![]() |
|
|
#85 |
![]() Drives: black 2SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
![]() Drives: black 2SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 284
|
This picture shows what am i talking about...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 754
|
That picture actually makes the mustangs rear look decent lol maybe it's the angle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
![]() Drives: black 2SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
![]() Drives: black 2SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 284
|
I see an aggression at the left and frightened smile at the right of the picture... I see terrible overhigh roof and like a family sedan big rear window at the right... NOooo.. Bumper can do nothing about it at all...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
The Camaros rear end isn't exactly anything to write home about, not the best design either. As for the Mustang, the rear end looks good in that picture, clean and aggressive, also it has a fastback roof so yes, the glass is large, it's been a Mustang trait since they came out and also that high roofline and big glass make the Mustnage a more roomy and livable car, despite being smaller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Big like a family sedan is characteristics the Camaro has not the stang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
The rear of the Camaro is by far the worse part about the car, in my opinion.
Looks are subjective though. Retarded to argue about that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
![]() Drives: black 2SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 284
|
Yeah i perfectly understand that there is no chance stang people will admit, how terrible mustang's ass is. And that the back part of 2005 model was the way more aggressive and brutal. Muscle, if u want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Realize just because you think it looks bad does mean everyone does, in fact I have heard more people who have seen them say the like it just fine and that includes people who are not only Mustang fans like myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
![]() Drives: black 2SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 284
|
And i can say (just an opinion) if u vote somewhere on honda site, 80-90% will say smth like: " Hey, what a great aggressive looking car until u look it from behind"! Even my friend ex 2005 model owner saying smth like: " Hey, they had to change the rear side , not to make it even more ugly..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
![]() Drives: black 2SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Belarus
Posts: 284
|
Yep i saw one and u wont belive, it was gt500. First and the last in our country , i think. Even in black with a stripes, nothing can help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| mustang 2011 camaro |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CAMARO WIKI | Tran | Wiki | 67 | 11-27-2024 09:02 AM |
| The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 106 | 10-19-2009 07:08 PM |
| Help the Camaro win Motortrend's Championship | truth411 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 56 | 07-02-2009 06:10 AM |