Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2009, 03:37 PM   #71
mjf6866
 
mjf6866's Avatar
 
Drives: 09 Challenger R/T 6-speed 3.92 rear
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: sitting on an angry chair with angry walls that steal the air
Posts: 423
wow, its like tip-toeing around land minds here. thread was goin smooth, goin smooth, amicable chatter, then BAM!...some guys get labeled "fanboys" for dare saying that a challenger can beat another car in the real world.

didnt realize that challenger site has spawned such passionate hatred! especially against any of us dodge boys that dare say anything nice about our own cars. i would consider myself a dodge boy, but i like what the competition has too. guys relax a little
__________________
a few mods:
-180* Jet t-stat
-Amsoil Eaa drop in filter
-HopNot total package
-275/50-17 M&H drag radials on mustang cobra r's for track days
future mods:
-hurst shifter
-exhaust
-custom tune
-driver mod
mjf6866 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 03:42 PM   #72
AZ MSCL
 
AZ MSCL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 719
Yup

Quote:
Originally Posted by chappy48 View Post
I'm guessing she likes the blocky, blingy, futuristic looking vehicles (Flex, Cube, Scion xB, Honda Element etc...). To each there own. What about roadsters? Like a Miata, Saturn Skyy, Honda S2000 or Solstice? Those are "cool". But she wouldn't be able to drive many friends around. But, wind in your hair, with the top down on a twisty road...can't beat that.
You are correct. Blocky, blingy and futuristic. Maybe it's the TV commercials. She can buy a convertible when she can afford one. At least she's not in love with Ferrari's.
__________________
AZ MSCL: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT Premium.

AZ MSCL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 03:51 PM   #73
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-Or-Nothing View Post
I didn't mean you made it up. It is just hard for me to believe that a car could ride around that long without a spindle nut.
What's even harder to believe is that cars without a spindle nut made it out of the factory. That's flat-out scary.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 04:00 PM   #74
AZ MSCL
 
AZ MSCL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 719
We don't need no stinking spindle nut - I've been driving mine since April without one and it works just fine. Do they cost extra? Maybe that'll be my next mod!
__________________
AZ MSCL: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT Premium.

AZ MSCL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 04:02 PM   #75
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
And I am not talking rag times, take the 2 cars to track and it is going to be a drivers race, plain and simple. I see what your problem is now, you think I am all mopar and you are sour because ou got banned from a Challenger website, ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf6866 View Post
wow, its like tip-toeing around land minds here. thread was goin smooth, goin smooth, amicable chatter, then BAM!...some guys get labeled "fanboys" for dare saying that a challenger can beat another car in the real world.
I have seen Challengers at the track, an SRT and an RT running slicks. Neither could break 14.0! And no, I'm not saying they are that slow. The mags are genrally pretty accurate with the 1/4 mile tests, the only people who complain are fanboys who can't accept their car wasn't the fastest. Show me one independant test that says with equal drivers the SRT is faster. Just one.

As for it being a driver's race, most races are. But it drives me nuts that Challenger guys can't just accept that with equal drivers, their car is slower than a Camaro SS.

As for getting banned, I think it's funny. Considering the fact that I got banned for challenging them to meet me and some Stang guys at the track so we could shoot video and post the results no matter who won, I think it shows who is just running their mouths and refusing to back it up.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 04:05 PM   #76
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by rham48 View Post
We don't need no stinking spindle nut - I've been driving mine since April without one and it works just fine. Do they cost extra? Maybe that'll be my next mod!
All joking aside, I'd at least take it in to the dealer if you got a recall notice.

My car has so far been recall free, but if I got a recall letter I'd sure as heck bring it in.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 04:07 PM   #77
AZ MSCL
 
AZ MSCL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 719
What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad65 View Post
I have seen Challengers at the track, an SRT and an RT running slicks. Neither could break 14.0! And no, I'm not saying they are that slow. The mags are genrally pretty accurate with the 1/4 mile tests, the only people who complain are fanboys who can't accept their car wasn't the fastest. Show me one independant test that says with equal drivers the SRT is faster. Just one.

As for it being a driver's race, most races are. But it drives me nuts that Challenger guys can't just accept that with equal drivers, their car is slower than a Camaro SS.

As for getting banned, I think it's funny. Considering the fact that I got banned for challenging them to meet me and some Stang guys at the track so we could shoot video and post the results no matter who won, I think it shows who is just running their mouths and refusing to back it up.

Didn't you see my independent test above?
__________________
AZ MSCL: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT Premium.

AZ MSCL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 04:12 PM   #78
AZ MSCL
 
AZ MSCL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 719
1bad65, I think we've been abandoned... Hey look at that, 140 posts!
__________________
AZ MSCL: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT Premium.

AZ MSCL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 04:20 PM   #79
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
I have 212.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 04:38 PM   #80
AZ MSCL
 
AZ MSCL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 719
What do you think my daughter should drive for a first car? No muscle cars or convertibles.
__________________
AZ MSCL: 2009 Challenger RT, 2010 Mustang GT Premium.

AZ MSCL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 05:04 PM   #81
KoTToN
 
KoTToN's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 SilveradoSS AWD
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orange County -CA
Posts: 426
Quote:
Originally Posted by rham48 View Post
What do you think my daughter should drive for a first car? No muscle cars or convertibles.
__________________
Sales Forcasting 101A:
Quote:
Originally Posted by returnofcc View Post
Like I said before, there is a dealership that is 4 miles away from my house that has 3 2SS's just sitting on their lot. And this is a very small dealership it's not a high volume dealership in a populated area., Come early summer, when 2011's are coming out, the camaro will be offered for 0%. I guarantee it
Sales Forcasting 101B:
Quote:
Originally Posted by returnofcc View Post
apparently you didn't understand my post correctly. If there are 4 (now 6) camaros sitting at a low volume dealership, just imagine how many are sitting at the high volume dealerships
KoTToN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 05:32 PM   #82
mjf6866
 
mjf6866's Avatar
 
Drives: 09 Challenger R/T 6-speed 3.92 rear
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: sitting on an angry chair with angry walls that steal the air
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad65 View Post
I have seen Challengers at the track, an SRT and an RT running slicks. Neither could break 14.0! And no, I'm not saying they are that slow. The mags are genrally pretty accurate with the 1/4 mile tests, the only people who complain are fanboys who can't accept their car wasn't the fastest. Show me one independant test that says with equal drivers the SRT is faster. Just one.

As for it being a driver's race, most races are. But it drives me nuts that Challenger guys can't just accept that with equal drivers, their car is slower than a Camaro SS.

As for getting banned, I think it's funny. Considering the fact that I got banned for challenging them to meet me and some Stang guys at the track so we could shoot video and post the results no matter who won, I think it shows who is just running their mouths and refusing to back it up.
i'm not disputing the fact that the SS is faster than the SRT out of the box. i've never posted that in this thread or any other ones. there is no doubt there from me. what i'm saying is the margin is close enough that with different drivers out there anyone can win. that goes for the mustang too. i dont know why some people cant grasp that. in the real world, driver skill will determine the outcome of races before the car will(unless you put a stock civic against a gt500 ). that is especially true when the cars are posting numbers withing a few tenths(mustang/camaro/challenger).

i wont take a magazine article to heart until they can develope cyborgs to drive the cars that are created exactly the same with the same driving skill sets THEN put the cars head to head....ok, i'm gettin over my head there, but i'm sure ya get the point
__________________
a few mods:
-180* Jet t-stat
-Amsoil Eaa drop in filter
-HopNot total package
-275/50-17 M&H drag radials on mustang cobra r's for track days
future mods:
-hurst shifter
-exhaust
-custom tune
-driver mod
mjf6866 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 05:43 PM   #83
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
I agree with that last post mjf.

But people have to accept that certain cars are faster than others. Yes, if they are close it's a driver's race. That's the fun in racing. But if you take two cars that are stock and one is faster, the faster car will ALWAYS win IF it's driver drives it to it's full potential, no matter how good the driver in the slower car is.

I've beaten cars faster than mine, and lost to cars slower than mine. But I freely admit that 5th Gen Camaros and Challenger SRTs are faster than S197s, stock vs stock.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 05:46 PM   #84
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
Rham, I agree with Kotton. lol

Seriously, getting a new driver an SUV is not a bad idea. They are roomy, and most importantly, the safest cars to be in if (God forbid) she has an accident.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CAMARO WIKI Tran Wiki 67 11-27-2024 09:02 AM
Vortech Supercharger Systems for 2010 Camaro Official Release Brian@Vortech Forced Induction - V8 98 02-20-2010 12:04 AM
Camaro5 invites you to say thanks to Camaro assemblers and tour the Martinrea plant! Hylton 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 646 12-23-2009 04:41 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 08:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.