![]() |
|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 LS M6, Black Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,045
|
Well then, somebody start developing a gear set! Then we'd really have a reason to complain about underhood noise.
John B.
__________________
1995 Mitsubishi Montero SR 1987 Dodge Raider Turbo Project 1986 Mitsubishi Montero 2.4l FI Transplant |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
Im just spreading the word about the differences in DI and regular fuel injection. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Blown Cool Breeze
Drives: 2011 Black on Black 2SS M6 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pinehurst NC
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
I am going to stick up for Mobil 1 though,there is no valid reason to "skip" it's use in DI engines,especially since it holds the #3 spot in independent laboratory testing as the OP shared in post #1. I also believe the new LT1 will be factory filled with Mobil 1,someone correct me if I'm wrong...of course the timing chain is short Again,I believe GM needs to manufacture a more robust chain for these OHC engines.
__________________
Had a 2010 IBM 2SS M6 Enjoy life.Think of all the women on the Titanic who passed up dessert. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Like I said, and others as well, check out the UOAs. I know that the one guy here has a had a few good ones but if you drive the car hard, IMHO, I'd skip over the M1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 LS M6, Black Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,045
|
Look at my sig. I do not baby my car.
John B.
__________________
1995 Mitsubishi Montero SR 1987 Dodge Raider Turbo Project 1986 Mitsubishi Montero 2.4l FI Transplant |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|