2010 Plum Crazy Challenger STR8

[Georgie]

simply beautiful

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by lil_chef

i said that i witnessed

oh and disclaimer: i am neither responsible for the shoulder rub or the donuts

too late...

Originally Posted by Stew

Off by 100 pounds there, camaro is right at 3900, SRT is at 4100, R/Ts have weighed at as low as 3900 pounds, but that is a different story altogether. THey are both heavy and both hide their weight well.

stew i love how they trash me but leave you alone....it's a cold world out here. but we just have to sit back and laugh at all the assumptions. it's real funny though.

Originally Posted by DGthe3

I'll explain it to you then. Its slower than the Camaro ... therefore it is slow.

that makes a ton of sense

it's slower by 1/10s of a second lol if that boosts the ego of camaro owners so be it lol.

and for the record I have always stated the obvious when it comes to the challenger, hence why I am still on this forum. But lately it has been getting real bad, so captainkevin to the rescue! lol

[Stew]

Originally Posted by Zeus

So you rounded up on the Camaro and down on the SRT? LOL

Basically, so 3888 for the SS and 4149 for the SRT, that should be better

Originally Posted by kevin2323

stew i love how they trash me but leave you alone....it's a cold world out here. but we just have to sit back and laugh at all the assumptions. it's real funny though.

It is what it is, I guess where I stand up for the Challenger and Mustang, it is confusing LOL.

[wbt]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

it's slower by 1/10s of a second lol if that boosts the ego of camaro owners so be it lol.

It is because of the above statement and those like it.

Completely inaccurate.

[1bad65]

Originally Posted by ViperTomcat

You can get Plum Crazy on the R/T. There is no SRT exclusive color, AFAIK.

I think..however, you can only get Plum Crazy on R/T Classic packages, not on standard R/T's.

I'm dying to see it in person. So far, the Deep Water Blue is my favorite color. But I've always loved blue cars.

[ssump29]

Originally Posted by Stew

Basically, so 3888 for the SS and 4149 for the SRT, that should be better



It is what it is, I guess where I stand up for the Challenger and Mustang, it is confusing LOL.

Still wrong buddy camaro SS is 3849 not 3888. Where are you getting your numbers. Now I see why no one pays you attention.

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by wbt

It is because of the above statement and those like it.

Completely inaccurate.

im speaking of the srt8...and if you dont believe facts then you are completely ....

[ssump29]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

im speaking of the srt8...and if you dont believe facts then you are completely ....

And what are the facts buddy.

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by ssump29

Still wrong buddy camaro SS is 3849 not 3888. Where are you getting your numbers. Now I see why no one pays you attention.

sometimes different sites have different numbers.....relax

geez i remember when I first got on this forum there were very very few people who started crap over a few pounds and liked all 3 cars and the debates were in fun.....geez

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by ssump29

And what are the facts buddy.

that the challenger isnt the boat that everyone claims it is here in the straight line category. it is neck and neck with the camaro ss. but im not going to get into that because I really like this forum, and although i know the mods love me here they will ban me if things get out of hand.

[ssump29]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

sometimes different sites have different numbers.....relax

geez i remember when I first got on this forum there were very very few people who started crap over a few pounds and liked all 3 cars and the debates were in fun.....geez

No it was the point that first he rounded up for the camaro and then down for the chally to try and make a point and when called out on it he still post false information to try and make his point. So hes not using any numbers but his own. He could go to the offical chevy site and get the CORRECT numbers.

[1bad65]

Originally Posted by kevin2323

that the challenger isnt the boat that everyone claims it is here in the straight line category. it is neck and neck with the camaro ss. but im not going to get into that because I really like this forum, and although i know the mods love me here they will ban me if things get out of hand.

Don't use that as a cop out. This is not Challengertalk. People here expect you to back up your assertions.

[Stew]

Originally Posted by ssump29

Still wrong buddy camaro SS is 3849 not 3888. Where are you getting your numbers. Now I see why no one pays you attention.

Actually was just rereading the Motor Trend handling article where they tested the SS and it stated the weight of the their 6 speed at 3888 so there buddy

[kevin2323]

Originally Posted by 1bad65

Don't use that as a cop out. This is not Challengertalk. People here expect you to back up your assertions.

holy moly lol. I have backed it up more than 100 times already....

the auto challenger srt8 does 0-60 in 4.8, 4.7 in manual......even the rt does 0-60 in 5.1......these cars are not as slow as many of you claim. Also im not going to sit here and say that 0-60 numbers make a car faster than the other. it does not....with these cars being VERY close in performance, it usually comes down to the driver. if both drivers were the same then the camaro WINS, but unfortunately cloning isnt mainstreamed yet so it comes down to the better driver. all i want is credit given where credit is due. Not this notion that the challenger is automatically subtracted from comparison to the camaro and mustang. i guess you can push it to the side when you bench race, but on the road there's none of that.