Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2009, 09:50 PM   #85
Z_Rocks

 
Z_Rocks's Avatar
 
Drives: everyone crazy...
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,109
90 Degree bend

As I was watching the video, I noticed this add-on creates a 90 degree bend while the car is running in factory mode, which creates lots of back pressure, especially if you're running S/C in stealth mode. Here is where I'm talking about:
Z_Rocks is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 09:51 PM   #86
Justcallme61
 
Drives: 2000 honda accord v6
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 214
HEY, I'm from Sioux Falls! Nice to see something productive coming from this small town/state. This must be the one that was spotted here earlier this week. Too bad I didn't see it while it was here :(

Btw, sounds amazing.

Last edited by Justcallme61; 05-18-2009 at 10:04 PM.
Justcallme61 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:07 PM   #87
rxweelo
 
Drives: RX-7s Bel-air
Join Date: May 2009
Location: tea SD
Posts: 5
The AFR was rich to start with and we didnt get any reading from the diverters when they where open, but I would susspect it was fine. I know this thing could have made more power if we had a tunner too. Keep in mind the HP and Trq where actuall improvemnt numbers even though the base number was lower than some numbers Ive seen on here. We are using a superflow dyno.
rxweelo is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:15 PM   #88
69 Camaro 09
 
69 Camaro 09's Avatar
 
Drives: 69 Camaro, 010 2SSRS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 311
performance wise, why have cut-outs vs an axle-back or cat-back system (borla, sts, etc..)

this is not a smart-ass question or anything, if there is a big difference, i really am just uneducated
69 Camaro 09 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:17 PM   #89
MerF
Go Rays!
 
MerF's Avatar
 
Drives: 03 Trailblazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Pete, Florida
Posts: 2,532
Stock sound when desired, more performance from the cut-outs because there's nothing after them like a cat-back would have.
MerF is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:19 PM   #90
69 Camaro 09
 
69 Camaro 09's Avatar
 
Drives: 69 Camaro, 010 2SSRS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 311
and i assume since the install is easy and there is less piping, it is cheaper?

why do anything else then?
69 Camaro 09 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:30 PM   #91
ZeeTwentyFour
Does not have a Camaro
 
ZeeTwentyFour's Avatar
 
Drives: 99 silverado Z71/66 Chevelle SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 469
Send a message via AIM to ZeeTwentyFour
Was this test with stock exhaust manifolds or headers?
__________________
ZeeTwentyFour is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:35 PM   #92
pharmd
Master of Medicine
 
pharmd's Avatar
 
Drives: 4th Gen
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 784
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69 Camaro 09 View Post
and i assume since the install is easy and there is less piping, it is cheaper?

why do anything else then?
To each their own, but to me Diverters > all....stock + tuned sound + "BEAST" sound...you have all 3 in one system...and in "BEAST" mode you make 18rwhp and 27rwtq...I honestly don't see any catback making that...that would net you "AT LEAST a tenth in the 1/4"...and the system is a top quality looking piece...now throw a cam in it and it will be straight NASTY!
__________________
2002 Camaro SS. 408 LS2. 500+RWHP/480RWTQ. Full UMI RR suspension. Koni/Strano. 295F/315R. 3500#(55/45)
pharmd is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:38 PM   #93
now
 
Drives: silverado ss
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: fairfax sd
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by pharmd View Post
Did you guys happen to get any other video's from different angles, take off's, drive by's, standing rev's...I love the setup and totally agree with this type of deal on a stock exhaust...you have the best of both worlds for sure...our wives will love us for it (no gas smell and you can turn the noise off).

We do have some other videos but it was so damn windy that afternoon and the audio was garbage so unfortunately the best is on the balcony out of the wind of from outside and the fans.


Quote:
performance wise, why have cut-outs vs an axle-back or cat-back system (borla, sts, etc..)

this is not a smart-ass question or anything, if there is a big difference, i really am just uneducated

This style of system allows a total factory sound and performance yet giving you the hp and trq numbers comperable to a full cat back or axle back system when you want it. Compare it to a killer stereo system- we all love it loud but there is a volume knob for a reason.

Quote:
Very cool setup. Are there any prices?! The only gripe I would have is that the motors for the diverter valve are placed in a place that could leave it suseptable to damage from speed bumps, rocks, etc....

Prices are online at our store and the actuators are actually higher than the pipes themselves - only by 1/4" or so but they are higher so a speed bump is going to hit your exhaust system before it hits the actuators. This is actually the lowest point of the entire exhaust system the cats turn down to this S pipe and the h pipe is way above it too. This however happens to be the only place for our product and it fit perfectly.


Quote:
As I was watching the video, I noticed this add-on creates a 90 degree bend while the car is running in factory mode, which creates lots of back pressure, especially if you're running S/C in stealth mode. Here is where I'm talking about:
We will have to check with rxweelo but i think the car actually likes a little bit of back pressure and the numbers went up slightly when we bolted it in. It definately didn't go backwards in either trq or hp.


Thanks for all the questions- We will try to stay on top of them.
now is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:44 PM   #94
now
 
Drives: silverado ss
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: fairfax sd
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeTwentyFour View Post
Was this test with stock exhaust manifolds or headers?
100 percent stock.
now is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:44 PM   #95
Milk 1027
Camaro➎ moderator
 
Milk 1027's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 BLK 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,567
One question from me.

Will this still work well with an aftermarket exhaust system?
__________________
Milk 1027 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:45 PM   #96
ZeeTwentyFour
Does not have a Camaro
 
ZeeTwentyFour's Avatar
 
Drives: 99 silverado Z71/66 Chevelle SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 469
Send a message via AIM to ZeeTwentyFour
Quote:
Originally Posted by noweeds.net View Post
100 percent stock.
I cant wait to see what they do combined with headers. Awesome product!
__________________
ZeeTwentyFour is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:46 PM   #97
Mindz
E.B.A.H.
 
Mindz's Avatar
 
Drives: you wild...
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In the happy padded room wearing a jacket that makes me hug myself...
Posts: 18,420
Man, that is a sweet set up. Excuse my ignorance, but the diverter basically is electronic cut outs?

Keep up the good work!
__________________
Blue Rush, 2010 SS [Car of the Week 3/22/2010] Traded in on...ZLZBUBB, 2013 ZL1
Mindz is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:48 PM   #98
Z_Rocks

 
Z_Rocks's Avatar
 
Drives: everyone crazy...
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by noweeds.net View Post
We will have to check with rxweelo but i think the car actually likes a little bit of back pressure and the numbers went up slightly when we bolted it in. It definately didn't go backwards in either trq or hp.
It would have been very useful it there were three dyno runs:
First, with stock exhaust
Second, with your cutout, but valve closed. This would certainly show if the 90 degree bend is helping or loosing power.
Third, with the Valve open. This would give us a nice picture how HP and TQ would be in each stage.

I agree in N/A the bend would help, but the Cutout is even more helpful in F/I, but my concern is that sudden bend in F/I.

The cutout sounds 100 times better on a V8 than V6 or I4. Is this the final design?
Z_Rocks is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Tags
cutout, diverter, electric, exhaust, mufflers


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 08:05 PM
Edmunds: 2010 Ford Mustang First Look Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 32 11-23-2008 10:55 PM
Automobilemag.com: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Q&A Scotsman 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 23 10-12-2008 01:13 AM
Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 AirGoya Chevy Camaro vs... 86 07-24-2008 12:20 PM
Camaro (concept) Press Release!! Pencil.Fight 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 4 07-21-2008 04:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.