![]() |
|
|
#43 | ||
![]() Drives: Cadillac on four flats Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boondocks
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
My Yellow Jacket was 47k and some change, I paid 41k. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
you get less for your money going with a challenger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 RS - 2013 2SS/RS - 1971 RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
MSRP is 44K (with Track Pack) not much more than the 2 SS at 41and change (invoice) and not with all the options. My SRT came home cheaper than what I can get a 2SS for (41 and change) and it came from the factory with Nav, illuminated cup holders, 3 season performance tires, track experience and driving school, one year of satellite radio with nav and traffic, active three mode suspension, dual disc clutch, keyless entry and start, and a higher safety rating. Yes the car is heavier than the camaro at 4158 (mine with a full tank of gas) but the camaro weighs in at 3750 (per my manual) and that only equates to a .12 HP to weight ratio which I seriously doubt you can feel and that is with proven fact the Mopar is putting down over 445 to the rear wheels. So come on tell us again those of us who own both which is the better deal. I enjoy both my Camaro and Challenger and have several Mopars and Chevrolets and it comes down to taste and those still racing or competing, and not in parking lots on towny night, know why they buy either brand. It is not about oh the V6 is in a heavy car well yeah but that V6 is rated at 305 HP not so much less than the LFX and PS the V8 5.7L has 400 LB FT of torque behinds its 375 HP which is only 20 LB FT of torque less than the 2SS to get it rolling off the line. HP means nothing unless you can get it rolling as quickly as you need it. OK this old timers rant is over sorry did not mean to go on and on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 RS - 2013 2SS/RS - 1971 RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Good price for the Yellow Jacket - I was going to go that route until I saw mine setting there blacked out by the dealer and just had to have it. The dealer I bought mine from in Greenville SC even loaded my HDD drive on my radio for me with my MP3s I mailed to him on USB keys. Have you noticed QNX allows you to not customize the background on the Camaro but will on the Mygig? Wonder why GM did that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
and i will bet that 5.0L(maybe) or BOSS would be faster than all. overall do you see my point ? challenger is honestly a little behind the other pony cars. not to mention handling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 678
|
My original post was not about the SRT, its about the RT. I was making the comparison to the my SS. Granted my SS is fully optioned, so I am a bit more privileged but even discounting the interiors I didn't like how the Challenger drove and handled especially the sloppy gateless shifter and the electric throttle lag was BAD and took a lot of thrill out of the ride. Maybe the SRT drives better, but I wouldn't know.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS, Hurst Short Throw, IdealG M/C, Pypes Pipe Bomb, LSR Cold Air Intake, LSR Toe Links/Lower Control Arms Clear Image headers, high flows, Slowhawk tune
1974 Chevy K10 Built 355, FAST EZ EFI, 5speed 2000 Chevy Tahoe LT 5.3L, Slowhawk tune |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 RS - 2013 2SS/RS - 1971 RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Hint Hint the SRT is the SS Competition not the R/T. R/T = GM or Ford do not fill this niche', while I understand the confusion this is not meant to be the competition for the SS, sort of like saying the 1LE should be compared to the Corvette ZR1 when it is in the Grand Sport class. SXT = Camaro RS, Ford Mustang V6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
![]() Drives: camaro jeep srt8 2010 gtr Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: spfld
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
You can purchase a brand new Camaro SS (1SS) for MSRP ($32,635). That's about $10K less than the base model SRT Challenger. The Challenger R/T and Camaro SS are very close in price and are definately direct competition. Your statement "It's like saying the 1LE ($37K) should be compared to a ZR1 ($140k car)"? is ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
![]() Drives: 2015 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
__________________
2015 Camaro 2SS Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE Last edited by 07-SRT; 01-18-2013 at 08:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 RS - 2013 2SS/RS - 1971 RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Is it? Just like comparing a stripped SS price against a loaded SRT isn't ![]() ![]() An SS "comparably" equipped is more in the price range of the SRT the RS V6 is more likely to sale in the range you quoted for the SS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 RS - 2013 2SS/RS - 1971 RS Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,027
|
Chevrolet - you should know suggested MSRP for a 2SS starts at 37 and a 1SS at 33, which is nowhere near what a "base" SRT 8 is so quit trying to compare. If you build a 2LT/RS which is about what a SXT Redline is the Camaro is actually higher than even the R/T packaged with MORE features than the Camaro in even the lower of the trims. Only upgrades since you guys want to cry the SRT8 price listed is a base SRT8 are block heaters and radio upgrades - oooops forgot I can change the tires for a buck fifty. SS 1LE Package is 3500 (feature already on SRT8 has 3 mode suspension standard) and who is playing catch up Mike I forget? RS Package is 1350 (Already on SRT and everything above SXT Rallye) Automatic Trans if you so desire is 1185 Stripe depending upon your taste if you desire 450 for Rally 275 for Hockey (standard on SRT8) Carpeted Floor Mats 155 (standard on SXT Plus and above) If you want cup lighting like the Challenger already has it will cost you 555 from Chevrolet. Pretty gas cap cover is also standard on the SRT8 how much is that from Chevrolet? (not a fan myself on the Camaro but since we are comparing apples to apples) Just Built 2LT and added RS Package with 20s only no auto no nothing 31,900 go check it MikeSS ROTFL while thinking who would get in the floor with all the pissing going on in this thread? What I find funny is how you lil tykes continue to argue a point that is readily verifiable out on any performance page or on the manufacturers websites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|