Mustang Pricing is Up - Page 5 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

wbt · 01-17-2010, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

ha ha you bought a 2010.

That is all.

So I was not singling any particular individual out regarding retarded information in this thread. I would have to place your post in that category.

So you are saying buying my wife a 2010 Mustang GT Premium that MSRP'd for $33K which I negotiated out the door for $27K was a bad move?

Mind you this was back in July '09 just after the redesigned body came out as well.

Good argument buddy.

Zeus · 01-17-2010, 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wbt

So I was not singling any particular individual out regarding retarded information in this thread. I would have to place your post in that category.

So you are saying buying my wife a 2010 Mustang GT Premium that MSRP'd for $33K which I negotiated out the door for $27K was a bad move?

Mind you this was back in July '09 just after the redesigned body came out as well.

Good argument buddy.

Did I say that? Can I get a quote? ......... Some serious retardation going on in here

lil_chef · 01-17-2010, 01:06 AM

looks like getting the 2010 was a good move for me then. if i were to get the 2011 it would have cost me 9k more dollars than i payed for my car.

a_Username · 01-17-2010, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Actually I think Ford raising the price on the Mustang is the best thing they could have done.

The 370z is by FAR the better performance car... in stock trim anyways.

The Z is faster, handles better, has higher higher handling limits, cool synchro rev match manual, and feels sportier... Its like the poor man's 911.

The Evo X is a great performance car (mostly aftermarket) but if we are going value for dollar, it shouldn't be who has the most aftermarket parts/who can void their warranty faster.

Really? Got an info to back this claim up

comiskeybum · 01-17-2010, 10:57 AM

this thread needs to be closed. its retarded and half the postings are not even about the mustang price anymore. its become another mine is better than yours thing.

jeffny09 · 01-17-2010, 11:15 AM

my camaro is better then my mustang! no your camaro is better then your mustang wait wait i dont own a mustang

baby02 · 01-17-2010, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comiskeybum

so now ford has a lighter faster car for a little bit less money..........booyah!!!

What ya'll got lost, or did your website move and you can't find it????

rodimus prime · 01-17-2010, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comiskeybum

this thread needs to be closed. its retarded and half the postings are not even about the mustang price anymore. its become another mine is better than yours thing.

shank0668 · 01-17-2010, 12:04 PM

Zeus · 01-17-2010, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_Username

Really? Got an info to back this claim up

Sure what do you judge 'performance' by?

(This the 370z vs. Evo X GSR... the faster of the two Evo's)

The Z will be in bold.

0-60? (4.7 vs. 5.2)

0-100? (12.0 vs. 13.9)

1/4 mile? (13.3 vs. 13.8)

Lateral G.? (.99 vs. .99)

Curb Weight? (3355lbs vs. 3585lbs)

Braking From 60? (106 vs. 111ft)

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...test_data.html

And this is just raw technical data. The Z is the more enjoyable car to drive, it feels much more balanced, and has that very cool rev-match manual.

Not to mention the interior materials used in the Z are light years ahead of that in the mitsu.

The Evo is a great performance car, but its not top 3.... unless we are weighing performance/practicality.

garagelogic · 01-17-2010, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Sure what do you judge 'performance' by?

(This the 370z vs. Evo X GSR... the faster of the two Evo's)

The Z will be in bold.

0-60? (4.7 vs. 5.2)

0-100? (12.0 vs. 13.9)

1/4 mile? (13.3 vs. 13.8)

Lateral G.? (.99 vs. .99)

Curb Weight? (3355lbs vs. 3585lbs)

Braking From 60? (106 vs. 111ft)

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...test_data.html

And this is just raw technical data. The Z is the more enjoyable car to drive, it feels much more balanced, and has that very cool rev-match manual.

Not to mention the interior materials used in the Z are light years ahead of that in the mitsu.

The Evo is a great performance car, but its not top 3.... unless we are weighing performance/practicality.

And it has two seats versus four.

Zeus · 01-17-2010, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garagelogic

And it has two seats versus four.

Which would only be relevant if we were weighing performance and practicality

nester7929 · 01-17-2010, 02:39 PM

NB4 lock.

This is interesting. The Mustang will actually be more expensive when the brakes the Camaro has are included. Not sure if this is a good move by Ford.

*CamaroSpike23* · 01-17-2010, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

And this is just raw technical data. The Z is the more enjoyable car to drive, it feels much more balanced, and has that very cool rev-match manual.
it "feels" is not an unbiased technical comparison... very cool features do sell cars... oooh, look...... shiney......

Not to mention the interior materials used in the Z are light years ahead of that in the mitsu.
transparisteel? unubtanium? mimetic polymers?

The Evo is a great performance car, but its not top 3.... unless we are weighing performance/practicality.

why limit our list to top 3. why not top 5. so that it looks better when you are the best amongst all instead of just a few.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

The 370z is by FAR the better performance car... in stock trim anyways.
Thats all dependent of your perspective

The Z is faster, handles better, has higher higher handling limits, cool synchro rev match manual, and feels sportier... Its like the poor man's 911.

Just like the Camaro is the poor mans corvette.

The Evo X is a great performance car (mostly aftermarket) but if we are going value for dollar, it shouldn't be who has the most aftermarket parts/who can void their warranty faster.

bang for the buck is the best comparison.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeus

Which would only be relevant if we were weighing performance and practicality

or if you were comparing similiar 2 door, 2+2 coupes.

if we are comparing 2 seaters, we can throw all logic out of the conversation and bring in a corvette and a sky to compare...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axe

......and kicking Camaros ass, saleswise, 99% of the time, since 1965. Sounds like a sore spot.

shame there wasnt a camaro out in 1965...

and while GM sold more F-bodies than Ford sold mustangs, thats what allowed Ford to sell more numbers than the camaro in various years. but dont forget that the Camaro had a sister car that it competed against as well.... since the mustang wasnt much competition.

cheaper cars sell to more people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragoneye

And interesting note is that destination is identical for both cars.

imagine that....

Quote:

Originally Posted by garagelogic

Nevermind. That post tells me everything I need to know.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bpmurr

I'm concerned that Ford is pricing themselves out of their target market. It's not just the Mustang as so many other cars are getting way too pricey. American incomes aren't rising as fast and any gain is coming from unsustainable high income Federal Government jobs.

but they arent the only ones that are going that route

01-17-2010, 11:15 AM	#62
jeffny09 Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: new york Posts: 5,618	my camaro is better then my mustang! no your camaro is better then your mustang wait wait i dont own a mustang __________________ top 10 reason why real men drive stick. 10. A manual transmission is the ultimate in control 9. You can use automotive jargon and not sound like a total tool 8. You can't spell "manual" without "man" 7. Manual transmissions prove you can do more than one thing at a time 6. You can't drift in an auto 5. You can't pull fancy moves in an automatic 4. You get better fuel economy with a stick 3. You’ll never look like a chump if you can drive stick 2. Manual transmission cars are faster 1. Women like a guy who is good with his hands.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3	Number 3	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	31	04-17-2011 03:24 PM
OFFICIAL 2010 Camaro Specifications (full tech specs PDF inside)	Tran	Guides, Manuals, Bulletins, Documentation Archive	394	06-11-2010 06:16 PM
Watch out Mustang	darthknight72	Chevy Camaro vs...	34	08-12-2008 06:19 PM
5.0L V8 could return in 2010 Mustang	camaro5	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	15	04-18-2008 06:41 PM

01-17-2010, 01:06 AM	#59
lil_chef Banned Drives: 2010 Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Jacksonville Posts: 1,823	looks like getting the 2010 was a good move for me then. if i were to get the 2011 it would have cost me 9k more dollars than i payed for my car.

01-17-2010, 10:57 AM	#61
comiskeybum Banned Drives: 2010 Chevy Equinox LS Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: South Bend, Indiana Posts: 799	this thread needs to be closed. its retarded and half the postings are not even about the mustang price anymore. its become another mine is better than yours thing.

01-17-2010, 12:04 PM	#65
shank0668 Drives: '14 LML/'06 LJ/'76 Trans Am Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ohio Posts: 8,438 View My Garage

01-17-2010, 02:39 PM	#69
nester7929 Rice Harvester Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008 Location: Plainview, TX Posts: 1,449	NB4 lock. This is interesting. The Mustang will actually be more expensive when the brakes the Camaro has are included. Not sure if this is a good move by Ford.