Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-23-2011, 12:48 AM   #379
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeSS View Post
i might be wrong on this, but i feel that more people are putting cams into LS3s then l99s. i am not sure about FI. as i do not read those threads that often. but maybe we are seeing more problems with LS3s right now because they are getting modded more. in term of internal mods.
Very well could be. The VVT may have something to do with it. Which is kinda odd to me. An L99 gets much more gain from a cam than an LS3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarowguy View Post
It won't completely be an ls3....you'll be a step ahead tho...you'll have valve pockets.
Valve pockets?

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtrill View Post
LS3's have the lifter issue as well. I ended up with a new engine thanks to a broken lifter.
I had a warning by the lifter knocking.
__________________
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 12:52 AM   #380
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 c7
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by PQ View Post
Very well could be. The VVT may have something to do with it. Which is kinda odd to me. An L99 gets much more gain from a cam than an LS3.

.
true, but i think most shops like the LS3 style cam more. thats what i have learned. not 100% sure why though. maybe its easier ?
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 12:54 AM   #381
Toasty
Custom User Title :D
 
Toasty's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Summit White 2LT/RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 2,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by PQ View Post
Valve pockets?
LS3 pistons are flat top, L99's have reliefs or pockets in the piston head to accomodate the VVT range of timing.
__________________
Toasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 01:06 AM   #382
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty View Post
LS3 pistons are flat top, L99's have reliefs or pockets in the piston head to accomodate the VVT range of timing.
^^^thanks! Alot of people are forgetting this. And it's my whole point. The l99 can accommodate a larger cam because of the valve reliefs in the pistons. Which is a large reason why we see more ls3 failures. Make sense?
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires. SOLD :(
2000 1500 silverado extra cab SOLD :(
2017 Silverado 5.3 all stock
2004 5.7 GTO 78mm turbo
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 01:22 AM   #383
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeSS View Post
true, but i think most shops like the LS3 style cam more. thats what i have learned. not 100% sure why though. maybe its easier ?
I've heard the same. But the L99 shops like ARD and a few others have claimed that they can make bigger power using the VVT equipped cars. I don't know why. Maybe the piston heads?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty View Post
LS3 pistons are flat top, L99's have reliefs or pockets in the piston head to accomodate the VVT range of timing.
Ah. I've seen that. Didn't really know what it was for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarowguy View Post
^^^thanks! Alot of people are forgetting this. And it's my whole point. The l99 can accommodate a larger cam because of the valve reliefs in the pistons. Which is a large reason why we see more ls3 failures. Make sense?
So is this why the claims of bigger power made in L99 cams?
__________________
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 08:37 AM   #384
Nvincent4708



 
Drives: N/A
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 25,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarowguy View Post
So most of the failures are ls3's.....interesting. Any links to threads where I can see their damage. I'm interested to know if there is possibly a related trend.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...amaro+bit+dust


here ya go!
Nvincent4708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 08:52 AM   #385
Huggerorange73
Banned
 
Drives: The REAL C5
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Norridge, IL
Posts: 1,830
Send a message via AIM to Huggerorange73
Just to clarify the whole L99/LS3 cam gains.

Without an LS3 conversion, the L99 is limited to .500 of lift due to the fact that half the lifters and the cam lobes are unique due to the AFM. Also the VCT phaser causes issues with PTV contact with larger cams due to too much advance. Without swapping over to an LS3 conversion, you can't get as wild with your cam swaps, therefore you're not going to pick up anywhere near what you will with an LS3 that will allow you to run much larger cam profiles.

Another interseting fact is the L99 doesn't use the hollow stem intake valves...heavier valves can lead to bad things.

No need to harp on the lifter issues....I'm pretty sure we're all aware of those problems right?
Huggerorange73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 09:47 AM   #386
Nvincent4708



 
Drives: N/A
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 25,856
hey hugger. did you get the balancer off yet? If i lived closer I would've gotten you any tools you needed.

i actually modified a 2 jaw puller..put a piece of chain through the balancers backside and bolted the chain to the balancer.. pulled it right off, no damage or anything.
Nvincent4708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 10:04 AM   #387
Huggerorange73
Banned
 
Drives: The REAL C5
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Norridge, IL
Posts: 1,830
Send a message via AIM to Huggerorange73
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nvincent4708 View Post
hey hugger. did you get the balancer off yet? If i lived closer I would've gotten you any tools you needed.

i actually modified a 2 jaw puller..put a piece of chain through the balancers backside and bolted the chain to the balancer.. pulled it right off, no damage or anything.
I was planning on it Tuesday...then a brake job on my 02' Avalanche turned into an epic adventure.

I WILL get the balancer off tomorrow....The bolt is out, just need the right puller!
Huggerorange73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 10:24 AM   #388
Nvincent4708



 
Drives: N/A
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 25,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggerorange73 View Post
I was planning on it Tuesday...then a brake job on my 02' Avalanche turned into an epic adventure.

I WILL get the balancer off tomorrow....The bolt is out, just need the right puller!
I bet the bolt was easy to get out like mine.. The rod through the block sure worked better at holding the crank still than anything else

Post pictures! Curious to see what really happened here.
Nvincent4708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 10:35 AM   #389
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 c7
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggerorange73 View Post
Just to clarify the whole L99/LS3 cam gains.

Without an LS3 conversion, the L99 is limited to .500 of lift due to the fact that half the lifters and the cam lobes are unique due to the AFM. Also the VCT phaser causes issues with PTV contact with larger cams due to too much advance. Without swapping over to an LS3 conversion, you can't get as wild with your cam swaps, therefore you're not going to pick up anywhere near what you will with an LS3 that will allow you to run much larger cam profiles.

Another interseting fact is the L99 doesn't use the hollow stem intake valves...heavier valves can lead to bad things.

No need to harp on the lifter issues....I'm pretty sure we're all aware of those problems right?
makes sense
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 11:52 AM   #390
snowtrill
 
snowtrill's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 RJT 2SS/RS M6- Rogue
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 608
Quote:
Originally Posted by PQ View Post

I had a warning by the lifter knocking.
There was no lifter knocking until things had gone very wrong. From the point the "knocking" started to the dealership was less than 30 miles.
__________________
Power without control is useless.
snowtrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2011, 12:00 PM   #391
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowtrill View Post
There was no lifter knocking until things had gone very wrong. From the point the "knocking" started to the dealership was less than 30 miles.
Well, actually, I don't have a lifter knock.

It turns out that it was a exhaust manifold leak on my headers.
__________________
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2011, 12:43 AM   #392
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huggerorange73 View Post
Just to clarify the whole L99/LS3 cam gains.

Without an LS3 conversion, the L99 is limited to .500 of lift due to the fact that half the lifters and the cam lobes are unique due to the AFM. Also the VCT phaser causes issues with PTV contact with larger cams due to too much advance. Without swapping over to an LS3 conversion, you can't get as wild with your cam swaps, therefore you're not going to pick up anywhere near what you will with an LS3 that will allow you to run much larger cam profiles.

Another interseting fact is the L99 doesn't use the hollow stem intake valves...heavier valves can lead to bad things.

No need to harp on the lifter issues....I'm pretty sure we're all aware of those problems right?
I think most of us are taking into consideration of the fact that most delete the afm. I know I will remove all of that garbage when my cam goes in. And more than likely I'll have some lighter intake valves to go in and port the heads. I'll probably just pull the engine. Might as well put some good rods in it too while I'm at it.
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires. SOLD :(
2000 1500 silverado extra cab SOLD :(
2017 Silverado 5.3 all stock
2004 5.7 GTO 78mm turbo
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
blown up ls3 engine failure


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GT5 Camaro pics brantley847 Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 93 05-27-2013 09:35 PM
Over 230 Satisfied 2010 Camaro Customers! Paddock Chevrolet has 40 in stock NOW camarojoe Dealer Camaros for Sale 2 05-24-2010 06:58 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 08:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.