![]() |
|
|
#85 | |
|
juggernaut
|
Quote:
The tune they used was a race gas tune. even on their red car they have a race gas tune and a pump gas tune. so saying that obviously they feel. . . is probably wrong. We've got way too many people judging this car off of too few passes, and then keyboard racing. Sorry we don't have any definitive times one the 2013 gt500. we have press releases. which you all want to bitch about GM's claim on the ZL1, and take fords as fact? Sorry that's just BS. Why don't you all wait until the 13 gt500 is released and these actually line up next to each other? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Blessed
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,441
|
__________________
Click image to see build thread. PQ - "the love of cars. It's a boys first step toward manhood and a mans last hold on boyhood." Fbodfather - "We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name." The_Blur - "Let's not confuse competitors with equals." |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
They see me trollin'...
Drives: 217 ci of fury; Chauffeured by SS Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 13,875
|
Quote:
but once people learn the car, those times will go down, I'm sure of it. That seems like a LOT of mods to get into 10's to me. These cars need to be broken in before they'll really shine, I think!
__________________
"Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff." -CamaroSpike
2011 Custom LT/RS: Bella's Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
juggernaut
|
got a 12% drivetrain loss on previous manuals so 808.64 is what I got.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Fabricator
Drives: 2011 2SS Summit White Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Langdon, AB
Posts: 505
|
I think most in both camps are just a bit underwhelmed. I'm sure the GT500 will be slow at first, but it seems like they went to great lengths to try and make it easier to launch and drive. Much the same gearing as the ZR1 really, with much the same power, and a bit of extra weight.
The tires are not near as good, despite the Ford guy saying they are just as good as slicks. No shift for 60 takes quite a bit of driver skill variance out of the equation, as does the 1/4 in 3rd. With the GT500 back on the ring, hopefully GM sees the light.
__________________
Roto-fab CAI
Unobtainium Welding Exhaust ARH LT's 393whp L99 GPI VVT Turbo Cam-in |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Ashen Grey ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Whitehall, MI
Posts: 192
|
I have to agree that people are not giving the ZL1 enough time. These engines are not even broke in yet. The other problem I see is that the GT500 2013 model isn't even out yet. Who knows how it will actually do. I also question how great of a run they could have this early in the year. These runs where in Muncie? I assume they are talking Indiana and the weather up here is still not the greatest yet. Wait until we start getting some warmer days so the track warms up during the day and then the cool evening air comes in. From whaat I saw in the video they are hooking up too early so the R's are dropping. They need a little more slippage to keep the R's up or they need a lower gear in the rear. People need to remember that this car has a top end of 180mph. My opinion is that if this car was only for the strip the rear end gears need to be changed but then it isn't only for the strip is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 | |
![]() Drives: 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Granger , IN
Posts: 341
|
Quote:
As mentioned earlier, the MPH is there for a much better ET. 134 mph in 4100 lb+ car is pretty damned impressive. With that said, good luck to the LPE crew. Im sure better ET's will come in the state both cars are in right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
![]() ![]() Drives: '12 Camaro ZL1, '16 Silverado Z71 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Blaine, MN
Posts: 846
|
I think the mods list is the same as the 12.5 times. There is more than one way to get to the 10's. As time goes one, hopefully we'll see others with fewer/different mods breaking into the 10's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
![]() Drives: 2007 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 104
|
Just curious what a new SS camaro runs with the same mods? Heads, cam, exhaust, with no supercharger?? Should be around the same 1/4 mile times, right?
I don't believe the experience or more time needed excuse, most of these companies have worked on the Caddy with the same motor. Seriously dissappointed in the ZL1's over all performance, and modifications to make it go fast. I'm seriously glad I didn't wait to get one, felt like I dodged a 60k bullet to the head.
__________________
2015 Mustang GT "Cam only"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
|
The ZL1's aren't impressing me so far, sorry guys.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | |
|
Senior Camaro Fanatic
Drives: 2011 SS/RS manual - White Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: aiken, sc
Posts: 1,980
|
Quote:
Some info gleaned from the fast lists Normally aspirated LS3/L99 Camaro Fast List bolt-ons plus heads and/or cam, Stock Displacement 1. jhormilla - 10.837 @ 128.48 mph, (Heads/Cam, LT, Exhaust, CAI, PTB, UDP, Gears, 17" DRs), (LS3, M6) 2. Jon@Texas-Speed - 11.174 @ 121.42 mph, (Heads/Cam, LT, Exhaust, Converter, Tune, 17'' wheels, Slicks, (L99, A6) 3. CosmicBrut - 11.366 @ 121.64 mph, (Heads/Cam, LT, Ported TB & Intake, Converter, Tune, DRs), (L99, A6) 4. OrangeChevy - 11.37 @ 121.55 mph (Cam, LT, Exhaust, CAI, Tune, Skinny's, DRs), (LS3, M6) 5. Scottywheels - 11.390 @ 117.78 mph, (Heads/Cam, LT, Exhaust, CAI, Converter, Tune, DRs), (L99, A6) Normally aspirated LS3/L99 Camaro Fast List - bolt-ons only, no cams/head mods 1. 02pewtersix - 11.600 @ 119.17 mph, (LT, Exhaust, CAI, PTB, UDP, Tune, Skinnies, 17" DRs), (LS3, M6) 2. Walkermuffler - 11.71 @ 114.07 mph, (LT, CAI, Tune, 17'' wheels, Skinnies, DRs, (LS3, M6) 3. Number_9 - 11.78 @ 117.49 mph, (LT, CAI, Exhaust, T-stat, Gears, DRs), (L99, A6) Some select time from Power adders that appear to be stock LS3/L99 displacement 17. 94guy - 10.530 @ 131.52 mph, (Supercharger/Whipple, Cam, LT, Converter, DRs), (A6) 18. MattTuneTime - 10.58 @ 134.87 mph, (Supercharger/Procharger, Heads/Cam, LT, Exhaust, DRs), (L99, A6) 19. HufferSS - 10.58 @ 133.49 mph, (Supercharger/Whipple, Cam, LT, Slicks), (LS3, M6), (Corrected, DA +) 20. Camarovigoa - 10.626 @ 131.22 mph, (Supercharger/Whipple, LT, Exhaust, CAI, Converter, 17" Hoosiers), (L99, A6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 Mustang GT;2010 Challenger R/T Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
The new GT500 will solidly be in the 11's on street tires, knocking on 10's with big and littles if not there. Pulley and a tune ($700 worth of power upgrades) and I believe 10.7's or better will be very achievable. Still waiting to see a ZL1 at the track. Closest thing I have seen is CTS-V coupes running 13's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
![]() Drives: 97Z,02TA Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 174
|
11.00 and 130 mph is damned good considering it was just a tune, 13psi cai.
But it sounds like all you guys that live your life a quarter mile at a time are dissapointed though. If that's what your after theyrs prolly better cars out there though. But just keep in mind the drivetrain is very solid. An SS won't last long with the same abuse though. Personally Im more interested in racing this car on a roadcourse, that I'm positive it will do very very well. The ring and vir times speak for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|