![]() |
|
|
#43 | |
![]() Drives: Whatever These Keys Go To Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Blessed
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,441
|
Quote:
![]() your point???? Modded cars Vs Modded Cars = ![]() Guys please stop taking shots at each other.... At some point agree to disagree... I'm not gonna waste a bunch of time handing out infractions. I'm not sure what it is about this 370z comparison that gets people fired up.... There are a few OLD threads on this topic... anyway... Me personally, I don't see these two cars as competitors..... For me there are too many differences.... But I guess the numbers make them viable options to the same crowd...
__________________
Click image to see build thread. PQ - "the love of cars. It's a boys first step toward manhood and a mans last hold on boyhood." Fbodfather - "We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name." The_Blur - "Let's not confuse competitors with equals." |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
LOL at most people here.
Drives: 2005 GTO,2006 M6, 2007 300 Touring Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 1,331
|
Since they want to do the math the power/weight still is win win over the Nismo. Nismo weights 3300 and has 350hp and 276tq. Tq sucks on that car. Camaro 3849 weigh and 426hp and 420tq. Nismo power/weight equal 9.428571429hp 11.95652174tq, camaro is 9.035211268hp and 9.164285714tq.
So the nismo off the line don't even stand a chance when both are launched properly let along does it have the high end hp to catch the SS. Nismo stands no chance buddy.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() Drives: 1SS/RS M6 Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 198
|
Wow, don't think this was intended to be a race thread. There's a lot more to cars than speed and regardless of lap times there's a completely deifferent feel to cars when one weighs 600 pounds less. The Z is pulling 1+g's off the lot and at 3200 pounds with 330 hp it feels insanely quick. No matter what you do to the Camaro it will never be as tossable, just plain ol physics...
Knock Nisaan all you want but they are the only car company that actually came out with a redesign that was more powerfull AND lighter. That's unheard of in this day and age. I don't understand why you guys get all butthurt any time someone mentions a Z car...
__________________
Gripping the wheel, his knuckles went white with desire! The wheels of his Camaro exploding on the highway like a slug from a .45.
True death: 426 horsepower of maximum performance piercing the night... This is black sunshine. |
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former) Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
|
Trying to get this thread back on track...
I cross-shopped the 370Z and the SS. Pros for the SS LS3 4 seats awesome styling Cheaper Great straight line speed Made in North America if that means anything to you Cons for the SS Big dimensions Not the best handling Pros of the 370Z Excellent handling Nicer interior Synchromesh transmission Slightly better fuel economy Cons of the 370Z Buzzy engine slower than the SS in a straight line no back seat Very expensive to modify horrible styling in my opinion Significantly higher price with options Chose the SS. The only thing that could've possibly swayed me to the Z was if it had a turbo engine. But make your own decision. |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2LT/RS Auto Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 751
|
I'll say this, it may be faster then then my 2LT, but for that price for a V6, I could've got the SS and still saved money
__________________
BackInBlack
Performance:Vararam cold air intake |
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() Drives: GTI Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Don't worry bout it
Posts: 328
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() |
for all the nay sayers please read this http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87749
and this http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ond_short_take
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
![]() Drives: 17 Camaro 2SS & 16 acura TLX Join Date: May 2010
Location: DFW, Tx
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
Infiniti G37 is the 330hp @ 7000rpm with 270lbs tq @ 5200rpm 0-60 in 4.9sec (automatic) 5.2sec(manual) quarter mile is 13.4 sec top speed 155mph. .91g without sport package .94g Apprx weight 3600lbs. Nissan 370z is 332hp 270lbs tq 5200rpm 0-60 is 4.6 for automatic 4.8 for manual quarter is 13.1/13.3man top spd 155. 95g without sprt pkg .98g with sprt pkg. Approx weight 3270lbs. 370z nismo. 350hp @ 7200rpm 276lbs tq @ 5400rpm 0-60 in 4.5 seconds quarter in 13.0 sec(manual only) top speed 157mph .99g approx weight is 3400 lbs. People tend to confuse the numbers since all 3 carry the same exact engine. All carry similar power but due to size weight. And varied performance packages. Each car has its own characteristic that is very different from each other. All these cars are extremely cpable and extremely fun. I own the first of the 3. Have driven all except the NISMO. The driving experience is totally different from the camaro. Both are fun but hit totally hit different parts of the brain. The Z is like formula1 and the camaro is like NASCAR. Both exciting but for totally different reasons. I've cross-shopped all these cars. I went with the G as a compromise between a Z and camaro. But I'm strongly considering trading my G for a 2011 camaro SS and buying a Z as well. As a true enthusiast, its hard having just a gt or just a true sports car or just a muscle car. All hit certain spots. If you are a real driver who maneuvers with great skill. A Z will suit your adrenaline rush needs. If you are a cruiser who rockets occasionally on the highway, but still appreciates a good handling car, then the camaro is for you. If ur a lil bit of both go for a G37 or even a genesis coupe. But if u have the extra funds. Go with a Z and camaro. You can't go wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2010 Mustang GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,823
|
Quote:
lol actually i test drove all three as well, SS 370z and G37. i went with the mustang as i felt it had the best characteristics of all 3 at a cheaper price. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
![]() Drives: 17 Camaro 2SS & 16 acura TLX Join Date: May 2010
Location: DFW, Tx
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
The NISMO is a manual, therefore it is up to the driver to harness the power to keep up with you. A NISMO, with a semi pro driver will put down 13 seconds on a track. With a proper tune. Alone without further mods, the Nismo will put down wat my G pulls and with the same mods it will eat my G37s coupe easily. So driver skill is a huge part of it especially if he is not a seasoned manual driver. Another thing. You can have a nismo but if you don't order that oil cooler and u been on a track all day ur losing power after 30 min. What was that NISMO'S condition when you raced it??? Lastly the advantage a Z has over a camaro is the 550lb difference between a base+sport Z and a !SS camaro or the 400 lb difference between a NISMO and 1ss camaro. What a Z lacks in HP is gets back in weight and handling. U can get a aftermarket suspension to run circles around a Z but what happens when a Z runs an aftermarket suspension as well? What happens when someone decides to gut everything out of a Z and puts in racing seats and he's 2500lbs. You can do this all day. So keep it stock or mild mods to be fair. I'm not knocking a Z or a camaro. Both awesome cars. But you gotta look @ things as a realist not a loyalist. 2SS army your posts are always so one sided. Its like ur always saying the world is flat even the the classroom has a globe on the teachers desk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
![]() Drives: 17 Camaro 2SS & 16 acura TLX Join Date: May 2010
Location: DFW, Tx
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
I rented a GT for a weekend n it rained hard during the night. From that point I knew I wouldn't buy a mustang. The mustang is great on the track but its a twichy daily driver. Don't care for em
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
I have run G37s, G35s, 370z nismo, 370z, 350z, vettes, skyline gtr, supras, roushes, gt500s, gts, and the list goes on and on. I'm being one sided because the SS dominates the Z in the 1/4 mile. I have gone up against numerous ones. A red nismo 370z and I destroyed it. I beat a 370z last week running low octane fuel, trapping at 100mph. I beat regular 350z by a second. I mean come out to the track as much as I do and you'll see what people really run. I go to a horrible track, so times are very skewed, but you still get an idea. If i'm running bad, and he's running bad, and I'm still beating him, imagine what would happen with my glory run. The SS has enormous potential for the quarter mile. We see 14s and then we see 12.8s from the L99s. With a simple tune you are in the 12s easily if you can drive. The engine is just fantastic but restricted to hell. I would like to see your g37s run at my track. I bet you'd lose at least 3-5tenths of a second. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Camaro... soon Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,217
|
SS for sure
__________________
2011 IOM or CGM 1SS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NISMO 370z VS Camaro SS | The Boat | Chevy Camaro vs... | 134 | 04-05-2010 10:02 AM |
| Wifes 370z vs my camaro ss | mr_desmo | Chevy Camaro vs... | 81 | 11-03-2009 12:31 PM |
| Why I Chose the Camaro SS over 370Z, 135i & Challenger | SS 376 | Chevy Camaro vs... | 20 | 09-11-2009 02:30 AM |
| Camaro SS vs. 370Z | CamaroEnergy4Life | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 336 | 01-24-2009 07:37 PM |
| Nissan 370z vs. Camaro SS vs BMW 135i | 4thGenRocks | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 60 | 01-07-2009 05:58 AM |