![]() |
![]() |
#631 | |
![]() Drives: Z34 370Z Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#632 | ||
SS Lightning
Drives: An SRT8 Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cinnaminson, NJ
Posts: 2,285
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#633 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 95 civic Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Illinois
Posts: 5,796
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#634 | ||
SS Lightning
Drives: An SRT8 Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cinnaminson, NJ
Posts: 2,285
|
Quote:
![]() IDK about them adding IRS though
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#635 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
Without IRS its the same crap. With IRS it weighs as much as the Camaro and its advantage is gone.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#636 |
![]() Drives: Z34 370Z Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 149
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#637 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: vrooooom vrooooom Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Which is good, because it doesn't have a 400lb advantage.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#638 | |
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
Quote:
Depends on how you define "competitive." Sales is the area that GM needs to be the most competitive in right now, and that's something that Ford has never relinquished control of. People have never been shy about purchasing a Mustang with less power for less money, and it looks like history may very well repeat itself unless GM can make the base Camaro as cheap as possible. GM does have to become "competitive" because it is trying to take a good chunk of market share from Ford in an area that it has dominated for decades in sales. But I digress. A 400-hp Mustang would certainly be able to compete with the Camaro SS. We're talking about a difference of less than 30-hp with similarly-sized vehicles. Only the most experienced of drivers would even notice the difference in power between the two. A driver's race for sure. People look at the sticker price. That's what matters in this market. Unlike us, the average person is not out to get the most bang for the buck, but to spend as little as possible and still have a fun car to drive. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#639 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#640 |
![]() Drives: Comet, 61 original. Mustang 65 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: warrenton Va.
Posts: 10
|
nester7929, BRAVO!!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#641 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#642 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2022 SS 1LE Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, tx
Posts: 1,299
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#643 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Mustang GT, Kona, BBP, 3.73 Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 193
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#644 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 LPE 650+ CTS-V Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,640
|
I listened to motortrend radio last week and they had one of the Ford engine guys on there talking about the new Ecoboost 3.5 being built in Cleveland. He said the Ecoboost would be the engine that Ford goes to in almost all of its vehicles and didn't mention anything about the 5.0 engine. He mentioned that the mustangs would probably get the 3.5 Ecoboost also. I am a chevy guy all the way but the 3.5 Ecoboost TT engine looks to be a very good engine, it sounded very impressive.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2010 Mustang picture! | Twin Turbo | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 20 | 11-04-2008 03:01 PM |
Exclusive Spy Video: 2010 Ford Mustang | camaro5 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 8 | 09-01-2008 08:48 PM |
Watch out Mustang | darthknight72 | Chevy Camaro vs... | 34 | 08-12-2008 06:19 PM |
5.0L V8 could return in 2010 Mustang | camaro5 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 15 | 04-18-2008 06:41 PM |