![]() |
|
|
#253 |
![]() Drives: mustangs Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: va
Posts: 87
|
As much as I love the ZL1 I have to say that I don't think that 11.90s is anything special for it. Taking a brand new car and putting some tires on it and running 11s is impressive but I still think these cars are capable of going much quicker. I still say that when real drag racers get there hands on them and the cars have some miles on them we will see much faster times from stock cars with tires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#254 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2006 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 522
|
Quote:
It was run with an experienced driver. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
I just like V8s
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
|
If that is the case, it might also explain those awesome 60' times on a street tire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#256 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: One of the baddest handling Gen 5s Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Masachusetts
Posts: 4,177
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2006 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#258 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2012 mustanng gt, 1968 chevy camaro Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: home
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
the 013 gt500 finally moved up to 6 piston brembos, so it should be interesting is he still feels the same. he seems to keep his opinions somewhat un-biased too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,221
|
1.6 on stock tires is hard to believe. I'll ask someone I know who will give me accurate info. Won't name him in the thread but he won't lie.
Either way cool car.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
Hey PSJ....will be interested to know what you find out. It's good to have some reason filter into this mostly RIDICULOUS thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#261 |
|
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,221
|
My guy is saying that both cars went 11.9's on stock tires. They did try DR's but never got good runs on them track was too green. I believe him 100%.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
|
|
|
|
|
#262 |
|
Banned
Drives: 10 GT500, Raptor Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Center, CO
Posts: 107
|
My question is, Hennessey and Livernois (Redline didn't release a stock tire time)both went 12.4x-12.5x on stock rubber then bolted on DR's and dropped to 12.1x. How is it that these guys only went .1 faster?
Are these guys on the GM payroll or are they an independent testing source? Why not release what the DR times were? |
|
|
|
|
|
#263 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Vette Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 572
|
Tks for the info, PSJ. 1.69 on stock rubber....very interesting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#264 |
![]() Drives: 2012 ZL1, 00016 Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Whitesville, NY
Posts: 265
|
Thanks, of course with most of these mustang guys they will find something negative about every good post about this car even if they see it in person. I kinda get sick of it. They are both great cars and let's give credit where it is due instead of bashing every single video/post that people put on here. There was a guy that ran a 12.04 on stock rubber/manual with a car that had 250 miles on it. Video taped it from inside the car and showed slips. Of course this was smoke and mirrors as well becasue he didn't tape it from the tree and get the time board in the video. Just wears on some us I think. They are both great cars. Just give credit when it is due. JMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#265 | |
|
Anthrax Popcorn User
Drives: 2013 GT500 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
I'm not sure I can do it here. You're saying that if this super technical awesome track car in the ZL1, beats the GT500, with it's tiny 285 tires, archaeic suspension, that already handled like hell with 550 hp then it's a fail for the GT500? I know there are hundreds of opinions but this one just might have become my favorite C5 thought. Then you go further stating about how the ZL1 has nothing to lose. A car that had been touted as "beyond the pony car league" that would defeat the 2013GT500 in every single performance metric, and that the chief engineer put on such a lofty cloud, is somehow an underdog. I guess it's just the way I interpreted the post, but you've created yourself an out for every possible combination of performance comparisons that will come out. I'll post my own just for the record. New GT500 thumps the ZL1 on the drag strip, and very likely whoops it around VIR as well. If I'm wrong, please remember to call me out and I'll apologize/retract my comments. PS: I had a baby yesterday! Figured I'd throw that out there. Babies>ZL1s and GT500s together. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#266 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 4 Wheels, Gasoline Engine Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,007
|
Quote:
There are a lot of experienced drag racers on this site, so I ask the question. Have you or anyone you know ever had a sub-1.7 60ft time on any factory equipped radial tire? My take is that GM ran that 11.93 on the Goodyears, but the time slip with that 60ft time was one of the many runs they made on the drag radials. I understand the excitement, as GM is offering a factory Camaro that can hit 11's right from the factory. Ford guys had the same level of enthusiasm back in 2010 when Evan Smith hit high 11's on stock rubber in a 2010 GT500. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|