Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-13-2010, 01:01 PM   #1
Meister@Torq

 
Drives: 2001 Crown Vic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 974
Send a message via AIM to Meister@Torq Send a message via MSN to Meister@Torq
Torq Custom Mail Order Tune - V3.0 Results!!!

We had a car on the dyno this morning that already had a tune on it, but since that time we had finalized our 3rd revision of our custom mail order tunes and I wanted to see what the gains were. After returning the car back to stock with the SCT Xcalibrator, pulling the fuse (for those of you who still insist this is required) we made 3 back to back pulls and they were all within 3HP of each other.

After this, without any cool down, I loaded our Custom Mail Order tune for 93 octane (V3.0) and have picked up PEAK gains of 16rwhp and 21rwtq and MID RANGE gains of 35rwtq and 28rwhp.

Meister@Torq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 01:46 PM   #2
DSteck
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2006 Corvette Z06
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 587
That thing must have pulled timing HARD on the stock tune at 4k.
DSteck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 02:19 PM   #3
Meister@Torq

 
Drives: 2001 Crown Vic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 974
Send a message via AIM to Meister@Torq Send a message via MSN to Meister@Torq
Every single 6spd M car we have had on the dyno has the same power curve. There was only a few degrees of spark retarded cause by temperature and and "knock retard". We have found that the additional load on the car when using a loaded dyno will show these results (additional heat and load causing some "knock"). These are real world conditions
Meister@Torq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 02:40 PM   #4
DSteck
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2006 Corvette Z06
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 587
I'm saying it had to have started pulling timing hard from knock to cause that 30hp power drop at 4000rpm. Definitely not typical for a clean run to drop off like that (and I'm not saying a stock tune is clean by any means ).
DSteck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 03:30 PM   #5
Meister@Torq

 
Drives: 2001 Crown Vic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 974
Send a message via AIM to Meister@Torq Send a message via MSN to Meister@Torq
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
I'm saying it had to have started pulling timing hard from knock to cause that 30hp power drop at 4000rpm. Definitely not typical for a clean run to drop off like that (and I'm not saying a stock tune is clean by any means ).
Every single 2010 6spd M has done this on our dyno. What brand dyne's are you looking at?

I do not think you can state what is considered "clean" or "wrong". This is how the car came in and how all of the others have been run on our loaded dyno. The factory calibrations are JUNK

Every car we have done, stock has been hot off the street. The temperature with the additional load (because we do not use a dynojet) could cause the knock and spark retard. This is a fair comparison because I did not do ANY cool down's between the runs. It is simply calibration .vs. calibration. It takes 3min to put a tune on the car
Meister@Torq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 04:36 PM   #6
DSteck
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2006 Corvette Z06
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meister@Torq View Post
The factory calibrations are JUNK
I know, I am agreeing with you. Sheesh... settle down. I'm well versed in how calibrating a car goes. People are always so on edge.
DSteck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 04:56 PM   #7
Meister@Torq

 
Drives: 2001 Crown Vic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 974
Send a message via AIM to Meister@Torq Send a message via MSN to Meister@Torq
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSteck View Post
I know, I am agreeing with you. Sheesh... settle down. I'm well versed in how calibrating a car goes. People are always so on edge.
I am very settled and simply responding to your statements.
Meister@Torq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 07:41 PM   #8
2SSCAMARO

 
2SSCAMARO's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro Auto
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meister@Torq View Post
We had a car on the dyno this morning that already had a tune on it, but since that time we had finalized our 3rd revision of our custom mail order tunes and I wanted to see what the gains were. After returning the car back to stock with the SCT Xcalibrator, pulling the fuse (for those of you who still insist this is required) we made 3 back to back pulls and they were all within 3HP of each other.

After this, without any cool down, I loaded our Custom Mail Order tune for 93 octane (V3.0) and have picked up PEAK gains of 16rwhp and 21rwtq and MID RANGE gains of 35rwtq and 28rwhp.

I think the WOT AFR of 13+ is a wee bit too lean. I am not confortable with anything above 12.5 even though it may bump up the dyno numbers somewhat.
2SSCAMARO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 07:57 PM   #9
Meister@Torq

 
Drives: 2001 Crown Vic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 974
Send a message via AIM to Meister@Torq Send a message via MSN to Meister@Torq
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSCAMARO View Post
I think the WOT AFR of 13+ is a wee bit too lean. I am not confortable with anything above 12.5 even though it may bump up the dyno numbers somewhat.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. We have been tuning cars for 10+ years and trust our knowledge and skills.

Every engine is different and responds differently to both timing and fuel. We have found out how to make amazing power with optimal air fuel and timing combination's without harming the engine.

There is no safety issue whatsoever running an air fuel ratio high 12's and low 13's....and it actually only touches over 13 in a few spots in the lower end (2300, 3400, 3300). 4500rpm + there is not one point where it goes beyond 12.9

Even our own shop car that has had 90+ dyno runs, 100 1/4 mile runs, 10,000 street miles and 50 standing mile races has shown no signs of anything failing.
Meister@Torq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 08:43 PM   #10
ckaram

 
ckaram's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS RS, 1968 ragtop
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,850
Hey Meister, have you taken a run at the V6 yet?
__________________
1968 Camaro Convertible LS1, T56
ckaram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 09:52 AM   #11
Meister@Torq

 
Drives: 2001 Crown Vic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 974
Send a message via AIM to Meister@Torq Send a message via MSN to Meister@Torq
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckaram View Post
Hey Meister, have you taken a run at the V6 yet?
Nope but I would love to
Meister@Torq is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM Order Status Event Codes trm0002 Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 545 06-30-2012 01:49 PM
Did you get an order # or any refernce for your pre-order? D1BADZ Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 21 05-22-2009 06:39 PM
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on dieseldave24v 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 13 02-23-2009 07:56 PM
UPCOMING CAMARO IMPORTANT DATES CamaroScotty 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 125 01-11-2009 01:31 AM
FAQ's Angrybird 12 Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 1 10-14-2008 04:51 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.