Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2012, 08:29 PM   #15
its a syn
B.O.D. 02/16/10
 
its a syn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SGM Sp. Edition 2017 RS Conver
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albia,Iowa
Posts: 3,959
Tracy, you sir are a class act! This makes this decision even harder to make. I have an 1/8 mile track just down the road from me so I am going to side with the torque numbers. That being said, I haven't shot the money to Mace yet and could be back on the black side when I make up my mind tonite
__________________
its a syn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 08:39 PM   #16
Preditorian
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmorecam View Post
I will tell you now...there was no way for me to run vararam the way it come with 25mm insulator. I had to modify the rear neck to an angle to make it work for the front gap to have enough room for air. I actually made the gap bigger too. It scared me a little since I didn't know if the angle was going to mess up the original airflow characteristic, but everything look good, from my fuel trims to ignition timing, perfect!

I can put up some pics or I can even meet up with you one day.. just let me know.
Please post screens with an explanation to changes via pictures so us simple folk can do the same.

I should have my VR tonight and am looking forward to the 25mm and VR. Thanks.
Preditorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 08:40 PM   #17
hapisok
crazier than a coconut
 
hapisok's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,547
this is what the forum is all about. i have a lot of respect for both tracy and steve and appreciate their hard work, tireless effort and dedication to responding to 1,000,001 PM's a day. without guys like them, we would still be talking about who has the best sounding exhaust or which CAI is numero uno. and thanks to the rest of the forum...yes, you! who make coming here and sharing ideas and good times part of my everyday routine. its like fat kids and cake, whitney houston and crack, macon and bacon...mmmm bacon.

thanks again to everyone
__________________
hapisok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 08:41 PM   #18
its a syn
B.O.D. 02/16/10
 
its a syn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SGM Sp. Edition 2017 RS Conver
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Albia,Iowa
Posts: 3,959
__________________
its a syn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 09:07 PM   #19
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Well at least now I can come out and say that I knew that at least one of you MACE folk were also doing testing for the RX units lol.

This is a great thread and pretty much confirms what I thought. I will say that I was thinking that the MACE might be the superior product because of its runner length, and it appears that it does pull a bit better down low, but good to see they both perform well in the upper ranges.

I would have had the MACE product, but the RX works perfectly with the VR and I was a bit scared to modify the VR intake. Still very happy with the black ice-olator.

Jay maybe you can shoot me a picture or two sometime of your modification to the VR tube...I'd like to see that lol.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 09:44 PM   #20
bmorecam
Account Suspended
 
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
Keith, predotarian, chad.. I got you

again, nice job aaron. This is what is all about. There's nothing better than a non biased straight up result. Both product get from me. for $150, this is what you call bang for the buck!
bmorecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:48 AM   #21
aron77
 
aron77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro LS
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: KC MO
Posts: 567
Well I was hoping you were going to say the black ice was hands down the better product cuz I just bought one and am waiting for it to arrive lol. I'm sure I'll love the ice but the mace is going to be the one that got away and I'll always wonder if I would have liked it better eventho they both sound good. Why do we have to make choices??? You always wonder what was behind door number two lol.
aron77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 04:59 AM   #22
Kmorpheus
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Green Dream Machine
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Waterloo, IA AUN
Posts: 296
I feel the Black Ice-Olator is the perfect fit for me, Really only drive my car on hot sunny days and the heat is a power killer.
Kmorpheus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 05:41 AM   #23
pistolgripcopo1
pistolgripcopo1
 
pistolgripcopo1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Carbon fiber gray
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Corona Ca.
Posts: 403
Good job
__________________
pistolgripcopo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 05:53 AM   #24
Blade


 
Blade's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS BVM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,689
Send a message via AIM to Blade
This is probably the best comparison test I have read since Janetty did the CAI tests early last year. This is how it should be done, thanks Hapi for taking the time and stepping up.

I have the Mace and pretty damn happy with it I chose it after reading about runner length differences and deciding that I want more torque that horses, I have plenty of horses already
__________________
Formerly owner of:

2012 2SS/RS Build Thread - Totaled by red light runner

2010 LT/RS Build Thread - Traded in for 2012 2SS

2007 Acura TSX

1992 Oldsmobile Achieva V6

1992 Mercury Sable
Blade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 09:07 AM   #25
Mike Norris
Account Suspended
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 592
Interesting test for sure. I would guess the mid-range gains are from the longer runner length. Plus it seems you have some quite extensive mods compared to what most folks are going to do to their cars.

What I would like to do is a test that more fits 90% of our customers from what I have seen. By that I mean is completely stock or minimal mods (VMax TB & CAI, No Tune, No Headers). This would be comparable to the testing I did for VMax and I think relate to a large portion of the buying market looking at these pieces.

Since Tracy was nice enough to send an ICE-olator out for free to test, maybe MACE would not mind sending one of the 25mm units out to me to test on a CAI/TB only car

If not, are there any US dealers for the MACE 25mm spacer kit? I would like to buy local (US) if at all possible.

Thanks!!

Mike Norris
Mike Norris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 09:18 AM   #26
Blade


 
Blade's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS BVM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,689
Send a message via AIM to Blade
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Norris View Post
Interesting test for sure. I would guess the mid-range gains are from the longer runner length. Plus it seems you have some quite extensive mods compared to what most folks are going to do to their cars.

What I would like to do is a test that more fits 90% of our customers from what I have seen. By that I mean is completely stock or minimal mods (VMax TB & CAI, No Tune, No Headers). This would be comparable to the testing I did for VMax and I think relate to a large portion of the buying market looking at these pieces.

Since Tracy was nice enough to send an ICE-olator out for free to test, maybe MACE would not mind sending one of the 25mm units out to me to test on a CAI/TB only car

If not, are there any US dealers for the MACE 25mm spacer kit? I would like to buy local (US) if at all possible.

Thanks!!

Mike Norris
I am sure if you PM Steve at Mace, he can provide one for you, or you can buy one off of him. He's been offering $150, ships to you within 10 days. I can attest to that
__________________
Formerly owner of:

2012 2SS/RS Build Thread - Totaled by red light runner

2010 LT/RS Build Thread - Traded in for 2012 2SS

2007 Acura TSX

1992 Oldsmobile Achieva V6

1992 Mercury Sable
Blade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 09:49 AM   #27
bmorecam
Account Suspended
 
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
I don't think it would matter weather the car is modded or not. If the test was done between two completely different modded cars than that would be inaccurate, but this test was done very fairly, non biased, on the same car, just two different spacers. To me the test clearly show that the ice win up top and mace win at the bottom which in theory it make perfect sense. Both winners in my book and I don't see the need for this to be dragged any longer.

Sent from my POS phone using tapatalk.
bmorecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 10:00 AM   #28
hapisok
crazier than a coconut
 
hapisok's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmorecam View Post
I don't think it would matter weather the car is modded or not. If the test was done between two completely different modded cars than that would be inaccurate, but this test was done very fairly, non biased, on the same car, just two different spacers. To me the test clearly show that the ice win up top and mace win at the bottom which in theory it make perfect sense. Both winners in my book and I don't see the need for this to be dragged any longer.

Sent from my POS phone using tapatalk.
+1...agree.

but hey, anybody that wants to continue comparison testing...go for it . the more data the better right? i wonder how drastic, if at all, the variation will be on a practically bone stock motor...

obviously heat soak of the air intake is an enemy to these motors. i think if they were the same thickness, then the results would have been nearly identical. but runner length has been proven over and over to change the dynamics of TQ/HP. increased runner length and isolation of the IM from engine heat is what creates the difference between these two...modded, heavily modded, or bone stock. and that is why i don't feel that the results will differ much in comparison. but then again, i've been wrong before. just my .02

Black Ice = higher HP up top

Mace = higher TQ low-mid range
__________________
hapisok is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2LT IOM, IO interior, black stripes, documenting my changes rtcat600man Member Car Journals 287 06-12-2018 06:25 PM
Cadillac Reveals Black Diamond Edition CTS-V FenwickHockey65 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 36 02-07-2011 11:21 AM
DSV/*********** Black Friday Blowout-Best Prices Of The Year 24 Hours Only!!!!! Indpowr Interior Parts & Accessories 23 11-27-2010 11:26 AM
HELPPP can i use the ICE Wax on flat black stripes Gavros 4 Life Cosmetic Maintenance: Washing, Waxing, Detailing, Bodywork, Protection 16 06-29-2010 08:30 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.