Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2012, 05:05 PM   #15
MauriSSio
Banned
 
Drives: 1968 Ford Galaxie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffrcobra_65 View Post
Equal driver skills, a new Chally SRT8 will smoke both a 5.0 and SS...in a straight line that is.
it will beat it but i wouldnt say "smoke". They average maybe 2mph faster trap speeds than the 5.0. But i do agree that with equal drivers that comes out to a win for the chally.
MauriSSio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 05:38 PM   #16
WE485
 
WE485's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: AUSTIN, TX
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizard1183 View Post
GM has to put more HP in the motor to compete or beat. Isnt the mustang 440HP?
GM will not to do anything as long as long as they are selling more cars.
__________________

1996 Z28
04 GTO
2010 SS
2011 Avalanche
WE485 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 11:53 PM   #17
SS 376

 
SS 376's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minkman555 View Post
Uhm ,

Pretty much all 392's can hit 12.5 with a regular driver and 12.1 with a skilled shifter.

The SS will loose to the 392 every time with equal drivers. I know someone posted a 12.5 stock SS time but most stock SS'es with good drivers are in 13.0-13.3 range -- not constant 12.5's
Ok, I'm going by this: http://www.challengertalk.com/forums...-sticky-63213/ and this: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52264
SS 376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 09:30 AM   #18
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by SS 376 View Post
Not really. The 392 will do about a 12.4-12.8, about same as the SS stock and the 5.0. Remember, the 392 weighs about 4200 lbs which offsets its HP advantage. Moving to a 392 made the Challenger competitive performance-wise with the SS/5.0 but not really faster than either. It's just too bad the 392 is a $50,000 car OTD.
Lets think about that $50,000.00 price tag. If you shop as I have with options such as nav/sound/auto/wheels/and powered sunroof they can be had for $47,500.00. Now compare this to a fully loaded 2SS which still doesn't have the navigation and much less hp and tq is what $42,000.00 out the door? With the SRT you are getting a limited edition top of the line vehicle for not that more in price.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 10:15 AM   #19
Mr_Draco


 
Mr_Draco's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
Now compare this to a fully loaded 2SS which still doesn't have the navigation and much less hp and tq is what $42,000.00 out the door?

Where did you come up with this?

I bought my auto 2SS/RS with every option except sunroof and paid $38k out the door. When I bought it there wasn't any incentives so I paid MSRP.
Mr_Draco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 11:26 AM   #20
SS 376

 
SS 376's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
Lets think about that $50,000.00 price tag. If you shop as I have with options such as nav/sound/auto/wheels/and powered sunroof they can be had for $47,500.00.
Right, but then add sales tax and GG tax... Dont get me wrong--I like the 392 a lot, I just think it's quite a bit more expensive, and only a troll would say it somehow demolishes both the SS and 5.0.
SS 376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 11:41 AM   #21
cab2g
love. my. car.
 
cab2g's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,372
it's a nice looking car, but for the price, I'd rather mod my Camaro to be 500+HP at the crank and save the extra $$ for when I blow my motor or transmission The Challenger also has an encrypted ECU, so no performance mods for you!
__________________
cab2g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 12:58 PM   #22
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by cab2g View Post
it's a nice looking car, but for the price, I'd rather mod my Camaro to be 500+HP at the crank and save the extra $$ for when I blow my motor or transmission The Challenger also has an encrypted ECU, so no performance mods for you!
You are right 500 crank hp in the SS will cost you approx 7k in mods, delete your warranty and run high 11s to low 12s on average in the quarter. The auto equipped 392 stock will run the same numbers with only drag radials and keep it's entire powertrain warranty.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot

Last edited by newmoon; 05-04-2012 at 08:00 AM.
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 01:10 PM   #23
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
You are right 500 crank hp in the SS will cost you approx 7k in mods, delete your warranty and run high 11s to low 12s on average in the quarter. The auto equipped 392 will run the same numbers with only drag radials and keep it's entire powertrain warranty.
Yep, not to mention just the SRT STANDARD equipment that isn't available on a Camaro at any price. IE: Special SRT only seats, flat bottom/heated steering wheel, touch screen head unit with 30 or 40 gigs of storage, push button start, lightweight Alcoa rims, 3 mode (was 2 mode, mid year running change) Bilstien electronic suspension, 44-70 more HP, autos have actual shift paddles, the stripe package is standard and not optional, HID headlights ae standard, the hood scoops are functional, offers nav and harmon kardon (whatever it is called, same as lexus uses) audio sysem, the thing starts at 45k MSRP, but it seems a lot of people are getting them around 40k (both prices INCLUDING GG tax), 50k is for a fully loaded model, but again, you are getting a hell of a lot more than a loaded SS. The SRT slots between the SS/GT and ZL1/GT500 in both performance and price, seems totally a fair price to me once you look at all the facts.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 01:34 PM   #24
Rock36
I just like V8s
 
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Yep, not to mention just the SRT STANDARD equipment that isn't available on a Camaro at any price. IE: Special SRT only seats, flat bottom/heated steering wheel, touch screen head unit with 30 or 40 gigs of storage, push button start, lightweight Alcoa rims, 3 mode (was 2 mode, mid year running change) Bilstien electronic suspension, 44-70 more HP, autos have actual shift paddles, the stripe package is standard and not optional, HID headlights ae standard, the hood scoops are functional, offers nav and harmon kardon (whatever it is called, same as lexus uses) audio sysem, the thing starts at 45k MSRP, but it seems a lot of people are getting them around 40k (both prices INCLUDING GG tax), 50k is for a fully loaded model, but again, you are getting a hell of a lot more than a loaded SS. The SRT slots between the SS/GT and ZL1/GT500 in both performance and price, seems totally a fair price to me once you look at all the facts.
I think people miss that last part a lot. Car models dont always line up as nicely as we wold like sometimes.
Rock36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 05:44 PM   #25
MauriSSio
Banned
 
Drives: 1968 Ford Galaxie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Yep, not to mention just the SRT STANDARD equipment that isn't available on a Camaro at any price. IE: Special SRT only seats, flat bottom/heated steering wheel, touch screen head unit with 30 or 40 gigs of storage, push button start, lightweight Alcoa rims, 3 mode (was 2 mode, mid year running change) Bilstien electronic suspension, 44-70 more HP, autos have actual shift paddles, the stripe package is standard and not optional, HID headlights ae standard, the hood scoops are functional, offers nav and harmon kardon (whatever it is called, same as lexus uses) audio sysem, the thing starts at 45k MSRP, but it seems a lot of people are getting them around 40k (both prices INCLUDING GG tax), 50k is for a fully loaded model, but again, you are getting a hell of a lot more than a loaded SS. The SRT slots between the SS/GT and ZL1/GT500 in both performance and price, seems totally a fair price to me once you look at all the facts.
Didnt you know, standard (loaded) features are an awesome thing if youre talking about the ZL1. But if youre talking about the SRT8, standard (loaded) features are detrimental and not worth it. Same with the GT500 vs ZL1. Its somehow stupid that they (GT500) dont come with everything imagineable stock, but have options, but its a great thing when talking about the SS vs. SRT8
MauriSSio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2012, 08:45 PM   #26
Blue Menace
 
Drives: 2013 WRX Sedan
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by MauriSSio View Post
Didnt you know, standard (loaded) features are an awesome thing if youre talking about the ZL1. But if youre talking about the SRT8, standard (loaded) features are detrimental and not worth it. Same with the GT500 vs ZL1. Its somehow stupid that they (GT500) dont come with everything imagineable stock, but have options, but its a great thing when talking about the SS vs. SRT8
I'm not sure I follow your logic. The worth of any particular option is highly subjective. Also, I'm confused by you seemingly saying standard is the same as loaded.
Blue Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2012, 03:29 AM   #27
MauriSSio
Banned
 
Drives: 1968 Ford Galaxie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Menace View Post
I'm not sure I follow your logic. The worth of any particular option is highly subjective. Also, I'm confused by you seemingly saying standard is the same as loaded.
its easy to confuse the simple minded. I just meant that the ZL1 comes with things people might not want standard whereas with the GT500 it is an option (track pack). People here love that the ZL1 is available as such without the option of not having things like a couple of coolers. The SRT8 on the other hand gets trashed on these boards for having things standard that are not available on the SS and making people pay for it (just like the ZL1). I hope i made myself clear. If not, it wont bother me none.
MauriSSio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2012, 03:38 AM   #28
y2k king

 
y2k king's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 ss camaro
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: spring hill, fl
Posts: 1,705
srt would've been my second choice.
__________________
10/28/2010 got it
y2k king is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.