10 camaro ss 6m vs 95 gt 5.0 cammed - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

430606 · 08-20-2013, 12:52 PM

I got a 2010 Camaro ss 6m cai borla exhaust short throw shifter got a cocky neighbor saying his 95 mustang gt 5.0 that's got a cam intake injectors tune exhaust ect. He says he can take me at a 1/8 and 1/4 mile track what yall think

Posted from Camaro5.com App for Android

NYYFan325 · 08-20-2013, 01:01 PM

No... just no. Those 95 GT's did mid 14s or so stock. He would need to knock over a second off is 1/4 and those mods just aren't doing it.

Unless he has much more then you just listed, should be all you from start to finish

Juiced1 · 08-20-2013, 01:10 PM

94-95 5.0s were dogs. If it's a true 5.0 with just a cam and bolt ons I think you should walk him. If I remember correctly they came with 225HP and they aren't fox body light.

Deki · 08-20-2013, 01:25 PM

Yeah, he's not anywhere near the power levels that he needs to beat you. Unless he's on tires and you screw up the launch, he doesn't stand a chance.

Irnwkrkev · 08-21-2013, 03:37 AM

If he's taken weight out of the car and worked the heads it's definitely possible. Even though they weigh less then a fox body they're still WAY lighter then 3,800lbs.

People forget about how 25 years ago you could take a lx fox body with a factory 225 hp, and for a few buck do a 12 second tune up! Under 3,000 lbs had it's advantages.

They also forget about Ronnie Crawford's strawberry lx running low 9's with a carbed 302 stroker on N20.

shiznight · 08-21-2013, 05:57 AM

if he has, lets say trickflow upper and lower manifolds, twisted wedge heads and cam, 4.10's, a decent radial and sub frame connectors and lca's i'd be concerned, but i doubt he has those kinds of pockets if he is just flaunting a cam and exhaust. probably just an e303 cam and some headers with no cats.

in my opinion you have it in the bag if you manage to get off the line in under a 2.2 60ft. but i'm only speaking from personal expirience

2012 Mustang GT · 08-26-2013, 12:19 AM

All comes down to the mods...the computers in those cars SUCK. so if hes on the factory 94-95 ECU he will be limited somewhat. Alot of people goto 89-93 ECU or just go the FAST route. his car weighs alot less than you. And stock the engine was rated at 215. If the mods you listed are correct, a modded V6 will run that

08-20-2013, 12:52 PM	#1
430606 Drives: 2010 camaro ss iom 6m Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: nelson Posts: 64 View My Garage	10 camaro ss 6m vs 95 gt 5.0 cammed I got a 2010 Camaro ss 6m cai borla exhaust short throw shifter got a cocky neighbor saying his 95 mustang gt 5.0 that's got a cam intake injectors tune exhaust ect. He says he can take me at a 1/8 and 1/4 mile track what yall think Posted from Camaro5.com App for Android

08-20-2013, 01:01 PM	#2
NYYFan325 Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 508	No... just no. Those 95 GT's did mid 14s or so stock. He would need to knock over a second off is 1/4 and those mods just aren't doing it. Unless he has much more then you just listed, should be all you from start to finish __________________

08-20-2013, 01:25 PM	#4
Deki Drives: 2018 Mustang GT Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 1,764 View My Garage	Yeah, he's not anywhere near the power levels that he needs to beat you. Unless he's on tires and you screw up the launch, he doesn't stand a chance. __________________ 2018 Mustang GT

08-21-2013, 05:57 AM	#6
shiznight Drives: 2010 camaro ss l99 Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: oklahoma city Posts: 224	if he has, lets say trickflow upper and lower manifolds, twisted wedge heads and cam, 4.10's, a decent radial and sub frame connectors and lca's i'd be concerned, but i doubt he has those kinds of pockets if he is just flaunting a cam and exhaust. probably just an e303 cam and some headers with no cats. in my opinion you have it in the bag if you manage to get off the line in under a 2.2 60ft. but i'm only speaking from personal expirience __________________ TSP vvt-1 cam, Headers-catless xpipe, Knn intake 417/422 Nitrous 100 wet shot 520/585 Racestar super 94 17x4.5/17x9.5 highest trap to date 120.6mph 12.0@spinfest. rage

08-20-2013, 01:10 PM	#3
Juiced1 Account Suspended Drives: 2012 2SS CAMARO 45th Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: St. Charles, IL Posts: 18,663	94-95 5.0s were dogs. If it's a true 5.0 with just a cam and bolt ons I think you should walk him. If I remember correctly they came with 225HP and they aren't fox body light.

08-21-2013, 03:37 AM	#5
Irnwkrkev Drives: 2011 SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Miami Posts: 528	If he's taken weight out of the car and worked the heads it's definitely possible. Even though they weigh less then a fox body they're still WAY lighter then 3,800lbs. People forget about how 25 years ago you could take a lx fox body with a factory 225 hp, and for a few buck do a 12 second tune up! Under 3,000 lbs had it's advantages. They also forget about Ronnie Crawford's strawberry lx running low 9's with a carbed 302 stroker on N20.

08-26-2013, 12:19 AM	#7
2012 Mustang GT Drives: 2012 Mustang GT, 1998 Cobra Join Date: May 2012 Location: VA Posts: 278	All comes down to the mods...the computers in those cars SUCK. so if hes on the factory 94-95 ECU he will be limited somewhat. Alot of people goto 89-93 ECU or just go the FAST route. his car weighs alot less than you. And stock the engine was rated at 215. If the mods you listed are correct, a modded V6 will run that