![]() |
|
|
#85 | |
|
Snark snark snark
Drives: RX350 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 3L Hell
Posts: 555
|
Quote:
You want trap speed? RoflSupras. 11.7@145, because 1100whp doesn't come with driver mod.
__________________
What is this, CorvetteForum Lite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
New 2 The "DARK-SIDE"
Drives: 2003 Ram HEMI 4x4 Slt 20in Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Augustine Florida
Posts: 89
|
Hello!!!???? Ummm 13.3 sucks in the quarter... R/T Hemi Challenger's are pulling that all day long... And i've seen some 13.0's and 13.1's... Man something is seriously wrong with those times... Or something is seriously wrong with that car... Everyone here "Bench Races" on this GXP LS3 and if that 13# is correct... The Camaro isn't gonna be a whole lot better... Pull baby pull...LOL...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
![]() Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
|
MrKrisSullivan Hello!!!???? Ummm 13.3 sucks in the quarter... R/T Hemi Challenger's are pulling that all day long... And i've seen some 13.0's and 13.1's... Man something is seriously wrong with those times... Or something is seriously wrong with that car... Everyone here "Bench Races" on this GXP LS3 and if that 13# is correct... The Camaro isn't gonna be a whole lot better... Pull baby pull...LOL...
I think you got that way wrong. If 13.3 sucks even tho Motortrend got 13.0 with the GXP then your R/T is even worse since they got a 13.6 out of the R/T. I think you are confusing the R/T and the SRT-8, that got a 13.1, still worse than the 13.0 that the GXP got. Heres the links to look for yourself. Now I am sure there are people able to get better times themselves for both cars, but here are the numbers for both from the same source. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ons_specs.html http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...lenger_rt.html http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...t8_manual.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
Yeah, maybe he is thinking about the SRT- 8 Challengers. In head to head testing the SRT-8 is pretty much dead even with the G8 GXP. But the Challenger R/T is actually slower than the 365hp G8 GT. Road and Track (March 09) Challenger SRT-8 - 13.2 @ 108 mph Pontiac G8 GXP - 13.1 @ 109 mph Motortend (April 08) Challenger R/T - 14.1 @ 102 mph Pontiac G8 GT - 13.8 @ 102 mph These were head to head times (same day, same track). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
![]() Drives: 98 camaro z28 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: pittsburgh, pa
Posts: 189
|
Why does so many ppl quote the slow 13.3 1/4...4.7 sec 0-60 times from road and track when motortrend already tested the car faster than that.
0-60 mph 4.5 sec Quarter mile 13.0 sec @ 109.6 mph http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ons_specs.html I have seen dyno's for the GXP it put down 369rwhp. most Vettes have been putting down 380+. I think with the 10 extra horsepower and 150lbs lighter the camaro will pull 12.8 or 12.9 in most maganize tests. probably 12.5's by an experienced driver with some drag radials. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Rider of the short BUS
Drives: Ukon/F350(work)/Intruder800 Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London, KY
Posts: 268
|
Lets see
What was the original question on this thread?
__________________
SIM with CGM rallies
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Let see? No questions were asked. Just the statement that the Camaro might not be that fast because the G8 GXP only ran 13.3 in one test. He also states that other cars on the market also run 13.3 such as the Mustang GT.
So if I correctly understand what he's saying, the 422hp Camaro SS will not be any faster than the 315hp Mustang GT. ![]() Now that's funny. I just love it when people take the slowest time they can find for one car and compare it with the fastest times they can find from another car. |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
aka Patrick
|
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 | |||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
Quote:
ive seen 340 hp cars run faster than 400+ hp cars. there's more to it than just saying "well, this car has more power, so it should be faster"
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
![]() Drives: 01 camaro ss (R.I.P) 92 RS Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: S.L.C. Utah
Posts: 103
|
All i know is when GM was doing ring testing on the camaro they stopped taking mustangs on the runs with them because they couldn't keep up so if you think the mustang gt has a chance of standing with a v8 camaro when it has the horsepower of the v6 camaro, you're wrong. and the srt8 challenger is heavier but will still most likely prove to be close competition.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
New 2 The "DARK-SIDE"
Drives: 2003 Ram HEMI 4x4 Slt 20in Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Augustine Florida
Posts: 89
|
I've seen time slips man... That's why I say that... I saw a slip from a fella over on the Challenger site where he put down 13.1 with the R/T... I've seen SRT Charger time slips in the 12.8 range... All Stock...Show me a time slip for the G8... then were talking...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | |
![]() |
Quote:
![]() That is kindda how I am taking all this.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
You can't go by the fastest times produced by excellent drivers under negative Density Altitude conditions (cold air, high pressure, low altitude track, etc). There's a guy over in the Nissan 350z forums that goes by Veetec and he has run 13.1s in his bone stock 350z. But as we know most 350z run high 13s or so (stock). Here's a video of a couple SRT-8 Challengers having trouble running high 13s. It just shows that with average drivers under average conditions, track times aren't always the best. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
Got my two
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shouldn't we be comparing this to the new Mustangs? | StoutFiles | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 176 | 07-23-2009 05:26 PM |
| Time for everyone to help GM! | Moose | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 34 | 11-18-2008 03:40 PM |
| New Ring Time for ZR1: 7:22.4 | DGthe3 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 23 | 10-30-2008 04:28 AM |
| 1/4 mile | brooks | Off-topic Discussions | 2 | 06-14-2008 02:30 AM |
| Edmunds.com review of Holden Commodore... good info. | LSxcellent | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 6 | 07-23-2007 07:49 PM |