DynoJet = Lower numbers? - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

RedRocketSS · 03-08-2012, 07:35 PM

Just wondering if DynoJet numbers are low compared to other dynos?

I just got my SS dynoed and was pretty amazed at how low they were. I was definitely expecting higher numbers than 337/360. Only mods are CAI with scoop, ported TB, and axelback exhaust, Yes i know these arent gunna add a whole lot of power to begin with but i figured itd be higher..

RedRocketSS · 03-09-2012, 02:15 PM

Lol anyone?

BullF-16 · 03-09-2012, 02:36 PM

A6 or M6? If M6 they are low if A6...about right

JANNETTYRACING · 03-09-2012, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedRocketSS

Just wondering if DynoJet numbers are low compared to other dynos?

I just got my SS dynoed and was pretty amazed at how low they were. I was definitely expecting higher numbers than 337/360. Only mods are CAI with scoop, ported TB, and axelback exhaust, Yes i know these arent gunna add a whole lot of power to begin with but i figured itd be higher..

Automatic, High Temps, humidity, High altitude and 91 octane all play a roll in Low Power numbers.

At Sea Level in 60 degree Dry air they make 330-340 RWHP All Stock.

bmorecam · 03-09-2012, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedRocketSS

Just wondering if DynoJet numbers are low compared to other dynos?

I just got my SS dynoed and was pretty amazed at how low they were. I was definitely expecting higher numbers than 337/360. Only mods are CAI with scoop, ported TB, and axelback exhaust, Yes i know these arent gunna add a whole lot of power to begin with but i figured itd be higher..

That doesn't look that low now LOL. You have some V8 guys that dyno in the 290's stock on a dynojet. A dyno is not a tool to measure your overall exact horsepower. Some will come close, and some too high or too low. Don't trust dyno numbers in knowing your overall hp/tq, dyno is a tuning tool to measure your modifications.

RedRocketSS · 03-09-2012, 08:08 PM

yeah its A6, thanks guys. i try not to pay too much attention to the numbers but its hard when higher numbers=usually faster lol.

BullF-16 · 03-09-2012, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedRocketSS

yeah its A6, thanks guys. i try not to pay too much attention to the numbers but its hard when higher numbers=usually faster lol.

You're pretty much spot on for an A6. they make 25 less than an M6. My initial dyno with catback and CAI was 358 rwhp on a dynocom....man that was a long time ago....7 months!

I also only had 600 miles at the time which affects it a little.

How many miles on your motor? If less that a few grand then it will loosen up a bit. Dont get wrapped up in the numbers though as you mentioned. Use the dyno as a tool and try to always use the same one after each mod

E.T. · 03-09-2012, 10:20 PM

Have you gotten it tuned? That would probably optimize your mods and unleash some extra HP/TQ. It really helps the auto tranny, too.

RedRocketSS · 03-10-2012, 01:16 AM

roughly 10k miles and im sorry i should have said those numbers are with it tuned.

SGOS252382 · 03-10-2012, 07:51 AM

You're good. You should be worried if you only made 290 rwhp. There have been L99 A6s producing numbers this low. I talked to a guy who said his L99 A6 only made 290 rwhp and he wanted to take his car back to the dealer.

He ended up getting his car tuned by a local tuner, and his numbers jumped to the 330s range.

Slowhawk · 03-10-2012, 07:53 AM

numbers look to be close. ussually the torque and hp is alot closer.

RedRocketSS · 03-10-2012, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SGOS252382

You're good. You should be worried if you only made 290 rwhp. There have been L99 A6s producing numbers this low. I talked to a guy who said his L99 A6 only made 290 rwhp and he wanted to take his car back to the dealer.

He ended up getting his car tuned by a local tuner, and his numbers jumped to the 330s range.

wow thats insane...id wanna take it back too!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slowhawk

numbers look to be close. ussually the torque and hp is alot closer.

i thought this as well. but sounds like my numbers are right there and the car runs really well now so im not too worried!

bmorecam · 03-10-2012, 04:02 PM

Just because a guy make 290 on the dyno does not mean his car is really making 290hp LOL. You just have to understand how dynos work and what it was meant for. If you guys come out of a dyno with 360hp stock would you say that you need to take it back to the dealer? Some dynos will produce low numbers and some high, and some just about right. There's just no way to perfectly calculate your exact hp/tq on a dyno. It can come close but it will never be perfect on the money.

SGOS252382 · 03-10-2012, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmorecam

Just because a guy make 290 on the dyno does not mean his car is really making 290hp LOL. You just have to understand how dynos work and what it was meant for. If you guys come out of a dyno with 360hp stock would you say that you need to take it back to the dealer? Some dynos will produce low numbers and some high, and some just about right. There's just no way to perfectly calculate your exact hp/tq on a dyno. It can come close but it will never be perfect on the money.

Yes, that is true. You do need to look at the dyno being used and what kind of correction factor being used.
But there are cases where cars are only making 290s rwhp on Dyno Jets (SAE corrected numbers). These same dynos are producing 320 rwhp (bone stock) with other L99 A6s running on them.

I also chatted with a local guy and his car also dynoed in the 290s (Dyno Jet SAE corrected). His car is now modded (intake, full exhaust with long tubes, and tune) and is making in the 360s rwhp/370 lb ft. (which is right where he should be for his mods).

For some reason, don't know if it's still the low octane tune issue, but some L99s dyno real low.

03-08-2012, 07:35 PM	#1
RedRocketSS BSHU Drives: 2011 Red Jewel SS Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Phoenix Posts: 187	DynoJet = Lower numbers? Just wondering if DynoJet numbers are low compared to other dynos? I just got my SS dynoed and was pretty amazed at how low they were. I was definitely expecting higher numbers than 337/360. Only mods are CAI with scoop, ported TB, and axelback exhaust, Yes i know these arent gunna add a whole lot of power to begin with but i figured itd be higher.. __________________ CAI and Ported TB,Loud Pedal Motorsports Tune, Pfadt Lowering Springs, and more.

03-09-2012, 02:15 PM	#2
RedRocketSS BSHU Drives: 2011 Red Jewel SS Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Phoenix Posts: 187	Lol anyone? __________________ CAI and Ported TB,Loud Pedal Motorsports Tune, Pfadt Lowering Springs, and more.

03-09-2012, 02:36 PM	#3
BullF-16 USAF retired! Thank God! Drives: 2011 1SS, 1LT red,1LT/RS SGM 98Z28 Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: North Texas Posts: 2,799	A6 or M6? If M6 they are low if A6...about right __________________ HKE LSX427(Mast blk lbl 305 6bolt LS7heads, PatG231/246 blower cam, RWHP/TQ: 1281/1133 SNL Performance Custom Twin PT6766 BB turbos 4 to 25psi selectable on the Boost Leash controller, Squash dual 400LPH/ID2000s, ALKY 4 gal meth, Autometer AFR/Bst/oilpres/oiltemp/fuelpress gauges, Pedders Justice road crs pkg: All HD bushes, supercar 12kg coil overs, supercar ZL1 sways, camber plates all setup by JusticePete! :Gforce 9" 35spline S-Trac, 1500hp Outlaw axles, 3.5"alum DS, Monster Triple disc; 4xForgeline 19x10.5 4xBridgestone 305/30R19 RE-11, CTS-v calipers/rotors/Cobalt friction XR1/3 pads

03-09-2012, 08:08 PM	#6
RedRocketSS BSHU Drives: 2011 Red Jewel SS Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Phoenix Posts: 187	yeah its A6, thanks guys. i try not to pay too much attention to the numbers but its hard when higher numbers=usually faster lol. __________________ CAI and Ported TB,Loud Pedal Motorsports Tune, Pfadt Lowering Springs, and more.

03-09-2012, 10:20 PM	#8
E.T. Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Cleveland, OH Posts: 3,273	Have you gotten it tuned? That would probably optimize your mods and unleash some extra HP/TQ. It really helps the auto tranny, too. __________________

03-10-2012, 01:16 AM	#9
RedRocketSS BSHU Drives: 2011 Red Jewel SS Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Phoenix Posts: 187	roughly 10k miles and im sorry i should have said those numbers are with it tuned. __________________ CAI and Ported TB,Loud Pedal Motorsports Tune, Pfadt Lowering Springs, and more.

03-10-2012, 07:51 AM	#10
SGOS252382 Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: S.W. Florida Posts: 6,294	You're good. You should be worried if you only made 290 rwhp. There have been L99 A6s producing numbers this low. I talked to a guy who said his L99 A6 only made 290 rwhp and he wanted to take his car back to the dealer. He ended up getting his car tuned by a local tuner, and his numbers jumped to the 330s range.

03-10-2012, 07:53 AM	#11
Slowhawk Drives: 1999 Trans Am Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Bridgewater,Ma Posts: 2,018	numbers look to be close. ussually the torque and hp is alot closer.

03-10-2012, 04:02 PM	#13
bmorecam Account Suspended Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM Posts: 3,658 View My Garage	Just because a guy make 290 on the dyno does not mean his car is really making 290hp LOL. You just have to understand how dynos work and what it was meant for. If you guys come out of a dyno with 360hp stock would you say that you need to take it back to the dealer? Some dynos will produce low numbers and some high, and some just about right. There's just no way to perfectly calculate your exact hp/tq on a dyno. It can come close but it will never be perfect on the money.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Lower Control Arm - GM Redesign Status?	tjd24	Suspension / Brakes / Chassis	8	11-07-2011 06:16 PM
TSP Cam + RPM Tune = Impressive numbers	lrc250	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	41	08-12-2011 01:46 PM
Stock Dyno Numbers	toast	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	2	01-05-2010 01:57 AM
5th gen performance numbers are in from the top	Scotsman	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	28	07-30-2008 05:38 PM