![]() |
|
|
#3123 |
|
Account Suspended
|
Well, I don't care. It simply gives me and my car more exposure on the board!
Or maybe WTF just wants to say he has a 10-second daily-driver, too?![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3124 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 754
|
Has that guy been banned before? join date says jan 2010...
I am going to assume he has just from the way he acts. recent join date/low posts doesn't that = troll around here? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3125 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 GT500 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago.
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
No, thats not my car in the sig. Mine doesnt look as good. But it is a TT gt500 too, if you can believe that. ![]() Hey logic, what ford sites do you post on? I dont want to get caught with your car as my sig. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3126 | |
|
BOOOOOM MF'R!!
Drives: to Chipotle daily Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flo-Rida
Posts: 3,614
|
Rape
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3127 |
|
Account Suspended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3128 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
but that would effect gas mileage, new parts, redesigning a transmission is a lot more cost prohibitive than a rear end swap and would surely be passed on to the consimer. Also, while a rear end swap may not effect EPA, changing all the gears in the transmission surely would I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3129 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 GT500 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago.
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
Stretch a gear here, shrink a gear there, theres tons of possibilites, although you seem like you dont want it to be done, I cant imagine why? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3130 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3131 |
|
Don't Like it? Suggit.
|
__________________
"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!" A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp |
|
|
|
|
|
#3132 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3133 |
|
Always On Kill!
Drives: S.I.M. SS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 780
|
I never claimed to be a drag racer, which is why I asked YOU OR SOMEONE KNOWLEGABLE to explain, dufus. Thx for pointing out the obvious. You wanna explain my initial question?
__________________
S.I.M. SS(L99):
*American Racing Headers (LT) *Magnaflow cat-back competition exhaust *K&N typhoon CAI *Aggressive cam. *Tune **Result**: 465rwhp/ 447rwtq. Satisfied. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3134 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Ummm.... Sorry, that is not true at all. As a matter of fact, there were many years the Camaro outsold the Mustang, not taking into account the firebird or anything else. So your fact, umm, not so much a fact. Nice try though. http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/show...uction+figures
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3135 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
Just because two cars trap the same doesn't mean they will run the same. I could show you differences of seconds in the 1/4 with the same trap speed. Last edited by Sax1031; 04-07-2010 at 06:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3136 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,418
|
The new 5.0 and BMEP
I submit for your reading pleasure a lesson on BMEP (brake mean effective pressure)
http://www.epi-eng.com/piston_engine..._yardstick.htm In short. For the 5.0 motor in the new mustang to break 450 torque it would have to exceed the BMEP of a formula one engine which is at ~220psi. As it sits the 5.0 is already at 194 psi bmep which is very astounding and quite an accomplishment for ford. But this is not so good for the outlook of future NA modifications and power output. BMEP = 150.8 x TORQUE (lb-ft) / DISPLACEMENT (ci) PLUG IN SOME NUMBERS AND ENJOY LS3 at 200 psi bmep (stock is 168psi)= 500 torque (Rather accurate here) 5.0 at 200 psi bmep (stock is 194psi)= 400 torque. At 450 torque the BMEP of the 5.0 would be at 224 psi. Discuss
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread | Beau Tie | Chevy Camaro vs... | 3644 | 03-09-2012 08:45 PM |
| Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? | 5thGenOwner | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 12-06-2011 11:06 AM |
| Official 2011 Mustang GT info released | nester7929 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 81 | 12-28-2009 04:13 PM |