Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2012, 05:40 PM   #113
bmwdon
I refuse to go smurfy
 
bmwdon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger SRT8, 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 1,311
I envy your small....oh wait....nevermind
__________________

-Bill...the Camaro was my wifes, now she's got a minivan
Challenger- 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 Procharger D1 Supercharger: 10.895 @ 126.720 MPH
bmwdon is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 01:29 AM   #114
derklug

 
derklug's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Boss 302
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, Mi
Posts: 1,369
Kitchens in Indiana and Arklahoma are missing a couple of appliances.




Hey, if the head of F1 racing can say it, why can't I?
__________________
The biggest mistakes in life come when you know exactly what you are doing.
derklug is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 03:02 AM   #115
Swampmonster
 
Drives: Black 2011 camaro 2ss
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southaven ms
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by angie7 View Post
Well lucky for you I am out bc Im done with this pointless thread. Ive already proven my point and E.T. on page 2 posted a motortrend article abou the srt8 CHARGER which is what I was referring to not a 392 Challenger or Jeep that folks brought up on their own. The SRT8 CHARGER numbers are extremely close to a SS Camaro. Im glad that you guys want to keep shouting off about how the SS would get spanked by a Charger, go buy one then. The numbers and links are more accurate then your opinion. And thats fine if you dont want to learn and educate yourself on the topic, thats not my issue.

Just enjoy your car and I will mine no matter what kind it is. That was the point of this thread before the drama club started in

here I added it for you
dont listen to these people...they are going off numbers and stats...maybe if they got out there and actually put their money with there mouth is they would realize that between the ss and srt8, its a drivers race. i beat one at the track the other day not once or twice, but 4 times...both are manual. yes the challenger has more hp but it dont mean anything once you start putting all that to the tire and the torque differences and etc. now as far as a ram beating an ss..idk about that, i havent seen or heard of that happening. and im not here to dog dodge, my first vehicle was a dodge ram and i loved it, im not just a chevy fan but a cars fan in all
Swampmonster is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 03:22 AM   #116
SixGracing

 
SixGracing's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 A6
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Haven, UT
Posts: 790
Challenger, Chargers, Mustangs, I can beat them all.

Last run 11.7 @ 118 1/4 mile. And my car is stock.. Ok, I'm lying a little.. (about the stock part)
__________________
SixGracing is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 04:27 AM   #117
SVTGOD
Account Suspended
 
Drives: cobra
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: de
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by angie7 View Post
Yea sorry had hip surgery cant drive a stick anymore and again...who cares Im not racing, I didnt buy it to race. If I wanted to race and challenge everyone I wouldve bought a GT500. I knew this this would go away from the intent I posted it Im laughing at the insecure folks who always wanna race. Thats all. Nvrmind.
Gt500 are definately for hardcore racers
SVTGOD is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 04:38 AM   #118
SVTGOD
Account Suspended
 
Drives: cobra
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: de
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixGracing View Post
Challenger, Chargers, Mustangs, I can beat them all.

Last run 11.7 @ 118 1/4 mile. And my car is stock.. Ok, I'm lying a little.. (about the stock part)
NO, you can beat all of them except mine. I will mop this entire site with your camaro....

392 challengers are the most over rated cars since the muscle car era.
I mean, 470hp and weighs like a pig(4170lbs), come on mopar. In this era of pony wars, that 392 challenger belongs in the early 1970s.
Anyways, mopar will always be the bastard child of muscle cars in this era.
SVTGOD is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 06:50 AM   #119
bmwdon
I refuse to go smurfy
 
bmwdon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Challenger SRT8, 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 1,311
we suck? :(
__________________

-Bill...the Camaro was my wifes, now she's got a minivan
Challenger- 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 Procharger D1 Supercharger: 10.895 @ 126.720 MPH
bmwdon is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 07:57 AM   #120
SixGracing

 
SixGracing's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 A6
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Haven, UT
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTGOD View Post
NO, you can beat all of them except mine. I will mop this entire site with your camaro....

392 challengers are the most over rated cars since the muscle car era.
I mean, 470hp and weighs like a pig(4170lbs), come on mopar. In this era of pony wars, that 392 challenger belongs in the early 1970s.
Anyways, mopar will always be the bastard child of muscle cars in this era.
You will do the mopping? Figures since janitors don't make enough money to afford a Gen 5 Camaro.

You could probably pick up an older generation Mustang Cobra for cheap. Oh wait, looks like you already did..
__________________
SixGracing is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:11 AM   #121
880
 
880's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Z06, 2004 Cobra, 1991 MR2Turbo
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixGracing View Post
You will do the mopping? Figures since janitors don't make enough money to afford a Gen 5 Camaro.

You could probably pick up an older generation Mustang Cobra for cheap. Oh wait, looks like you already did..
huh?
__________________
880 is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:18 AM   #122
SixGracing

 
SixGracing's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 A6
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Haven, UT
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by 880 View Post
huh?
I'd explain, but it would be futile..
__________________
SixGracing is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:40 AM   #123
DRKS1D3


 
DRKS1D3's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Corvette Grand Sport M7
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
lol, you realize the only real difference between a automatic 392 Challenger, that runs as quick as 12.2 with a good driver, and an SRT8 392 Charger is around 100 pounds of weight right? Same engine, transmission, gearing, suspension, etc, etc........
No kidding brain. I posted on here because somehow all these people started talking about her racing a Challenger 392. It wasn't the stats, it was the model of car that mattered...
DRKS1D3 is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:52 AM   #124
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTGOD View Post
NO, you can beat all of them except mine. I will mop this entire site with your camaro....

392 challengers are the most over rated cars since the muscle car era.
I mean, 470hp and weighs like a pig(4170lbs), come on mopar. In this era of pony wars, that 392 challenger belongs in the early 1970s.
Anyways, mopar will always be the bastard child of muscle cars in this era.
Yes, an NA car which can run low 12s, has MODERN features like an adjustable bilstien suspension (ala GT500, oops For guy), A FULLY INDEPENDANT SUSPENSION (yes an 03-04 Cobra does, but not as modern as the Challenger Suspension and the GT500 NOW is not running one), fully modern features, ABS, Stability control, etc, etc. Yes, so Overrated......
Stew is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:53 AM   #125
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRKS1D3 View Post
No kidding brain. I posted on here because somehow all these people started talking about her racing a Challenger 392. It wasn't the stats, it was the model of car that mattered...
Ok, i got ya, it's all gravy
Stew is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 12:42 PM   #126
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTGOD View Post
NO, you can beat all of them except mine. I will mop this entire site with your camaro....

392 challengers are the most over rated cars since the muscle car era.
I mean, 470hp and weighs like a pig(4170lbs), come on mopar. In this era of pony wars, that 392 challenger belongs in the early 1970s.
Anyways, mopar will always be the bastard child of muscle cars in this era.
Funny you say that as my stock 392 would have outrun my pullied 04 Cobra on street tires, that's not saying much for the Cobra.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline  
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.