Apollo 18

[Apex Paul]

Originally Posted by camaroracing2834

If anybody is wondering how Apollo 18 was, in my opinion, it was HORRIBLE!. I was extremely disappointed!.

Once I heard the spoilers I knew there was no reason to waste any money on seeing this. The premise is idiotic.

[mothraisnotapokemon]

Watch sharknight 3D instead. It blew....

[camaroracing2834]

Originally Posted by mothraisnotapokemon

Watch sharknight 3D instead. It blew....

That one!, lol sh*t, I knew that one was going to suck once I saw the previews lol THEY CAN'T BEAT JAWS, SO WHY EVEN TRY!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! LOL

[2001ragtop]

Its funny how every SINGLE picture of the moon and it's surface look like something that came from someone's MIND, not something that came from actual nature.

Look its the moon. its gray. it has little circular impact deformations.

And behold it holds it's orbit while only allowing one side to face earth and NO OTHER MOON in the entire solar system behaves this same way at all. (and people ignore that?)

Then look at the faces of the astronauts. They always have blank stares. No excitement in their eyes. They look pale and filled with sadness all the time, especially Neil Armstrong.

We have a hubble telescope, but they don't ZOOM in on the moon's surface. it's always blurry and gray. It doesn't even look like the surface has any planet-like (organic) surface or texture. Every picture looks photoshopped or looks like a studio set. the pictures DO LOOK like the movie 2001: space odessey, but people STILL say its just a coincidence. (and Stanley Kubrick was so scared to leave his house he stayed there for like 30 years till he died.)

If we went to the moon, those aren't the pictures of it. Perhaps the real moon is so scary, that this is why the astronauts look so pale and frightened. (they don't even act arrogant about walking on the moon.) I would be telling stories about it every day and sitting with total strangers and telling them how it was. These guys went to the moon, then became reclusive and barely spoke to anyone in the media ever again.

If something up there truly scared them, then I can see why no one wants to go back. But to me they are acting like they just never went, and (perhaps) the REAL astronauts that went were part of a genuine covert military department of defense space program, where they don't advertise who went and who didn't. Because they didn't fly there for fame and fortune.

[2ndgenz28]

Yea kinda why I looked forward to other countries going to the moon, so real info can get out.

Russia knew there was water on Mars since the 80s, took NASA 20 more years to finally admit it. They knew it all along too and probably before.

[Gigachip]

Originally Posted by mothraisnotapokemon

Watch sharknight 3D instead. It blew....

I know the truth

[Padre]

Originally Posted by 2001ragtop

Its funny how every SINGLE picture of the moon and it's surface look like something that came from someone's MIND, not something that came from actual nature....

Then look at the faces of the astronauts. They always have blank stares. No excitement in their eyes. They look pale and filled with sadness all the time, especially Neil Armstrong.... If something up there truly scared them, then I can see why no one wants to go back.

I don't buy your premise. They look "scared"? Hardly any science in that. But from that you make some rather bizarre conclusions.

As to pictures of the moon, this was released this week (pictures from orbit of human tracks on the moon):



http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/...20102114.shtml
(CBS/AP)
Apollo moon tracks, trash in never before-seen images
WASHINGTON - A robotic spaceship circling the moon has snapped the sharpest photos ever of the tracks and trash left by Apollo astronauts in visits from 1969 to 1972.

NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter got close enough to see the astronauts' path when they walked on the moon. The photos also show ruts left by a moon buggy and even backpacks pitched out of the lunar landers before the U.S. visitors returned to Earth.


Go read a book written by any of the astronauts.

Padre

[FenwickHockey65]

Originally Posted by 2001ragtop

Its funny how every SINGLE picture of the moon and it's surface look like something that came from someone's MIND, not something that came from actual nature.

Look its the moon. its gray. it has little circular impact deformations.

And behold it holds it's orbit while only allowing one side to face earth and NO OTHER MOON in the entire solar system behaves this same way at all. (and people ignore that?)

Then look at the faces of the astronauts. They always have blank stares. No excitement in their eyes. They look pale and filled with sadness all the time, especially Neil Armstrong.

We have a hubble telescope, but they don't ZOOM in on the moon's surface. it's always blurry and gray. It doesn't even look like the surface has any planet-like (organic) surface or texture. Every picture looks photoshopped or looks like a studio set. the pictures DO LOOK like the movie 2001: space odessey, but people STILL say its just a coincidence. (and Stanley Kubrick was so scared to leave his house he stayed there for like 30 years till he died.)

If we went to the moon, those aren't the pictures of it. Perhaps the real moon is so scary, that this is why the astronauts look so pale and frightened. (they don't even act arrogant about walking on the moon.) I would be telling stories about it every day and sitting with total strangers and telling them how it was. These guys went to the moon, then became reclusive and barely spoke to anyone in the media ever again.

If something up there truly scared them, then I can see why no one wants to go back. But to me they are acting like they just never went, and (perhaps) the REAL astronauts that went were part of a genuine covert military department of defense space program, where they don't advertise who went and who didn't. Because they didn't fly there for fame and fortune.

[Berean]

Originally Posted by 2001ragtop

And behold it holds it's orbit while only allowing one side to face earth and NO OTHER MOON in the entire solar system behaves this same way at all. (and people ignore that?)

Are you kidding?

Synchronous orbit is the norm for satellites, not the exception.

[ewynn9]

Originally Posted by 2001ragtop

Its funny how every SINGLE picture of the moon and it's surface look like something that came from someone's MIND, not something that came from actual nature.

Look its the moon. its gray. it has little circular impact deformations.

And behold it holds it's orbit while only allowing one side to face earth and NO OTHER MOON in the entire solar system behaves this same way at all. (and people ignore that?)

Then look at the faces of the astronauts. They always have blank stares. No excitement in their eyes. They look pale and filled with sadness all the time, especially Neil Armstrong.

We have a hubble telescope, but they don't ZOOM in on the moon's surface. it's always blurry and gray. It doesn't even look like the surface has any planet-like (organic) surface or texture. Every picture looks photoshopped or looks like a studio set. the pictures DO LOOK like the movie 2001: space odessey, but people STILL say its just a coincidence. (and Stanley Kubrick was so scared to leave his house he stayed there for like 30 years till he died.)

If we went to the moon, those aren't the pictures of it. Perhaps the real moon is so scary, that this is why the astronauts look so pale and frightened. (they don't even act arrogant about walking on the moon.) I would be telling stories about it every day and sitting with total strangers and telling them how it was. These guys went to the moon, then became reclusive and barely spoke to anyone in the media ever again.

If something up there truly scared them, then I can see why no one wants to go back. But to me they are acting like they just never went, and (perhaps) the REAL astronauts that went were part of a genuine covert military department of defense space program, where they don't advertise who went and who didn't. Because they didn't fly there for fame and fortune.

The theory about the moon landing being fake is more believable than what you just wrote......

[PoorMansCamaro]

Movie was terrible. Glad I watched it for free lol.

[2001ragtop]

Originally Posted by Padre

I don't buy your premise. They look "scared"? Hardly any science in that. But from that you make some rather bizarre conclusions.

As to pictures of the moon, this was released this week (pictures from orbit of human tracks on the moon):

Attachment 285153

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/...20102114.shtml
(CBS/AP)
Apollo moon tracks, trash in never before-seen images
WASHINGTON - A robotic spaceship circling the moon has snapped the sharpest photos ever of the tracks and trash left by Apollo astronauts in visits from 1969 to 1972.

NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter got close enough to see the astronauts' path when they walked on the moon. The photos also show ruts left by a moon buggy and even backpacks pitched out of the lunar landers before the U.S. visitors returned to Earth.

Go read a book written by any of the astronauts.

Padre

Why is this picture in black and white? ITS 2011 and we CAN'T get a COLOR photo of the moon? (from a robotic spaceship?) THEY DIDN'T PUT A COLOR CAMERA ?

The total cost of the mission is reported as US $583 million, of which $504 million pertains to the main LRO probe and $79 million to the LCROSS satellite, AND THE CAMERA IS BLACK AND WHITE ? LOL

[Padre]

Originally Posted by 2001ragtop

Why is this picture in black and white? ITS 2011 and we CAN'T get a COLOR photo of the moon? (from a robotic spaceship?) THEY DIDN'T PUT A COLOR CAMERA ?

Yet again, No one notices that you are NOT EVEN GETTING TO SEE the moon in color and NOBODY complains about it.

It is in color. That's the color of the moon.

http://www.lroc.asu.edu/EPO/LROC/lroc.php
LROC is a modified version of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiters ConTeXt Camera (CTX) and MARs Color Imager (MARCI) provided by Malin Space Science Systems (MSSS) in San Diego, CA.

Padre

[2001ragtop]

Originally Posted by Padre

It is in color. That's the color of the moon.

http://www.lroc.asu.edu/EPO/LROC/lroc.php
LROC is a modified version of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiters ConTeXt Camera (CTX) and MARs Color Imager (MARCI) provided by Malin Space Science Systems (MSSS) in San Diego, CA.

Padre

That picture is black and white.