Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2013, 06:01 PM   #29
Oldag
 
Drives: 2013 2SS Convertible, LS3
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toasty View Post


if the drainback valve doesnt work as designed, that lets the oil drain back though the filter into the pan. Less oil in the block=less oil prime for the next start up...which can make the engine turn over a bit harder due to lack of lubrication. Nobody ever said it would not start.

Sorry, but I would defy anyone to back this up with real data. The residual oil will be enough to ensure a start. We are talking thin film. Obviously, continued operation is a different story.
Oldag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 07:01 PM   #30
Jeffm
ICANHAZ
 
Jeffm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 CRT 1SS/RS
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Skiatook, Ok
Posts: 983
I have been using Fram in my cars most all of my driving life. My Dad did same before me never had an issue in all that time.
Jeffm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 10:56 PM   #31
Toasty
Custom User Title :D
 
Toasty's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Summit White 2LT/RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 2,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldag View Post

Sorry, but I would defy anyone to back this up with real data. The residual oil will be enough to ensure a start. We are talking thin film. Obviously, continued operation is a different story.

Again. Nobody ever said it the engine wouldn't start. But it's a pretty simple concept. More oil in the block/heads at startup means that there is a better chance of a quieter "smoother" startup, due to the presence of the oil-both in the fact that it would be more than a 'thin film' and also that it does not have to travel up from from the pan to circulate though the engine.
__________________
Toasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 12:35 AM   #32
The Sandman
Flying Low & Raining 3's
 
The Sandman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS 45th Ann. Edition
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 149
.

Last edited by The Sandman; 04-25-2013 at 01:23 AM.
The Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 09:43 AM   #33
Russell James


 
Russell James's Avatar
 
Drives: '15 SS 1LE, '69 Z28 drag car
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mich
Posts: 4,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulletman View Post
The standard Fram filter has cardboard endcaps. Felt and fiber are not cardboard. Advance Auto has sectioned filters on display. Cardboard has no business being in an oil filter.

Pic of an ACDelco PF48 guts. Metal end caps. Anti drainback valve. Spring loaded pressure relief valve. High quality media. No felt end caps here, mr Fram was spreading some bad info earlier in the thread. The PF 48 is not made by Fram.

A PF48 is the perfect filter for LS engines. Works perfect and is the only filter covered by the factory warranty. Have a problem with any other brand filter and you're on your own. When I was a tech, never once saw a problem with an ACDelco filter. Saw tons of problems with the cheaper aftermarket stuff, especially Frams and Purolators... they are garbage.

... and a bad drain back valve can cause starting issues. Most noticeable will be the lifter knock. But can also cause hard starting or rough running briefly as some of the lifters may be collapsed... some valves not hardly opening much.


Russell James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 12:44 PM   #34
Blau camaro
Account Suspended
 
Blau camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: #1 CAMARO FAN
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Rockford IL.
Posts: 656
To all that used fram oil filters back in the day and never had a problem, I say that todays engines are a whole different ball game. Also using oils like castrol GTX, yesterdays oil for yesterdays engines.
Today we ( at least I) use Mobil 1 5W40 year round. So far so good, and only OEM filters.
Blau camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 05:54 PM   #35
Oldag
 
Drives: 2013 2SS Convertible, LS3
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 361
Interesting, RJ.

The only oil filter I have ever had trouble with was the one time I could not find a Fram and had to buy an AC. Haven't bought another AC since.

Maybe a freak occurrence, but figured it was not worth the risk.
Oldag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 05:55 PM   #36
Oldag
 
Drives: 2013 2SS Convertible, LS3
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blau camaro View Post
To all that used fram oil filters back in the day and never had a problem, I say that todays engines are a whole different ball game. Also using oils like castrol GTX, yesterdays oil for yesterdays engines.
Today we ( at least I) use Mobil 1 5W40 year round. So far so good, and only OEM filters.
Castrol GTX has been doing a great job in today's engines for me. But then I don't try to push oil changes out to 5000 - 10000 miles.
Oldag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 08:07 PM   #37
JohnnyBfromPeoria

 
JohnnyBfromPeoria's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 LS M6, Black
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,045
If automobile manufacturers really wanted to cut down on wear, every car would have a tank that pressurizes when the engine is running, filled with a quart or two of oil. The tank would hold that pressure after the car is shut off. As you restarted the car, the oil would be released before the starter engages and there would be no more dry starts, resulting in tons less wear. Of course it's not all that simple, for instance, you wouldn't want the delay if you stalled your car in traffic, etc.

Smokey Yunich wrote the above idea in a column in a magazine I read back in the 70's about how cars could easily be made to get over a million miles on the engines and get better gas mileage. Three guesses why manufacturers don't do it, and the first two don't count.

John B.
__________________
12 LS M6, IPF S/C, ASA GT-5 wheels, VMax PTB
1995 Mitsubishi Montero SR
1987 Dodge Raider Turbo Project
1986 Mitsubishi Montero 2.4l FI Transplant
JohnnyBfromPeoria is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.