![]() |
|
|
#57 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: ABM 2LT / RS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,391
|
Thats cool Ive only got mine to 105 and chickened out lol.. What can I say
If I ever get a nice long road with no worry about cops I might have to push it.. my friend got his SS up to 150 I was holding on and didnt get any pictures lol..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | ||
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Ordered 8/7/2010
(1100) Preliminary order accepted 8/16/2010 (2500) Order preferenced 8/18/2010 (3400) Order broadcast 8/25/2010 TPW 8/30/2010 (3800) Order produced 8/31/2010 In-Transit from Osh 9/1/2010 9/15/2010 Delivered!! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
C_H_E_V_Y
Drives: Velocity Yellow C6 Z06 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sugar land/Houston TX
Posts: 704
|
They are all governed the v6 and the v8 the ss is limited to 160 and the v6 is 155 it's not to do with tires or anything like that I'm pretty sure it's to do with engineering and areo dynamics plus gm limits all cars to what they think is safe there is a way to lift it tho manual and auto when u hit 155mph the car will limit fuel injection and air flow. No
Matter how far u push the pedal down it wount go anyfaster. ( I know this because me and a freind hit 170 in a c5 and then it was limited from there and iv asked the dealer to ) ungoverned the v6 hit at least 170 in that thread I posted earlyer but then the front cracked |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro IBM 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,282
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro IBM 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,282
|
Quote:
Last edited by nak3dsnake; 10-06-2010 at 12:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
C_H_E_V_Y
Drives: Velocity Yellow C6 Z06 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sugar land/Houston TX
Posts: 704
|
True but they asked how the car is governed and somone said it insent it is and yes the tires make more sense than aerodynamics but I still can't see a camaro doing over 180 I feel like the bodys just not made to handle that it's to bulky
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
![]() Drives: 21 LT1 RS M6 in SSM Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dupont, WA
Posts: 453
|
Tire speed rating doesn't have anything to do with hitting rocks. It has to due with temperature of the tires and holding together under the combo of heat, air pressure, rotation speed, tire construction, etc. Over-worked tires CAN and DO just come apart, even without hitting any kind of object.
Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro IBM 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,282
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
36.58625, -121.7568
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
![]() Drives: victory red 2010 camaro 2ss/rs Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: bismarck, nd
Posts: 125
|
If they had the v6 limited to 118, I would take it back immediately. My 2001 lumina with a ready to die 3.1 liter has hit 125 several times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '06 Pontiac GTO M6, '19 F150 2.7TT Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,424
|
Some of you guys don't have a clue. Manufacturers have been doing this since the '90s.
Why would they NOT put a governor on it if the tires aren't rated for higher speeds? if it's got S rated tires it's gonna be limited to that. etc. etc. It's not just the ignorance of some people, that can be fixed with education, it's that some are..........oh nevermind. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS LS3 Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southeast Florida
Posts: 1,309
|
Quote:
312 HP is enough to overcome wind resistance to 155mph, and if not, then they wouldn't need a governor anyway, would they? LS tires: T rating = max 118 mph SS/RS tires: Z rating = over 149 mph So why on earth would anyone drive an LS over 118 mph, even if they could ??
__________________
2010 CGM 2SS LS3, born: 4/10 Last edited by SSLarry; 10-06-2010 at 04:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
|
Quote:
swap out the tires for Z rated ones and remove the limiter and your good to go. everything else is the same as the other V6 models. now with that said just bc you can doesn't mean you should.....
__________________
2010 Summit White Camaro LS / M6 MRT V2.0 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
C_H_E_V_Y
Drives: Velocity Yellow C6 Z06 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sugar land/Houston TX
Posts: 704
|
it is the tire rateing but at a point it is just what they want their car to do.
My dad has a jaguar xkr witch is a supercharged rocket from hell its on perrieli Z rated raceing preformance tires and its limited to 185 it can surely do 200 tho. At some point it has to do with areo dynamics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro SS: All Out Bonneville Unlimited Speed Test | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 75 | 08-23-2010 03:49 PM |
| Top Speed of SS? | Kelton00912 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 352 | 06-10-2010 11:47 PM |
| v6 top speed | ihc95 | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 124 | 03-26-2010 10:23 AM |
| Top Speed? | Eski7399 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 44 | 02-18-2010 11:44 PM |
| top speed of synergy green? | streetsteve | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 23 | 01-17-2010 09:00 PM |