![]() |
|
|
#183 | |
![]() Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#184 |
![]() Drives: Black and +600hp Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: St Louis, Missouri
Posts: 11
|
|
|
|
|
|
#185 |
|
A GM nut-swinger!
Drives: A Car Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 262
|
It said 2008 CTS-V...No such thing, 07 had the LS2 and the 09 had the LSA. I allways wanted a fast 4-door.
__________________
2004 GTO Quicksilver
2009 G8 Liquid Red 2005 CTS-V Black Raven |
|
|
|
|
#186 |
![]() |
07-09 and 2010 gt500 still look better than the camaro. in my opinion. But keep in mind there is also nostalgic to many people buying the new one.
__________________
2013 BOSS 302 LS
|
|
|
|
|
#187 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 754
|
You do know pushrods are ancient too right? and so is IRS...
|
|
|
|
|
#188 |
|
Resident Expert
Drives: Supercharged 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 581
|
If I was a GT500 owner, I would be embarrassed by this thread.
First of all, please re-watch the video... it states the GT500 beat the Camaro by one tenth of a second (12.8 vs 12.9). Are you kidding me? 540 HP vs 426 HP and it only beat it by one tenth of a second! This is proof that GM is superior to Ford. I showed this video to my buddy who owns a GT500 and he started to cry. LMAO!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#189 | ||
![]() Drives: 2005 SilveradoSS AWD Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orange County -CA
Posts: 426
|
Quote:
well if i swapped pullies... if i had better tires... if that shelby driver didnt suck...
__________________
Sales Forcasting 101A:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#190 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 862
|
Quote:
How about you show your friend the 12.3 times done by journalists?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#191 | |
|
Resident Expert
Drives: Supercharged 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 581
|
DeathChill...
Quote:
On paper, the GT500 should smoke the Camaro SS, but it didn't. It was one tenth of a second faster... embarrassing to say the least.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#192 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 862
|
|
|
|
|
|
#193 | |
|
Resident Expert
Drives: Supercharged 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 581
|
Quote:
In the real world a stock 2010 Camaro SS will beat a stock Mustang GT ten times out of ten.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
Repeat after me....
Drives: 1969 Chevy Camaro Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 50
|
Regardless of all the bickering within this thread, which is a guarenteed to happen given the comparison, it's not really a justified comparison.
They tested the Camaro SS against the Mustang GT. On the product lineup they are equal. Just as the V6 Camaro is the same as the V6 Mustang. That made the Mustang guys cry that the Camaro, equal on the product lineup, was much faster. So they had to bring out the heavily moddified Mustang GT500 out to please the Mustang boys. They were mad about them comparing the 315 HP Mustang GT to the superior 426 HP Camaro; "Not Fair!" they screamed. But it's ok to take a 540 HP Mustang to beat on a lesser HP Camaro. Is that kind of logic standard equipment on those cars? On a side note, I find it rather funny that the Mustang GT only has 11 more horsepower than the V6 Camaro. I don't care if the Mustang GT500 was a full second faster. I would still never buy it. In my opinion the Camaro wins in style factor hands down. And in the end, for a car I will drive all the time on the street, that is more important. 75% of the people buying GT500's will likely never "legally" use the extra horsepower they have over the SS anyway. So what is the point in saying, "This magazine says mine is faster than yours!" Big freakin' deal.
__________________
- Jason
Death smiles at us all. All a man can do is smile back. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#195 | |
![]() Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
The changeable winds made comparing times over the course of the day a challenge, but the constant was we were always driving into a headwind. The first journo to go got into the Grabber Blue car and pulled out a 12.33 -- faster than Ford's officially listed time. Asked to back it up an hour later he did a 12.5. Some drivers were getting their 60-foot times under two seconds. A photographer who had never been on a drag strip before did a 12.8 on his third run. http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/07/f...re-do-we-sign/ .
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#196 |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
I promise I'm not biased, despite the fact that I drive a Mustang myself.
The 2010 GT500 should have beaten the SS by almost a full second. The driver probably does suck. That being said, it's not really fair to compare a GT500 to a SS. The upcoming (hopefully) Z/28 definitely, but not to a SS. Thanks to the price/power gap, the real comparison is between the SS and the GT, which the Camaro wins by a narrow margin in most of the comparison tests. The big shootout I'm waiting for is the SS against the new 302. That's going to be awesome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do you want the Z28? | ChrisB | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 1616 | 09-05-2010 12:49 AM |
| My review of the SS (vs Vette, Challenger, Mustang) | vetteman | Chevy Camaro vs... | 45 | 08-03-2009 01:53 PM |
| Tags 2002 Camaro SS FOR SALE (SOLD!) | TAG UR IT | Autos For Sale / Wanted | 40 | 06-23-2009 02:11 AM |
| 2010 GT500 Update (Not an AFD gag). | garagelogic | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 9 | 04-02-2009 01:21 PM |
| Camaro SS vs GT500 not KR | chewy4ce | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 99 | 01-29-2009 11:30 PM |