Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2012, 08:18 AM   #127
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUKXOST View Post
okay okay.....I think I MEANT more of a traditional aftermarket coned filter for performance. Not saying this drop in version isnt getting good #'s, I'd just love to see a comparo
That would be pointless as it would just be another one of those type boxes.

Look a the dirt pattern on a filter from one of those Cone-N-the-Box intakes and you'll see where the majority of the air flows through.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 08:42 AM   #128
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
Isn't the VR filter a oval shapped filter as well? I know they were at one time but they may have changed.
VR has had a flat filter for as long as I've been running one.

The oval filter is just a flat filter folded up to fit in a limited place

Seriously though, I'm not sure if you know how much time Jason has spent testing and tweaking to bring a different option that is a true performer, because he felt there had to be something better. On this subject I totally get where he is coming from.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 08:50 AM   #129
DRKS1D3


 
DRKS1D3's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Corvette Grand Sport M7
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,748
Another great thread started by the OP in regards to intake performance. RacnJsn's R&D and thorough explanations of his hypotheses should make decisions a lot easier for most folks on which product they intend to utilize on their car. Great job, the product looks terrific!
__________________
MY RIDE: 2017 CORVETTE GRAND SPORT--TRIPLE BLACK, 7 SPEED MANUAL, VARARAM TCR-7 INTAKE, BORLA CATLESS X-PIPE, CARBON FIBER STAGE 2 AERO, MGW SHORT-THROW SHIFTER

**SOLD**2011 TRIPLE BLACK SS CONVERTIBLE--6 SPEED MANUAL, MANY MODS, 455 RWHP/435 RWTQ


DAD'S RIDE: 2012 ZL1 #1866--BLACK, 6 SPEED MANUAL, EXPOSED CF HOOD, POLISHED WHEELS, SUNROOF, ROTO-FAB INTAKE

"Silly Americans, taking from the rich and giving to the poor only works in fairy tales. Success is earned here!".
DRKS1D3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 10:06 AM   #130
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
1) If you build the OEM location CAI RIGHT, it doesn't matter what shape your filter is, as long as it's free flowing. 2) I know the Halltech has a HUGE velocity stack encorporated onto the end of the pipe. Their filter has a spike that directs the air to the intake mouth but it's smoothed by the velocity stack as it enters the tube. I'm thinking the CAI brand has something similar but not as pronounced as the Halltech. The reason why the Camaro OTR's don't utilize a cone isn't because a flat panel is better, but because you can't physically fit one in the space provided. Halltech uses a oval filter in their Corvette intakes and they are known to work extremely well. 3) Isn't the VR filter a oval shapped filter as well? I know they were at one time but they may have changed.

3) I won't go into the "ram air affect" since it's a marketing gimmic and seems that any obstruction in the path of the air will nullify any affect you could possibly see.

4)I do like the look and construction of your intake though.
1) You are correct, but why not make one that's even more free flowing than the next? This is what I was trying to achieve, and according to my flow testing of the other intakes I have had, I have achieved that (so far).

2) Cone filters with the inverted cone (spike) end are superior in flow to a cone filter with just a flat closed off end from what we've found. We use S&B filters with the inverted cone end on a lot of the go-kart stuff we do here. They pick up power every time according to our DynoJet 168. Of the tube & cone style inakes I have flow tested, the Halltech flows the absolute best (of the tube & cone filters that I have tried, I have not tried them all, nor to I plan to. I just acquired the most popular brands for testing).

3) The OTR Camaro VR unit uses a flat filter.

4) Thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
VR has had a flat filter for as long as I've been running one.

The oval filter is just a flat filter folded up to fit in a limited place

Seriously though, I'm not sure if you know how much time Jason has spent testing and tweaking to bring a different option that is a true performer, because he felt there had to be something better. On this subject I totally get where he is coming from.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DRKS1D3 View Post
Another great thread started by the OP in regards to intake performance. RacnJsn's R&D and thorough explanations of his hypotheses should make decisions a lot easier for most folks on which product they intend to utilize on their car. Great job, the product looks terrific!
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 11:39 AM   #131
Bo White


 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Summit White 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vance Alabama
Posts: 8,094
I dont see an issue with the hood up on this test, both the OEM and JacFab intakes are enclosed anyway.
__________________
Retired wanna be cylinder head porter
2015 2SS 1LE Clutch reservoir, Vararam DRX, ported TB, TSP 2" headers, MGW shifter, stage 4 cam and Wilkes 11° 65cc heads
Totalled:
2010 1SS Wilkes Performance/Eagle 416 shortblock, TSP custom valvetrain, PRC 260 heads, Edelbrock Pro Flo 102, th400 swap, 8" PTC 5500 stall= 535/435 at the wheels tuned Gen 3 Performance and Dyno 10.97 @ 124 full weight in 3100 DA CamaroFest X
Bo White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 12:39 PM   #132
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanBoles View Post
If you need a test mule for a humid southern climate im down (in MS)! Just throwing the dog a bone!
We have confirmed intependent testing lined up to take place in Missouri (dyno), Texas (SOTP, and driving impressions confirmed, have not talked about dyno), and we will be sending one to Lethal Racing to dyno on one of their Night Fury cam installs to see what the intakes max. potential would be on a modded out cammed car.

Once that testing is completed, and we get the intakes back that have been discussed to come back, they may be sent out to different locations for further testing/impressions.

Last edited by Jason@JacFab; 09-17-2012 at 12:56 PM.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 12:54 PM   #133
hapisok
crazier than a coconut
 
hapisok's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacnJsn95 View Post
We have confirmed intependent testing lined up to take place in Missouri (dyno), Texas (SOTP, and driving impressions confirmed, have not talked about dyno), and we will be sending one to Lethal Racing to dyno on one of their Night Fury cam installs to see what the intakes max. potential would be on a modded out cammed car.

Once that testing is completed, and we get the intakes back that has been discussed to come back, they may be sent out to different locations for further testing/impressions.
thats what i call true independent testing. well done sir!
__________________
hapisok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 01:22 PM   #134
pnyklr

 
Drives: A Gift From My Wife
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 1,557
Good stuff for sure.

Any ball park on when this might be available to the general public?

-Funk
__________________
2012 Convert 2SS/RS SW/IO LS3 - Build #1081

07/21/2011 - (3800) Order produced and vehicle is being prepared for shipping.
08/09/2011 - (4200) Shipped (vehicle is shipped to the dealer or interim point of delivery).
08/16/2011 - (5000) Vehicle has been delivered to dealer.
08/19/2011 - In my possession.
pnyklr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 01:31 PM   #135
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnyklr View Post
Good stuff for sure.

Any ball park on when this might be available to the general public?

-Funk
It's probably going to be at least a couple of months before they start going out the door slowly.

I'd like to wait until I get some of the independent testing dyno results, and impressions before I start sending them out the door, and put what I deem to be a final portential hp/tq gain to it... I'm very interested to see the dyno results from the Missouri testing with a scoop and the washer bottle relocated, and the Lethal Racing results.

The "Name That Intake!" contest will start shortly after I hear back from the testing, which I'll probably let run for 1-2 weeks, then start producing the production lids with the intake name on them. The winner of this contest will receive a *FREE* intake in their choice of black or silver powdercoat finish.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 02:07 PM   #136
RyanBoles
 
RyanBoles's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 132
Quote:
We have confirmed intependent testing lined up to take place in Missouri (dyno), Texas (SOTP, and driving impressions confirmed, have not talked about dyno), and we will be sending one to Lethal Racing to dyno on one of their Night Fury cam installs to see what the intakes max. potential would be on a modded out cammed car.

Once that testing is completed, and we get the intakes back that have been discussed to come back, they may be sent out to different locations for further testing/impressions.
Theres no DYNO local to me but I will be gald to do a SOTP and general effectiveness, the weather here is always humid and so far since Isac came through its rained every other day just about, thanks again!
RyanBoles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 03:40 PM   #137
ssmike
BL1ZZRD
 
ssmike's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Camaro 2SS, '20 Equinox Redline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 7,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacnJsn95 View Post
It's probably going to be at least a couple of months before they start going out the door slowly.

I'd like to wait until I get some of the independent testing dyno results, and impressions before I start sending them out the door, and put what I deem to be a final portential hp/tq gain to it... I'm very interested to see the dyno results from the Missouri testing with a scoop and the washer bottle relocated, and the Lethal Racing results.

The "Name That Intake!" contest will start shortly after I hear back from the testing, which I'll probably let run for 1-2 weeks, then start producing the production lids with the intake name on them. The winner of this contest will receive a *FREE* intake in their choice of black or silver powdercoat finish.
I"d like to start the contest early, how about "JacFab" cai. lol! I win already! I'll take a black one please sir!
ssmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 03:59 PM   #138
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
I suggested "Put that cone up your...", but was told it was too wordy.
Yeah, I don't know about that one... Pretty tough to fit all that on the lid.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 04:00 PM   #139
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacnJsn95 View Post
Yeah, I don't know about that one... Pretty tough to fit all that on the lid.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2012, 10:18 PM   #140
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Higgs Boson View Post
You may or may not know this but Jason has purchased and "flowed" most of the popular intakes out there. He knows exactly how much CFM they can move.....Different filter shapes, tubes, etc etc.

If I still had my SS, this is the intake I would get.
I'm well aware of his test. My point was, if your engine flows X cfm and you have a panel filter that flows 10X cfm, then a cone that flowed 6X cfm, which one is going to produce better HP results? Both are flowing WELL over what the engine could use. Basically, at what point does the filter stop being the restriction? Somewhere along the line you have to start looking at design and not just at filter flow numbers.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
cai, dyno, intake, jacfab, velocity


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.