![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,344
|
Quote:
However there have been tests done by Janetty Racing on the Camaro comparing no cats and high flow cats. Their results are posted somewhere here on this forum but they showed that no cats with a tune offer no gains over high flow cats and a tune. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield, Mo
Posts: 833
|
some of our states only have visual inspections. Im not saying I condone the removal. It can be argued that the sniffer sees little to no change with or without them. I have seen it first hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Drives: 2011 2SS/RS SIM L-99 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dunbar WV
Posts: 385
|
The law does have a provision that replacing damages factory components with aftermarket ones is ok I do believe.
That's how A lot of people get by with it and how some kits are 50 state legal. Just clog ur stickies and throw high flow ones on there and make everyone happy!
__________________
3rd Time is the charm
2012 2SS/RS VR 6M. Borla S type, Volant CAI. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Rumbly Bumble Bee
Drives: 2010 2SS Camaro Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,468
|
The Basics...
OK I'll sum it up:
1.) A straight pipe does not have much gain over a high flow (200 cell) cat. 2.) A "high flow" cat does show a gain over factory cats (400 - 600 cell). 3.) Running one "high flow", 200 cell cat will show a significant gain over a factory set-up consisting of two "standard flow" 400 cell cats that are plumbed-in back to back in the exhaust on each side of the motor (factory setup).
__________________
2010 RALLY YELLOW 2SS 6M
-OBX Longtubes FTW! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
I'm so JDM I have SARS
|
Does going with straight pipes N/A have a big effect on back pressure with the ls3? If they are as efficient and non-restrictive as stated I would imagine not.
__________________
RotoFab Intake, ARH Long Tube Headers, SLP Loudmouth I Axle Back, Custom 273 Cam from Cartek, Valve springs+seats etc etc....Dyno Tune from Cartek Performance: 480whp 426tq
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Spartan Performance
Drives: it like I stole it Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: aqua 2ss l99 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,215
|
ditto, if i stay under 20 tps., any more, and it might as well be wot.
__________________
May your exhaust note, sing in harmony with your blower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Dont H8 Me Cuz U Aint Me
Drives: 2016 SS Sedan, 2017 Explorer Sport Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,910
|
How come everyone including myself that takes the god forsaken restrictive crap off makes alot more power to the tires.. its not because you were holding your mouth right when they dyno'd it.. they are restrictive crap.. I have 200 cell count now.. with my JBA longtubes.. now those are efficient.. but thats not what we have stock.. its two 400 cell cats per side.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,165
|
After going back and looking at the info I think the test I was referring to was high flow versus straight pipe.
I suck again!
Last edited by Apex Motorsports; 06-17-2010 at 06:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 IBM SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 805
|
too late my cats are gone! i have a few more ponies now too, according to my butt dyno...
__________________
**sold** 2010 2SS/RS, 6spd manual, imperial blue metallic w/black leather
Blacked out tail/signal lights, 5% rear tint, 20% sides, Dynomax Bullet mufflers, Barton short throw shifter, Clear Image offroad downpipes |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 IBM Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW, Tx
Posts: 1,157
|
High flow cats (200 rating) are showing 20+ RWHP gains without a tune using stock mainfold and exhaust. That is definitely not trivial. Complete removal is illegal but I've never seen anything say what the minimum rating is for 'legal' cats.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS Imperial Blue | CAI Inc, CAI | Solo Hi Flow Cats | X-Pipe | Backup Camera | PDIM
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 677
|
I don't mind running cats, they are suppose to reduce harmfull emissions. If the aftermarket equipment is as good or better than OEM, it shouldn't be against the law to install them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Aftermarket equipment (high flow cats) aren't designed to work (reduce emissions) better than OEM. They're designed to flow better (make more Horsepower).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| STAY AWAY FROM FH DAILEY IN SAN LEANDRO!!! | Jeanius | USA - California | 9 | 04-27-2016 05:13 PM |
| JBA High Flow Catted and Off Road Mid Pipes - LS3/L99 - fits stock manifolds/shortys | MarylandSpeed | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 8 | 08-26-2010 03:42 AM |
| Catted Headers ?s | Matth3w | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 0 | 03-19-2010 04:34 PM |
| ADM / Magnaflow 3" system for the ARH Catted system - Pics and thoughts | Crowley | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 26 | 09-17-2009 05:51 PM |
| ARH catted system / Magnaflow 3" system / ADM performance :) | Crowley | USA - Texas | 4 | 09-16-2009 08:22 AM |