![]() |
|
|
#1331 | |
![]() Drives: f150 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: san diego
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
the GT has virtually the same performance as the manual6 M3. that car make dew with 420hp and 295fl.lb of torque and 8300rpm. In the MT's comparo the main disavantege of the GT was its top end, the GT hit its rev limiter earlier than the M3 cutting speed build up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1332 |
![]() Drives: Slow Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Metro Chicago,Illinois
Posts: 560
|
When you look at the engine mods vs. the horsepower rating, it's obvious this engine is capable of more than 440hp and 7,500 rpm. They could have done that with minimal mods to the existing 5.0. This is essentially a 302R motor.
Just what the "red key" does, and what the final power ratings will be is anyones guess, but I think it's safe to say 440 is a conservative number. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1333 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
I will repeat this one more time, for you too ultraz even though you deleted your post. . . The 440hp # is based on "preliminary data" according to Ford and no car is required to use sae certified power numbers, it is always optional. We will have to wait and see some dyno #s, but I would be willing to bet a few bucks that the car is putting down more than ~420rwhp.
Last edited by 8cd03gro; 09-16-2010 at 03:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1334 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
I see the car making 420-430rwhp from the factory. And you are correct on SAE certs. It is always optional. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1335 |
![]() Drives: camaro 2008 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 4
|
It can't be judged.
__________________
Last edited by icryptic; 09-17-2010 at 04:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1336 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
I just wanted to say that I have no idea how much RWHP the Boss 302 makes/will make, nor at what rpm peak HP is, or even its redline.
That is all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1337 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Mustang GT Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 1,358
|
It's old, but since it was dug up....
I've owned a 2002 Trans Am WS6 and I currently own a 2008 Mustang GT (very close to the performance of the 2010 Mustang Realitively equal drivers- LS1 wins everytime. I've owned and driven both, I have raced several 05+ Mustangs with my 02 TA and I never lost. Stock vs Stock with equal drivers = LS1 everytime.
__________________
2012 Mustang GT Premium
Performance White 6-speed Manual |
|
|
|
|
|
#1338 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
As you insinuate at the end of your post SAE certification put an end to nothing, as of 2010 the Mustang GT was not SAE certified and I have as yet seen nothing that would indicate that the 2011 GT is certified either (although it obviously could be...still it would be strange that Ford would go through the process and not attempt to use it to their advantage in advertising) The GT500 is SAE certified, the Boss 302?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1339 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
with the information provided in this post i can, along with others, speculate that the boss 302 will indeed be underrated.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1340 |
|
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
First of all, Ford is not going to SAE certify it. The 2011GT isnt, and neither is the 2012 BOSS. the boss will murder the 2011GT and camaro SS easily. anyone who thinks cams, higher compression, higher rpms, aggressive tune, and tunnel ram intake manifold is going to add only 23hp is on crack.
in a side note livernois has a 2011GT with the FRPP BOSS302 intake manifold running 11.1 @ 124mph on motor. that intake will be avalable after the debut of the BOSS302. i will have it.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1341 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1342 |
![]() Drives: XK 4x4 Ordered '11 2SS/RS SW LS3 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Philly Area (I miss PHX)
Posts: 675
|
That exhaust is weird; two un-mufflered ports in front of the rear wheels and two "normal" pipes with mufflers out the rear...interested to hear that thing, especially from the cabin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1343 |
|
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
I tell you, it's got to be rough and expensive on those that just can't stand seeing another car with more hp come out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1344 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| camaro, camaro vs mustang, cobra, faster, mods, mustang, race |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 105 | 10-09-2013 03:18 PM |
| Does the v6 have enough power? | cstproductions | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 305 | 08-29-2012 10:27 PM |
| Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 | Number 3 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 31 | 04-17-2011 04:24 PM |
| Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) | gmag21 | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 23 | 02-21-2010 11:29 PM |
| The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 106 | 10-19-2009 07:08 PM |