![]() |
|
|
#4719 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 754
|
You have no idea what you are talking about, I don't even have to try lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4720 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
If you can't find it yourself, I'll be glad to help you. Last edited by 8cd03gro; 05-09-2010 at 03:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4721 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Challenger R/T;2011 Mustang GT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
Don't kid yourself if you believe the LS3 heads are far from optimal as well. Leave the stock valve size alone, do a good port job and you have some really nice gains. If you want to start talking cams and cost we can roll down that road too. 500WHP LS3 N/A is very achievable and will cost much less than the 5.0. That is fact. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4722 |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
"with bolt ons..."
They include superchargers as bolt ons these days?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4723 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tn
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
The 2011 GT-500 has a supercharged 5.4 liter engine with 550 hp now. It's over 100 pounds lighter with better tires. Who even says GM is making a new Z28? It's all speculation but Ford does have the new GT-500 with 550hp coming out anytime now. Besides the 225 hp 5.0 could usually outrun the Camaro's 5.7 liter engine during the 80's and early 90's even though the Camaro had 245, it weight more, was an automatic (for years you couldn't get a 5.7 liter Camaro with manual) and had better gears. The only real time the Camaro got faster was in 93 with the LT1. I remember articles saying that the 5.0 Mustang kicked sand in the 305 Camaro and 350 Camaro during the 80's and early 90's until the LT1 came out and started destroying the 5.0's. It's not Ford's fault that Chevy couldn't produce a 5.0 liter engine worth a crap. It's not Ford's fault that it's small 5.0 could run with it's 5.7 Irocs. Chevy always had to rely on Displacment to run Ford's smaller engines. I mean look at the new 5.0 liter compared to the LS3. 5.0 vs. 6.2, that is impressive on Ford's part. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4724 | |
![]() Drives: Ford Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 5
|
tune xpipe catback et tires new clutch Evolution Performance, Inc. - First 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V In The 11's! 11.82@118 MPH Pass and Dyno Video Making 405 RWHP and 375 RWTQ! Read about this car in upcoming issues of 5.0 Mustang and Super Fords Magazine! The Video was shot in 1080P HD, so make sure you pick that option on the YouTube Player if your Screen supports that resolution! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4725 |
![]() |
Chevrolet made an excellent 5.0 when they had to, and they put it in the camaro. Just not in the 80's or 90's. dz302 ftw.
yeah but other than that the 305's were only useful for boat anchors
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4726 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tn
Posts: 77
|
yota, I love that sig pic. Camaro and Nova look damn good. Look to be the same color.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4727 | |
|
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
IMO the Z28 will be slower than an SS with a maggie, or any other charger. And it will be slower than a coyote with a supercharger also.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4728 | |
![]() |
Quote:
thanks
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4729 |
![]() Drives: 89 Formula 350 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary AB Canada
Posts: 53
|
not with a 5 speed and 3.45 gear! 14.4 sec in 87 was hauling ass
__________________
89 Formula 350 with alot of mods
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4730 |
|
BOOOOOM MF'R!!
Drives: to Chipotle daily Join Date: May 2009
Location: Flo-Rida
Posts: 3,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4731 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2005 Durango/2008 Versa/2011 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 132
|
Lightly tuned mustang runs 1/4 in 11.82
No forced induction:
11.98 @ 117MPH with a 1.67 60ft 11.85 @ 117MPH with a 1.64 60ft 11.82 @ 118MPH with a 1.63 60ft I might be incorrect but their only mods thus far: Offroad x pipe custom catback Tune drop in K&N control arms ET streets clutch (because they fried it) . __________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4732 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
|
Didn't know lightly tuned meant everything cept F/I
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread | Beau Tie | Chevy Camaro vs... | 3644 | 03-09-2012 08:45 PM |
| Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? | 5thGenOwner | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 12-06-2011 11:06 AM |
| Official 2011 Mustang GT info released | nester7929 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 81 | 12-28-2009 04:13 PM |