in runs.

I'm in DENIAL that weather had anything to do with this!!!

I always do this test on the same stretch of road... Weather condition were very similar but not 100% sure... I actually think yesterday was WARMER than my previous best. Perhaps tonight I can dig through my stuff and get a better feel for the weather conditions...

scrming · 11-12-2009, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 97one

John,
Was the Temp.,Humidity, & the Bar. Pres. all the Same ?

I ran & Recorded 37: 0-60mph runs so far. All the same place & elevation.
I find Temp. & Bar. Pres. make a VAST difference in times. Humidity also makes a difference. I know you know that, But............
Just the diff. in Bar.Pres. of 30.09" to 30.31" ALONE, can make a .15 sec. difference in runs.

Ok... dig through the weather records.. and my runs very close to the weather station...

My 5.58 run had a DA of about -890... Yesterday did have a slightly higher bar.pres. but it was offset by the warmer temps yesterday... Yesterdays DA was about -290.

Details:

5.58 - temp 40 bar 30.35 hum 45%
5.44 - temp 50 bar 30.45 hum 56%

Now.. if only I could get to the track when the DA was like that!!! LOL

NJSS · 11-16-2009, 10:44 PM

I have a Performance Box that records 0-60, 0-100, 0-100-0, 1/4 mile and etc. I basically use it as a lap timer on a track prepped car. It also syncs with a video recorder, gives g-forces, braking and acceleration points, so it is kind of cool to see yourself moving with the video. You can also bring up Google Earth and look at the path you took to accomplish those times. A bit pricey at $499, but lots of fun.

JohnInSoCal · 11-17-2009, 03:44 AM

i'm not sure how accurate the matrix is. I did a 0-60 MPH run with the matrix and with iPhone dynolicous at the same time and they were off by quite a bit. The matrix had the 0-60 at 4.24 seconds and iPhone/dynolicous was at 4.82 more than half a second difference. I only did one run but will do some more and see if they are always off that much.

JohnInSoCal · 11-27-2009, 03:59 PM

well I did another 0-60 MPH run with both matrix and iPhone at the same time and got 3.89 seconds with iPhone/dynolicious and 3.94 with matix so that is pretty close, only .05 seconds difference. Not sure why it was so far off before. This is for a L99 not stock.

Scott@Bjorn3D · 11-27-2009, 07:00 PM

Pulling 4.1 with the new tires and cool air.

JohnInSoCal · 11-27-2009, 09:28 PM

wow 4.1 is great stock. I'd like to see how fast I can get my 0-60 time if I can get it to hook up right, just need to practice.

acatlover13 · 11-27-2009, 09:59 PM

I have no idea....how do I accurately time that?

JohnInSoCal · 11-27-2009, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acatlover13

I have no idea....how do I accurately time that?

if you have an iPhone you can get dynolicious or several other apps that use the internal accelerometer in the phone and have been reviewed to be very accurate. Or you can buy something like this KAT Matrix, it's only $28

http://www.amazon.com/T-Matrix-3-Axi.../dp/B000KZRE5E

I have both, they agreed one time and didn't another. I need more runs to get a better idea but they are probably both pretty accurate. Also with the iPhone it's critical to get a mount for it, if not you will not get accurate results. The Matrix comes with a mount and I just stick it on the radio when I want to make a run, can't beat it for $28

11-12-2009, 07:07 AM	#73
scrming Red Brick of Vengeance! Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: at my pulpit Posts: 7,745	Had the day off work yesterday... Did this: Got this: Previous best was a 5.58... I would like to think the two are related... LOL __________________ 2011 Ford Flex EcoBoost Limited - 12.727 @ 109.790 MPH

11-27-2009, 09:59 PM	#83
acatlover13 Emerald Coast Camaros Drives: 2010 2SS/RS Camaro IOM/IO Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Lynn Haven, Florida Posts: 3,054 View My Garage	I have no idea....how do I accurately time that? __________________ ECC on Facebook 2010 Camaro SS/RS IOM, IO interior, Custom Striping, Razzi body kit ADM CAI w/scoop/Dynatech Headers & Hi-Flow Cats/Solo Performance Exhaust, FTI 3600 Stall/Comp Cams custom grind cam/LS3 conversion/FAST 102 Intake

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
4th Gen 1/4 mile times versus 5th Gen 1/4 mile times	Rock36	Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion	52	07-29-2009 11:01 PM
Non-Trackpack '10 Mustang times?	Mr. Wyndham	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	9	07-24-2009 11:39 AM
New York Times: New Camaro Turns Heads in Manhattan	camaro5	Camaro Photos \| Spyshots \| Video \| Media Gallery	12	03-27-2009 07:32 PM
The BEST of times in the worst of times	ctk1	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	7	03-06-2009 12:36 PM
Edmund's times, how accurate are they?	camaro_burns_all	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	5	01-28-2009 06:24 PM

11-12-2009, 07:33 AM	#74
Scott@Bjorn3D Drives: Kami, 2013 2SS LS3 Luvin Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Eufaula, Alabama Posts: 6,427	I am hitting 0-60 in about 4.8 right now. Hard to get traction with my rear tires at the moment.

11-16-2009, 10:44 PM	#78
NJSS Drives: 2010 2SS RS - Inferno Orange 6 spd Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: New Jersey Posts: 39	I have a Performance Box that records 0-60, 0-100, 0-100-0, 1/4 mile and etc. I basically use it as a lap timer on a track prepped car. It also syncs with a video recorder, gives g-forces, braking and acceleration points, so it is kind of cool to see yourself moving with the video. You can also bring up Google Earth and look at the path you took to accomplish those times. A bit pricey at $499, but lots of fun.

11-17-2009, 03:44 AM	#79
JohnInSoCal Drives: RJT L99 500HP Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: SoCal Posts: 535	i'm not sure how accurate the matrix is. I did a 0-60 MPH run with the matrix and with iPhone dynolicous at the same time and they were off by quite a bit. The matrix had the 0-60 at 4.24 seconds and iPhone/dynolicous was at 4.82 more than half a second difference. I only did one run but will do some more and see if they are always off that much.

11-27-2009, 03:59 PM	#80
JohnInSoCal Drives: RJT L99 500HP Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: SoCal Posts: 535	well I did another 0-60 MPH run with both matrix and iPhone at the same time and got 3.89 seconds with iPhone/dynolicious and 3.94 with matix so that is pretty close, only .05 seconds difference. Not sure why it was so far off before. This is for a L99 not stock.

11-27-2009, 07:00 PM	#81
Scott@Bjorn3D Drives: Kami, 2013 2SS LS3 Luvin Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Eufaula, Alabama Posts: 6,427	Pulling 4.1 with the new tires and cool air.

11-27-2009, 09:28 PM	#82
JohnInSoCal Drives: RJT L99 500HP Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: SoCal Posts: 535	wow 4.1 is great stock. I'd like to see how fast I can get my 0-60 time if I can get it to hook up right, just need to practice.