Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2010, 12:47 PM   #99
SchwarzerDrache
No, it is not an SS
 
SchwarzerDrache's Avatar
 
Drives: SIM 2LT/RS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 491
Ok, don't flame me for 2 a stupid questions but one I didn't pay enough attention to the stock box and the 2nd question is me being paranoid.

1. Does the stock snorkel/inlet tube just need to be lined up with anything or is it in the right place assuming the box is attached and the snorkel is pushed down to where it is not being bent or stressed/bent by anything?

2. The sensor wire originally was under the tube but with the airaid tube it had to go over top. It seems to be against or near some hot pieces engine this way, but I assume the wire is insulated enough to where this shouldn't matter. Is this correct?
SchwarzerDrache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 09:59 PM   #100
kga10734
Don't Feed the Troll
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT/RS & 1999 Corvette
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchwarzerDrache View Post
Ok, don't flame me for 2 a stupid questions but one I didn't pay enough attention to the stock box and the 2nd question is me being paranoid.

1. Does the stock snorkel/inlet tube just need to be lined up with anything or is it in the right place assuming the box is attached and the snorkel is pushed down to where it is not being bent or stressed/bent by anything?

2. The sensor wire originally was under the tube but with the airaid tube it had to go over top. It seems to be against or near some hot pieces engine this way, but I assume the wire is insulated enough to where this shouldn't matter. Is this correct?
The stock snorkel just sits there, no need to line it up with anything.

The wires might get hot but that shouldn't effect the air temps the sensor is reading.
kga10734 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2010, 11:07 PM   #101
merlin803

 
merlin803's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Summit White Camaro 2SS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 759
How often do you guys plan on using the cleaning kit to clean your filters?

All these extra holes are bound to bring in more dirt I suppose, lol
merlin803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 12:30 AM   #102
VR Baron
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
 
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin803 View Post
How often do you guys plan on using the cleaning kit to clean your filters?

All these extra holes are bound to bring in more dirt I suppose, lol
Good question. These filters, or at least K&N's, say clean when the pleats are covered in about 1/4" of dirt if I remember right or if performance falls of etc. . I will just watch and see. It should be the same recomendation as on the other open box cai's I would think. The only time my old k&n on my LS1 got dirty really fast was when I had a ram air duct attached from underneath and the airlid sealed to create a pressurized condition. It got dirty really fast!!
VR Baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 12:35 AM   #103
Toasty
Custom User Title :D
 
Toasty's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Summit White 2LT/RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 2,342
I've been following this thread since it's beginning, trying to decide if I should order the Airaid. I like the dyno results that Jannetty got in the lower RPM range vs the Injen. Problem is that I'm heasitant to order up an Airaid, and then immediately need to be drillng holes and modifying the filter box. It's for this reason I'm considering the Roto-Fab CAI that was just introduced. I know they didn't make it into the Jannetty CAI test, but the dyno numbers they posted on their own do seem to look OK. The numbers seem to give them not quite as much in the way of gains vs the Airaid in Jannetty's testing, but even Airaid's own dyno sheet is not as good as the Jannetty tests. (yeah, I know that different dynos/days/vehicle used can change the results)

So, is it really worth it to order a brand new Airaid and then have to hack it up to get the temps to stay more constant? I like the look of the Airaid a bit better than the Roto-Fab, but the pricing is about the same right now.

Toasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 12:42 AM   #104
merlin803

 
merlin803's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Summit White Camaro 2SS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty View Post
I've been following this thread since it's beginning, trying to decide if I should order the Airaid. I like the dyno results that Jannetty got in the lower RPM range vs the Injen. Problem is that I'm heasitant to order up an Airaid, and then immediately need to be drillng holes and modifying the filter box. It's for this reason I'm considering the Roto-Fab CAI that was just introduced. I know they didn't make it into the Jannetty CAI test, but the dyno numbers they posted on their own do seem to look OK. The numbers seem to give them not quite as much in the way of gains vs the Airaid in Jannetty's testing, but even Airaid's own dyno sheet is not as good as the Jannetty tests. (yeah, I know that different dynos/days/vehicle used can change the results)

So, is it really worth it to order a brand new Airaid and then have to hack it up to get the temps to stay more constant? I like the look of the Airaid a bit better than the Roto-Fab, but the pricing is about the same right now.

I had the same concerns but thought about it like this, the holes just make it more "Injen" like (and they don't have any sort of box), with getting more air and colder air but without the worry of having water get sucked in (whether it is a valid worry or not....) and the hassle of the Injen install.

I can't speak on the Roto-Fab but I was happy with the confirmed test results for the Airaid, and that was before any box modifications.
merlin803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 01:46 AM   #105
VR Baron
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
 
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty View Post
I've been following this thread since it's beginning, trying to decide if I should order the Airaid. I like the dyno results that Jannetty got in the lower RPM range vs the Injen. Problem is that I'm heasitant to order up an Airaid, and then immediately need to be drillng holes and modifying the filter box. It's for this reason I'm considering the Roto-Fab CAI that was just introduced. I know they didn't make it into the Jannetty CAI test, but the dyno numbers they posted on their own do seem to look OK. The numbers seem to give them not quite as much in the way of gains vs the Airaid in Jannetty's testing, but even Airaid's own dyno sheet is not as good as the Jannetty tests. (yeah, I know that different dynos/days/vehicle used can change the results)

So, is it really worth it to order a brand new Airaid and then have to hack it up to get the temps to stay more constant? I like the look of the Airaid a bit better than the Roto-Fab, but the pricing is about the same right now.

I hear ya, I wouldn't want to hack into a new cai either to make it "better" but as I already had it why not, wasn't going to spend another $350 on a Ingen for 4 hp max when I could do it for free(if I did get more?) Do know it responds better and exhaust is louder and deeper now having let the max air to get to the filter. As I have said before if we did get a power increase to be close to Ingen or CAI its only a small one that probably cant be felt but throttle response can be but not actually showing up as a power increase. We may have gotten one or both but will never know, maybe JRE can do the holes and retest in the controlled situation they have and we could find out(?)
I do like the Roto-Fab and what they did with it on the design, and you can color match which is cool. Power seems good so far. I will go out on a limb and say theoretically the Airaid design seems better then the other open box cai's other then CAI and Ingen. It makes the same or more hp and thats with it being a little strangled of air, get in enough air and it seems up close to Ingen's design I would think, again only testing will tell.

On a side note on power remember as you add exhaust, headers etc the overall power wont neccesarily stack up so maybe if you add a catback first you may only see 8-10 hp from a cai that makes 15 by itself. Saw that alot with the LS1 engines, LT1's too. That being said I saw alot people's dynos with the lower then advertized numbers but at the track they got times and mph increases as if they got the full power increase from just that one part . Kinda strange but
VR Baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 10:01 AM   #106
SchwarzerDrache
No, it is not an SS
 
SchwarzerDrache's Avatar
 
Drives: SIM 2LT/RS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty View Post
I've been following this thread since it's beginning, trying to decide if I should order the Airaid. I like the dyno results that Jannetty got in the lower RPM range vs the Injen. Problem is that I'm heasitant to order up an Airaid, and then immediately need to be drillng holes and modifying the filter box. It's for this reason I'm considering the Roto-Fab CAI that was just introduced. I know they didn't make it into the Jannetty CAI test, but the dyno numbers they posted on their own do seem to look OK. The numbers seem to give them not quite as much in the way of gains vs the Airaid in Jannetty's testing, but even Airaid's own dyno sheet is not as good as the Jannetty tests. (yeah, I know that different dynos/days/vehicle used can change the results)

So, is it really worth it to order a brand new Airaid and then have to hack it up to get the temps to stay more constant? I like the look of the Airaid a bit better than the Roto-Fab, but the pricing is about the same right now.

I had a buddy hold the box and I drilled the holes with a 1/2 inch bit in about 3-4 minutes. No big deal.
SchwarzerDrache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 06:20 PM   #107
Toasty
Custom User Title :D
 
Toasty's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Summit White 2LT/RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 2,342
Yeah, I am still leaning towards the Airaid.... does the Airaid air box go back further towards the firewall than the stock box? in some of their pictures it seems to, and almost looks like it may make it harder to reach the oil filter?
Toasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 08:25 PM   #108
SchwarzerDrache
No, it is not an SS
 
SchwarzerDrache's Avatar
 
Drives: SIM 2LT/RS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 491
The box is bigger so it might go further back but I really didn't pay that much attention.
SchwarzerDrache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 08:34 PM   #109
merlin803

 
merlin803's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Summit White Camaro 2SS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchwarzerDrache View Post
The box is bigger so it might go further back but I really didn't pay that much attention.
It seemed to me that the air scoop ends up in about the same place as it was on the original box, so I am not sure that there is much, if any difference in how close it is to the front.
merlin803 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 08:38 PM   #110
VR Baron
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
 
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty View Post
Yeah, I am still leaning towards the Airaid.... does the Airaid air box go back further towards the firewall than the stock box? in some of their pictures it seems to, and almost looks like it may make it harder to reach the oil filter?
The back side comes to a 1/2" from the + batterey post and is about 2" from the oil filter area. No problem with the oil change. You can alos remove the box if you want, its easy.
VR Baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2010, 01:09 AM   #111
kga10734
Don't Feed the Troll
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT/RS & 1999 Corvette
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Montgomery, TX
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlin803 View Post
How often do you guys plan on using the cleaning kit to clean your filters?

All these extra holes are bound to bring in more dirt I suppose, lol
The filter with the modified box shouldn't get anymore dirt then the others. It is now pulling air in from the same place as the K&N, CAI and others like those designs.
kga10734 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2010, 02:33 AM   #112
Toasty
Custom User Title :D
 
Toasty's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Summit White 2LT/RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 2,342
I wonder how much of the power gains that the Airaid has is from the box design or the tube design?

If it's the tube, wonder if a handy person could fab up a block off-plate similar to the roto-fab/K&N instead of the box
Toasty is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BBK Shorty Header Dyno Test Today!!! Jason 98 TA Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 74 06-25-2021 09:58 AM
Hot air Intakes -By Kenne bell ADM PERFORMANCE Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 66 02-08-2011 09:33 PM
Cold Air Intakes 2010 Camaro Blowout! K&N | AIRAID | SLP | Best Price Guaranteed! PM AutoAgenda V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 47 01-12-2011 01:35 PM
K&N Air Filter (Fits Stock Air Box V8 & V6) Nxtr V8 - Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons, Tuning Equipment 4 05-16-2010 10:20 PM
List of Intakes that will work with the TVS-2300 MagnaCharger JJ2010 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 26 03-19-2010 03:11 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.