![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That looks pretty damn redneck lol.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro L99 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie PA
Posts: 1,226
|
Well he had the car raised up in the rear and retuned. Not sure what is going on this week yet. I really want to see it run at Thompsons!! Did not get a Dyno sheet so I have no idea if its still the 438 rwhp. The tuner said he changed some things and thats all he said. I really hate the Tuner talk it drives me insane!!! He got a Aliment sheet, first I seen one of them. My Sister had to drive the car b/c he lost his privilege for 6 months from medical. She had to pull over b/c the car kept kicking out on the highway in the rain with them tires. I do not drive, oh well. Sucks for me. I would never be able to sit in that car with my helmet on anyways, I'm a big, big guy.
__________________
2010 L99
vararam intake, Vmax TB,Vmax Intake,TSP VVT 3 Cam,TSP underdrive pulley,Yank 3600,TM Cooler,ARH 2", High Flow cats, X-pipe, GM Pro mufflers, RX Catch Can,160 stat, BMR Trailing,toe,Cradle insert, Diff. Bushings, End links, Spohn-LCA's (Touring)Wheel spacer's. 422 rwhp Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaFNAhCL7Os |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Drives: CAMARO 1SS 2011 Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: AU
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
I ran 12.8@112.3 with 2.39 60'...whichs pretty losing launch. But I ran on stock convertor and wheel/tires... Will fit jre 2800 and 18" and try later. ![]() My goal is 12 dead or 12.1 I would be happy.High 11 require a port head from what I read the 1/4 top lists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro L99 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie PA
Posts: 1,226
|
He is hopping for 11's with his set up. I think at the Ohio track it can be done. He can not drive it at the track either. His friend will. Are track is just to darn slick. The 1 reason he got the 2" headers was for the extra Drag racing HP and he went with the Ported Vmax intake over the heads b/c was cheaper. Gains on the intake I have no clue what he is getting. I seen on Camaro 5 some high numbers throw around and low to no HP increase. Was told that the VVT-3 cam loves the air and the Intake works threw the whole RPM range. I just hope they got his car tuned right now. People could not believe they let the car go with the tune the way it was. I'm Leary bought them now. Seams every place he went something is not right. When the headers went on and the new Jannetty tune the stock convertor would lock and unlock and lock and the car went slower. Then when he had it Dyno tuned with HP tuners it dropped over a sec from Jannettys tune. Everyone says how great there car is after a Jannetty tune and all but was not the case with my Dads car. I tried to get him to fix it but Ted said it was fine and he tuned so many of them. Sent him the data logs and he sent that tune back. I talked to another Person on Camaro 5 that had problems with his Jannety Tune and was told it was fine as well, Not saying who it was as I told the guy I never would. That is the only other person I know of.
__________________
2010 L99
vararam intake, Vmax TB,Vmax Intake,TSP VVT 3 Cam,TSP underdrive pulley,Yank 3600,TM Cooler,ARH 2", High Flow cats, X-pipe, GM Pro mufflers, RX Catch Can,160 stat, BMR Trailing,toe,Cradle insert, Diff. Bushings, End links, Spohn-LCA's (Touring)Wheel spacer's. 422 rwhp Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaFNAhCL7Os |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|