![]() |
|
|
#6553 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500 Join Date: May 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 288
|
I can't even believe this is a serious question. I mean seriously??
If you actually had to ask this question, in all seriousness, then sell your SHelby gt500 and get a regular mustang gt. Seems the thing to do if you are an intelligent person. /sarcasm off
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6554 | |
![]() Drives: Black SS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6555 |
|
Tampa Gulf Coast Family
|
I think you're right..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6556 |
|
Our shop 2010 Camaro VS. our 2011 5.0 Mustang GT? EDIT NEW 93 OCTANTE Dyno charts!
We just acquired our new 2011 Mustang Gt yesterday and deceied to put it on the rollers right away and compare it against our baseline numbers from our camaro (LS3).
Interesting enough this was on 87 octane (the 2011 GT) as it literally has 37 miles on the car. We are going to race the gas out of it tonight and re dyno on 93 to see if it picks any horsepower up. As it sits, the Camaro wins on paper ![]() EDIT NEW 93 OCTANE vs 93 OCTANE ![]() ![]() More photos found here http://www.flickr.com/photos/ipsmotorsports/ Who wants to guess who wins, and what the mustang runs tonight ![]() Regards Last edited by IPS Brandon; 06-21-2010 at 10:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6557 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Black & Blue 1SS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Back In The Desert
Posts: 1,257
|
Nice can't wait to see the results.!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6558 |
![]() Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicopee
Posts: 42
|
IMO Mustang looks pretty good in this comparison. Running 87 octane on a green motor not even broken in and it's within 6hp peak.....all while lugging around less weight.
__________________
2006 Lemans Blue C6 Z06
1995 3000GT VR4-sold 2005 Pontiac GTO-sold 2007 Corvette Z51-sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#6559 | |
|
Quote:
However I drove both stock cars back to back, and its too hard to tell which one feels better per say. I will say the Mustang under braking is miserable and has awful modulation, that was my most lasting first impression. Oh and the Camaro is better looking IMO to Regards |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6560 |
|
How about a dyno comparison b/w our shop cars
![]() http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90056 Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6561 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
|
Nice! 6rwhp to the Camaro, goes along with the base ratings. The Camaro's huge torque advantage should help it though. Although I know those numbers can/will probably change with the 93 in it.
Questions about the Mustang. Is it a manual car? What gear ratio did you get? Also, what gear did you dyno in? I think the Camaro will have the quicker pass until the Mustang breaks in a bit. The Camaro by 2 tenths, comparing it's first run vs the Mustang's tonight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6562 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Yes the IRS will eat up more power than the SRA.
And those are not bad numbers for 87 octane and 37 miles. Also not bad for the Camaro either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6563 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6564 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
|
Quote:
Can't wait to see the runs begin, lol!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6565 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
Nearly identical torque and more power, of course when compared to weight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6566 |
![]() Drives: Black SS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 454
|
awesome. this is what i think everyone is looking for....true apples to apples comparisons.
also, i think the GT is meant to be run on 87 octane (like the "old" 3valves) which is why the dealer would add it to the car. but like you said, it should pick up a few hp with the 93. im looking forward to seeing what you guys come out with!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread | Beau Tie | Chevy Camaro vs... | 3644 | 03-09-2012 08:45 PM |
| Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? | 5thGenOwner | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 12-06-2011 11:06 AM |
| Official 2011 Mustang GT info released | nester7929 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 81 | 12-28-2009 04:13 PM |