![]() |
|
|
#85 |
![]() Drives: 69,10 camaro 71 chevelle Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Shelbyville, IL
Posts: 722
|
It depends on who you talk to!!! Ill claim the stock record though if thats alright.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS RS M6 Bone stock 12.58 at 110mph http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=263
1971 Chevelle SS 454 365hp NHRA C/SA 10.73 at 122 1969 Camaro (427 ZL-1 clone) M-22 being built 1982 Siverado 4x4 454 Mud truck stock class 3.66 sec in 150' of mud |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
Lets give the K&N air filter the credit it deserves. Instead of his run being 12.62 @ 110 mph, lets change it to 12.63 @ 110 mph. The Camaro SS is NA. Its not Forced Induction. I've owned several turbo cars and I understand boost increase with modifications (without tuning). But the Camaro doesn't fall into the same category and will not make any significant HP (maybe 1-2 hp if that) from a K&N drop in filter using the stock intake box. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
![]() Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 368
|
Just saying how they do make a differance. Boosted or na don't matter. Aftermarket equals modified.. End this stupid discusion.
__________________
2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
|
Quote:
Why is that? Just curious as I have several friends telling me to skip the NA part of my little project and go boost. I'm guessing something to do with a really big bump stick, which I won't have to worry about in my project. At least I don't plan on it, lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Mustang GT Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 1,358
|
Quote:
Yall better have every single oz of weight in your car, with a full tank of gas, with proper/ recommended air pressure in your tires, before changing your oil, tires, air filters, transmission fluid, brake fluid, radiator coolant. The argument is stupid......Your are right............ it is stupid to think that the Air Filter and Royal purple oil change gave him .2 in the quarter mile (next closest time) ________ Babi Mac Break Away Last edited by jrc1122; 03-11-2011 at 11:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
![]() Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 368
|
10hp is about .1 in the quarter. Also you have to look at 60 foot times. Which I couldn't find but that is also .1 better 60 is about .2 up top.
__________________
2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
K&N drop in's don't make anywhere close to 10hp on a 2010 Camaro. It's been proven by several members (dyno testing). Most have found no HP improvement with a K&N drop in over the stock airbox.
Quote:Ted (Jannetty Racing) did a run with a K&N filter along with all the other CAI he did the other day... the K&N didn't flow any more than the stock filter. . . didn't make any more HP either... |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
A modification is a modification, with the oil, it wasn't a matter of changing oil, but to a synthetic PROVEN to increase performance, not only with extra HP but putting the power down at a lower gear, sorry NHRA Stocker, but it was not a bone stock run........ When it comes down to it, there is no way to tell if and how much effect those things had and hence it cannot be called bone stock, modified is modified no matter that the extent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Are you implying that K&N make as much of a difference as increasing/decreasing boost? We are talking about a paper filter, not boosting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
![]() Drives: 69,10 camaro 71 chevelle Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Shelbyville, IL
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
__________________
2010 Camaro SS RS M6 Bone stock 12.58 at 110mph http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=263
1971 Chevelle SS 454 365hp NHRA C/SA 10.73 at 122 1969 Camaro (427 ZL-1 clone) M-22 being built 1982 Siverado 4x4 454 Mud truck stock class 3.66 sec in 150' of mud |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
![]() Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 368
|
What was your 60 foot?
__________________
2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2010 2SS/RS IOM with IO Accent Seats - Available NOW | AnnaBear@SpartaChevy | Dealer Camaros for Sale | 7 | 12-14-2009 05:40 PM |
| 2010 2SS/RS + Z28 hood? | JEFE SS | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 20 | 07-23-2009 06:43 PM |