Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-14-2009, 04:17 PM   #85
LSxJunkie
Snark snark snark
 
LSxJunkie's Avatar
 
Drives: RX350
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 3L Hell
Posts: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxmonkeyracing View Post
I love bench racing. Everyone forgets all sorts of factors that add up to a great et.

Gearing, 60 ft, trap, weight, and CoD. Etc.

When someone throughs the weight factor around says a car can't do something, I laugh. When someone says it's all about the trap, I laugh. Oh well love bench racing we'll see who can drive these cars after we get them. People will be amazed at some of them. I gurantee it.
You forgot the X-Factor. DA.

You want trap speed?

RoflSupras. 11.7@145, because 1100whp doesn't come with driver mod.
__________________
What is this, CorvetteForum Lite?
LSxJunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 12:55 AM   #86
MrKrisSullivan
New 2 The "DARK-SIDE"
 
Drives: 2003 Ram HEMI 4x4 Slt 20in
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Augustine Florida
Posts: 89
Hello!!!???? Ummm 13.3 sucks in the quarter... R/T Hemi Challenger's are pulling that all day long... And i've seen some 13.0's and 13.1's... Man something is seriously wrong with those times... Or something is seriously wrong with that car... Everyone here "Bench Races" on this GXP LS3 and if that 13# is correct... The Camaro isn't gonna be a whole lot better... Pull baby pull...LOL...
MrKrisSullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 10:51 AM   #87
Hesh
 
Hesh's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
MrKrisSullivan Hello!!!???? Ummm 13.3 sucks in the quarter... R/T Hemi Challenger's are pulling that all day long... And i've seen some 13.0's and 13.1's... Man something is seriously wrong with those times... Or something is seriously wrong with that car... Everyone here "Bench Races" on this GXP LS3 and if that 13# is correct... The Camaro isn't gonna be a whole lot better... Pull baby pull...LOL...


I think you got that way wrong. If 13.3 sucks even tho Motortrend got 13.0 with the GXP then your R/T is even worse since they got a 13.6 out of the R/T. I think you are confusing the R/T and the SRT-8, that got a 13.1, still worse than the 13.0 that the GXP got. Heres the links to look for yourself. Now I am sure there are people able to get better times themselves for both cars, but here are the numbers for both from the same source.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ons_specs.html




http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...lenger_rt.html

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...t8_manual.html
Hesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 11:51 AM   #88
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesh View Post
MrKrisSullivan Hello!!!???? Ummm 13.3 sucks in the quarter... R/T Hemi Challenger's are pulling that all day long... And i've seen some 13.0's and 13.1's... Man something is seriously wrong with those times... Or something is seriously wrong with that car... Everyone here "Bench Races" on this GXP LS3 and if that 13# is correct... The Camaro isn't gonna be a whole lot better... Pull baby pull...LOL...


I think you got that way wrong. If 13.3 sucks even tho Motortrend got 13.0 with the GXP then your R/T is even worse since they got a 13.6 out of the R/T. I think you are confusing the R/T and the SRT-8, that got a 13.1, still worse than the 13.0 that the GXP got. Heres the links to look for yourself. Now I am sure there are people able to get better times themselves for both cars, but here are the numbers for both from the same source.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ons_specs.html




http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...lenger_rt.html

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...t8_manual.html



Yeah, maybe he is thinking about the SRT- 8 Challengers. In head to head testing the SRT-8 is pretty much dead even with the G8 GXP. But the Challenger R/T is actually slower than the 365hp G8 GT.

Road and Track (March 09)
Challenger SRT-8 - 13.2 @ 108 mph
Pontiac G8 GXP - 13.1 @ 109 mph

Motortend (April 08)
Challenger R/T - 14.1 @ 102 mph
Pontiac G8 GT - 13.8 @ 102 mph

These were head to head times (same day, same track).
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 12:02 PM   #89
CDBiker220
 
Drives: 98 camaro z28
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: pittsburgh, pa
Posts: 189
Why does so many ppl quote the slow 13.3 1/4...4.7 sec 0-60 times from road and track when motortrend already tested the car faster than that.

0-60 mph 4.5 sec
Quarter mile 13.0 sec @ 109.6 mph

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ons_specs.html

I have seen dyno's for the GXP it put down 369rwhp. most Vettes have been putting down 380+. I think with the 10 extra horsepower and 150lbs lighter the camaro will pull 12.8 or 12.9 in most maganize tests. probably 12.5's by an experienced driver with some drag radials.
CDBiker220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 02:44 PM   #90
Hillbilly
Rider of the short BUS
 
Hillbilly's Avatar
 
Drives: Ukon/F350(work)/Intruder800
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London, KY
Posts: 268
Lets see

What was the original question on this thread?
__________________
SIM with CGM rallieshttp://www.creativegraphicsvinyldesign.com/images/SIM1.jpg
Hillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 06:04 PM   #91
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hillbilly View Post
Lets see

What was the original question on this thread?
Let see? No questions were asked. Just the statement that the Camaro might not be that fast because the G8 GXP only ran 13.3 in one test. He also states that other cars on the market also run 13.3 such as the Mustang GT.


So if I correctly understand what he's saying, the 422hp Camaro SS will not be any faster than the 315hp Mustang GT.
Now that's funny.

I just love it when people take the slowest time they can find for one car and compare it with the fastest times they can find from another car.
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 06:14 PM   #92
Ject
aka Patrick
 
Ject's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro 2SS '04 Silverado
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Derby Kansas
Posts: 3,072
Send a message via Yahoo to Ject
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft
Ject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 07:18 PM   #93
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGOS252382 View Post
Let see? No questions were asked. Just the statement that the Camaro might not be that fast because the G8 GXP only ran 13.3 in one test. He also states that other cars on the market also run 13.3 such as the Mustang GT.


So if I correctly understand what he's saying, the 422hp Camaro SS will not be any faster than the 315hp Mustang GT.
Now that's funny.

I just love it when people take the slowest time they can find for one car and compare it with the fastest times they can find from another car.


ive seen 340 hp cars run faster than 400+ hp cars. there's more to it than just saying "well, this car has more power, so it should be faster"
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 12:22 AM   #94
r.i.p.01slpss
 
r.i.p.01slpss's Avatar
 
Drives: 01 camaro ss (R.I.P) 92 RS
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: S.L.C. Utah
Posts: 103
All i know is when GM was doing ring testing on the camaro they stopped taking mustangs on the runs with them because they couldn't keep up so if you think the mustang gt has a chance of standing with a v8 camaro when it has the horsepower of the v6 camaro, you're wrong. and the srt8 challenger is heavier but will still most likely prove to be close competition.
__________________
r.i.p.01slpss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 10:17 PM   #95
MrKrisSullivan
New 2 The "DARK-SIDE"
 
Drives: 2003 Ram HEMI 4x4 Slt 20in
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Augustine Florida
Posts: 89
I've seen time slips man... That's why I say that... I saw a slip from a fella over on the Challenger site where he put down 13.1 with the R/T... I've seen SRT Charger time slips in the 12.8 range... All Stock...Show me a time slip for the G8... then were talking...
MrKrisSullivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 11:43 PM   #96
Visual_Perfection
 
Visual_Perfection's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 Bonneville SLE
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKrisSullivan View Post
I've seen time slips man... That's why I say that... I saw a slip from a fella over on the Challenger site where he put down 13.1 with the R/T... I've seen SRT Charger time slips in the 12.8 range... All Stock...Show me a time slip for the G8... then were talking...
I think the point is that sure you have seen time slips of an R/T running 13.1 but that is prob. with a great driver, conditions etc.. If you compare an equal comparison, it would be the same day, the same track and the same driver. Like stated, in the magazines when they tested the G8 and the Challenger head to head on the same track the same day the G8 was quicker.. so moral of the story, based on those statistics, one could assume that whoever is driving a SHOWROOM STOCK SRT8 challenger to whatever great time they get should really be able to drive a SHOWROOM STOCK G8 GXP even quicker, same goes for the R/T and the GT.

That is kindda how I am taking all this..
Visual_Perfection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 08:59 AM   #97
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKrisSullivan View Post
I've seen time slips man... That's why I say that... I saw a slip from a fella over on the Challenger site where he put down 13.1 with the R/T... I've seen SRT Charger time slips in the 12.8 range... All Stock...Show me a time slip for the G8... then were talking...

You can't go by the fastest times produced by excellent drivers under negative Density Altitude conditions (cold air, high pressure, low altitude track, etc).

There's a guy over in the Nissan 350z forums that goes by Veetec and he has run 13.1s in his bone stock 350z. But as we know most 350z run high 13s or so (stock).

Here's a video of a couple SRT-8 Challengers having trouble running high 13s. It just shows that with average drivers under average conditions, track times aren't always the best.

SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 09:51 AM   #98
CamaroSSforme
Got my two
 
CamaroSSforme's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS - RJT/Black
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 430
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSSforme
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visual_Perfection View Post
I think the point is that sure you have seen time slips of an R/T running 13.1 but that is prob. with a great driver, conditions etc.. If you compare an equal comparison, it would be the same day, the same track and the same driver. Like stated, in the magazines when they tested the G8 and the Challenger head to head on the same track the same day the G8 was quicker.. so moral of the story, based on those statistics, one could assume that whoever is driving a SHOWROOM STOCK SRT8 challenger to whatever great time they get should really be able to drive a SHOWROOM STOCK G8 GXP even quicker, same goes for the R/T and the GT.

That is kindda how I am taking all this..
As a motorcycle track guy or yesteryear, I also have to point out the dubious statement of "bone stock" when we are talking about people posting track slips. Unless you were there and inspected the car...checked the rear end gear, opened up that engine bay etc...you can't actually say that. And...*GASP* people lie online and cheat in real life
CamaroSSforme is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shouldn't we be comparing this to the new Mustangs? StoutFiles 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 176 07-23-2009 05:26 PM
Time for everyone to help GM! Moose General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 34 11-18-2008 03:40 PM
New Ring Time for ZR1: 7:22.4 DGthe3 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 23 10-30-2008 04:28 AM
1/4 mile brooks Off-topic Discussions 2 06-14-2008 02:30 AM
Edmunds.com review of Holden Commodore... good info. LSxcellent General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 6 07-23-2007 07:49 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.