09-14-2011, 03:35 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 236
|
Help with Hi-flow cats vs No Cats
So I am getting 7/8 LT headers but idk if i should get hi flows or no cats. Whats the difference when it comes to power gains and sound? Will it be so loud without cats that you can't even have a conversation inside the car?
|
09-14-2011, 03:37 PM | #2 |
knows 2 facts about ducks
Drives: ...and they're both wrong Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The HMS Invincible
Posts: 25,072
|
Jannetty Racing did a test on this. There are no noticeable performance gains in using off-road pipes (no cats) over high flow cats. If you go with no cats it will sound a bit raspier (my opinion), and your car will smell (fact). The smell is unburnt fuel, oil, etc. Whether it will be too loud inside the cabin or not, that's really dependent on what exhaust you get. The cats don't really have much play in the amount of drone a system has.
|
09-14-2011, 03:38 PM | #3 |
Banned
|
hey arsenal i am catless...with stock manifolds, and mufflers sounds...perfect...loud but not tacky and old sounding...here my sound clip video.
http://s858.photobucket.com/albums/ab145/angelpapi007/ |
09-14-2011, 03:47 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
i think its better to go with cats. wont smell, and its gives a cleaner sound.
|
09-14-2011, 03:50 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2012 45th Camaro L99 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 119
|
All depends...I'm catless and love the deeper sound better. I'm used to the smell having owned race cars and whatnot previously. It's not bad at all to me FWIW. It's not extremely loud in the car, depends on how you drive it as well. The most annoying thing is the DOD kicking in more than anything.
I've seen similar dyno's showing nominal differences between a hi-flow catted system with longtubes versus a catless longtube system. If you're talking about STOCK cats, then hell yes there is more power to be had, they are very restrictive.
__________________
2012 45th L99 Camaro 2SS/RS
2015 Cadillac Escalade |
09-14-2011, 03:58 PM | #6 |
Drives: VR 2010 Camaro SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 132
|
I run catless, with flowmaster outlaws and love the sound. The smell is not all that bad, that being said it will fail any sort of emissions testing.
|
09-14-2011, 04:02 PM | #7 | |
Drives: 2012 45th Camaro L99 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 119
|
Quote:
Of course with a system that allows you to swap off-road pipes and cats you could always swap them out before you get inspected in states that sniff and/or do a physical check.
__________________
2012 45th L99 Camaro 2SS/RS
2015 Cadillac Escalade |
|
09-14-2011, 04:24 PM | #8 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 2SS CAMARO 45th Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 18,663
|
Keep that cats and stay some what legal. There isn't any reason to ditch them unless you're planning to be over 700 horsepower some time soon!
|
09-14-2011, 05:22 PM | #9 |
Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 236
|
haha all the info i needed to know . I was going to go with hi-flows, was just making sure I am not sacrificing any significant power for them. Also the smell does get a bit annoying sometimes. Thanks again for the feedback
|
09-14-2011, 06:11 PM | #10 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: KILLEEN,TX
Posts: 79
|
I have high flow cats my neighbor dont but he has been that way for a year and he is actually going to be putting some on due to the smell. His sounds different than mine but I dont have the smell.
|
09-14-2011, 06:32 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2010 CGM Camaro 2SS/RS 429 LSX/F1X Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 429
|
Yeah, I'd go with high flow cats. As has been said, we've verified on the dyno, high flow vs no cat has very little change, maybe 3 hp on a good day.
Due to this, emissions, smell, and sound, I recommend getting high flow cats to everyone we sell long tubes to. The loudness of no cats is kinda cool at idle and light throttle, but at heavy throttle and WOT, its too loud and raspy IMO. |
09-14-2011, 06:48 PM | #12 |
Drives: 2013 Corvette GS Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 123
|
We only see a couple rwhp difference between good high flow cats like the ones we use and no cats. I personally run cats on my cars.
|
09-14-2011, 07:20 PM | #13 |
Drives: C6 Z06 Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 109
|
I don't run cats, it was more money I could put towards something else.
|
09-14-2011, 07:25 PM | #14 | |
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,179
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solo Performance LS3 and L99 High Flow Cats | GOINGSOLO2 | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 169 | 04-20-2015 06:15 PM |
Help regarding high flow cats and headers | Rabamaro | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 6 | 01-30-2011 09:20 PM |
LTs+cats versus high flow cats only | Fraxum | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 12 | 01-23-2011 12:01 PM |
kooks high flow cats | Alain | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 15 | 01-10-2011 09:12 AM |
Kooks high flow cats | Alain | V8 - Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons, Tuning Equipment | 0 | 01-08-2011 07:28 PM |