Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2010, 04:39 PM   #57
Russell James


 
Russell James's Avatar
 
Drives: '15 SS 1LE, '69 Z28 drag car
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mich
Posts: 4,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by litle88 View Post
Explain to me why you guys prefer not to tune a 1 7/8 or EVEN a 2 in primary long tube headers? As long as the AFR is the same throughout the test with all the headers then its fair. Not tuning a 2in primary and getting AFR reading at the tailpipe will not be accurate enough for a REAL test.
I think it's just to keep things consistent and leave out any other variables for someone to debate affected the outcome.

I think it will be nice to know - On the stock tune, these 3 different header pipe sizes did - this, this and this - draw your own conclusions.

Looking forward to the results
Russell James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 06:31 PM   #58
mbacamaross
 
mbacamaross's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 6.2 sierra 2022 zl1 camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 199
:popc orn:: popcorn::popco rn::p opcorn::popcor n::po pcorn::popcorn ::pop corn: :popc orn:
__________________
______________________________________
censored
mbacamaross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 08:08 PM   #59
lee

 
lee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2ss/rs
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,016
i might have missed it but has there been a date set or is ted still waiting to see which header companys jump on board ?
lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 08:28 PM   #60
DCv2
 
Drives: ...working on it
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 31
DCv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 09:09 PM   #61
Total_Perf_Eng
 
Total_Perf_Eng's Avatar
 
Drives: Corvette
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 509
Send a message via AIM to Total_Perf_Eng
Unfortunately, the great header debate will always be a debate.. By keeping the stock catback, there will be a huge group of guys that say whats the point in uncorking the headers only to re-cork at the catback. Then, there will be guys who say without proper tuning, the results are severly skewed. No matteer what, there will always be a majority group that disagrees with some part of the test.

Me personally.... At least it will give a decent trend to work from. If one specific header is more powerfull, chances are, when tuned or uncorked, the percentege of difference will be somewhere around the same.

Th 2" will be at a huge disadvantage though. I personally run those on my blown 443. I would never do that on a stock displacement.

My vote is 1 3/4 will make more average torque, 1 7/8 will make more peak power, and the 2" will show little, if anything over the 1 7/8"

But the winner will be 1 3/4..

Subscribed...
Total_Perf_Eng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 11:11 PM   #62
COBRA CAMANDER
 
COBRA CAMANDER's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portsmouth VA
Posts: 172
Ted, can you test with a tune to see which one can be tuned to get the most HP also? Sorry if this has been asked before, but what size cats and cat back is being used on the test?
COBRA CAMANDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 09:57 AM   #63
PieNsky

 
PieNsky's Avatar
 
Drives: Victory Red 1LS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 1,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Total_Perf_Eng View Post
Unfortunately, the great header debate will always be a debate.. By keeping the stock catback, there will be a huge group of guys that say whats the point in uncorking the headers only to re-cork at the catback. Then, there will be guys who say without proper tuning, the results are severly skewed. No matteer what, there will always be a majority group that disagrees with some part of the test.

Me personally.... At least it will give a decent trend to work from. If one specific header is more powerfull, chances are, when tuned or uncorked, the percentege of difference will be somewhere around the same.

Th 2" will be at a huge disadvantage though. I personally run those on my blown 443. I would never do that on a stock displacement.

My vote is 1 3/4 will make more average torque, 1 7/8 will make more peak power, and the 2" will show little, if anything over the 1 7/8"

But the winner will be 1 3/4..

Subscribed...
Well you could always counter and tell them that the guys who dynoed their cars with the cutouts showed little to no added HP?
PieNsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 10:14 AM   #64
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Total_Perf_Eng View Post
Unfortunately, the great header debate will always be a debate.. By keeping the stock catback, there will be a huge group of guys that say whats the point in uncorking the headers only to re-cork at the catback. Then, there will be guys who say without proper tuning, the results are severly skewed. No matteer what, there will always be a majority group that disagrees with some part of the test.

Me personally.... At least it will give a decent trend to work from. If one specific header is more powerfull, chances are, when tuned or uncorked, the percentege of difference will be somewhere around the same.

Th 2" will be at a huge disadvantage though. I personally run those on my blown 443. I would never do that on a stock displacement.

My vote is 1 3/4 will make more average torque, 1 7/8 will make more peak power, and the 2" will show little, if anything over the 1 7/8"

But the winner will be 1 3/4..

Subscribed...
I totally Agree, I am seeing a Trend of guys who may never go past CAI, Headers, cat back and a tune and want to know what best fits they're need.

What I hope to show is more about the Graph (Area under the Curve) rather than the peak power number

If a person can see how the power curves are shaped then they can decide what best fits they're needs rather than what header makes the most power at 6200.

There is a ton of speculation, and experience in everyones opinion but there are still too many unasnwered questions that I Hope to Answer.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 11:07 AM   #65
Sack Rat 2SS

 
Sack Rat 2SS's Avatar
 
Drives: Silver SS/RS, Man 6
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 884
I am anxiously watching this. Subscribed. Thanks Ted for what you do.
__________________
Silver 2SS/RS Man/6
CTS-V front 6-Piston Calipers,
GM 3.91 Rear Gears
Sack Rat 2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 01:02 PM   #66
Aaron1121
 
Drives: 2010 CGM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: .
Posts: 80
Ted-

Thanks so much for volunteering for this test!!!!!

I have a suggestion for the testing:

There has been a lot of speculation if the restriction is with the stock headers, or with the stock cats. Personally, I believe the cats are 80% of it....

For comparison, when you do the test, can you unbolt the factory cats and use a highflow cat or a downpipe, or no cats, and leave the factory headers on for a dyno run?

This might give us a good idea of the restriction point.....
Aaron1121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 02:09 PM   #67
THUMPER20X
GM fix my PAINT U suck!
 
THUMPER20X's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 1SS/RS 6Spd
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Great Red North
Posts: 1,856
I cant wait, Im going to build my car with only bolt ons and see what I can get. Keeping stock internals. And when all is done then a tune. I did this with my 93Z and got a best of 12.3 with some weight reduction, boltons only and some killer driving. And the car never broke down ever. 180,000 and never saw a tow truck.
__________________
THUMPER20X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 03:03 PM   #68
petman
Proud IBM Owner
 
petman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS-RS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fostoria, Ohio
Posts: 114
as I see it, you can't even use stock cat's with LT's, I mean with out modding, so the assumption is he'll use high flow cats or no cats, and the stock 2 1/2" pipe and factory mufflers breath fairly well, so the headers should show differences
__________________

My Baby, 1SS/RS Auto
petman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 08:51 PM   #69
madmaxx18
 
madmaxx18's Avatar
 
Drives: 07_tundra/08_zo6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wichita falls, tx
Posts: 722
Hey Ted is Borla sending you out a set of shorties for testing yet? Has any other dealers jumped in yet? Alot of us can't wait to see a test done to see what the shorties really put out.
madmaxx18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 09:04 PM   #70
CWI
Helping Build America
 
CWI's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS,LS3 2013 Duramax 3500HD
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Freeport LPG Export
Posts: 3,836
Are you going to do multiple pulls on each to get a fair average?
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit, what a ride!"
CWI is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.