![]() |
|
|
#365 |
|
eolson
Drives: 2006 premium Package Mustang GT cou Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 249
|
There's no way the GT500 can make up for the fact it is not as refined as the ZL1, or that the GT500 doesn't drive as easily fast, nor does it have a nice feeling over bumpy roads, that is a fact.
The GT500 does match the ZL1 on the road course track times. Fact... Erik
__________________
2006 Prem Pkg Mustang GT coupe. Saleen SC,10psi, 454rwhp,442rwtq, Complete Steeda/H&R, suspension change out, with weight loss, Techco Watts link, Stoptech big brakes, Race clutch, Alum. flywheel, Alum 1 pc driveshaft, 9x18,10x18 chrome bullit wheels, 285/40/18,255/45/18 nitto 555 tires. 3545 lbs currently. New car scent air freshener.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#366 | ||
![]() Drives: 08 CTS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Quote:
Tighter (Gingerman) or rough-surface tracks favor the ZL1. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#367 | |
![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 ordered Join Date: May 2012
Location: retired
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
base 55,250 bright wheels 470 nav 795 gg tax 1,300 total 57,815 The suede seat inserts and mytouch are standard. They do have a suede option for the shifter and steering wheel but personally I don't like it. I wear gloves at the track anyway. This is about $5k less than your car. But my car will be tracked occasionally. About 1-2 times per month, except winter. So the track pack would definitely be needed. That's another 3k to add in. And we still have to mod and experiment to get rid of the brake fade. And no, just changing brake fluid will not be enough. These cars are too heavy and powerful. You need airflow to keep them cool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#368 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: tangent or
Posts: 2,985
|
Quote:
exposed carbon is $600, sued was either $450 or $500. for me price was idendial base vs base. If had got no options it would have been 55k vs 55k. this is why I chuckle when people say money does not factor in. I could ahve got x-plan on the shelby I proabably would have bought it. I was pissed my order got pushed out. there is no way I would not mod the base shelby suspension though in the long run. so this was my dilema. If you have the money though the shelby has many options. I hate the glass roof, will never speend $2400 on nav, the recaro's I am 50/50 on like them on the track not may favorite for daily. this is where bias comes in handy. Because I love the accelartion of the shelby but i also love the suspention package on the ZL1. if you can affoard it the TP/PP could be the car for you but at the same time the ZL1 with an extra 100hp might just be the best of both worlds. more comfortable, laps faster, accerates as good etc. past generation shelbys have lost there balace with big HP bumps this genration might not though.
__________________
2016 2SS
2020 super duty on 37's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#369 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '12 Camaro ZL1 #1255 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 1,279
|
I must give credit to the Shelby that thing pulls the Z every straight except for one and is going 5-10mph faster most of the time. Amazing but I find it fantastic that the Z in every of corner is either tied or winning. That's the suspension and brakes working its magic and reeling in the Shelby.
Both very impressive cars. In my eyes pitting these 2 cars against each other on a track both road courses and drag is a drivers race.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#370 | |
![]() Drives: 08 CTS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
But that's his opinion of how he "felt" the two cars behaved on the course. My 2 cents... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#371 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Dream Cars in my head Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 808
Posts: 1,290
|
Quote:
__________________
Wishful thinking...but I sure can dream big. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#372 | |
![]() Drives: 08 CTS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#373 |
![]() Drives: 2012 ZL1 IOM Manual Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northville, Michigan
Posts: 85
|
I knew it all along, Camaro is best overall. Wait until I put the 700HP upgrade on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#374 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#375 | |
![]() Drives: 03 Cobra Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 508
|
Quote:
__________________
2003 Cobra (Stock Motor/Boost Only)
640rwhp/ 550rwtq on 93... Well over 700rwhp on CORN ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#376 |
![]() Drives: 1974 Z-28 Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 26
|
If you read the article by the third lap it hasnt even caught the GT500 yet. The GT500 had just slowed down enough that it was only running with the best time of the ZL. What kind of skewed lodgic is it that a car running faster for 2 laps, then vertually the same on the third are even at tha point and getting passed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#377 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sin City
Posts: 697
|
The article listed the GT500's 3rd lap time but listed only the ZL1's first lap time. It says the ZL1 did slow down a little bit each of the 2nd and 3rd lap but didn't list the final lap time. Draw your own conclusion. Either way, both win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#378 | |
![]() Drives: 08 CTS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Last edited by PistonsFan; 06-28-2012 at 07:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|