![]() |
![]() |
#393 |
![]() Drives: Chevy colorado Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 2
|
2011 camaro convertible , convertible ,convertible
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#394 | |
![]() Drives: Infiniti G37S, Suzuki B-King Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#395 |
![]() Drives: The Larkvillemobile Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver Suburbs
Posts: 188
|
Gold. Mustang got it right with sunset gold metallic:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#396 |
![]() Drives: 2006 EVO MR - 390 @ wheels Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 384
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#397 |
![]() |
What I would like to see:
- Rear View Camera - HUD (w/ nav integrated) - Cooled Seats - Auto Climate Control - T-Tops (this will help dominate the pony car market because no other car has these or anything similar, imagine the marketing in bringing this back!) - Ambient Lighting (to be featured everywhere like it was supposed to and allow color change like the Mustang so people aren't forced to have either blue or orange when they choose a specific interior color and so it is integrated to the floor lighting, side sills, dash gauges, etc) - Integrated Antenna - Parking Brake (change the position and/or the style of it, I am not fond of where it is positioned and it should be shorter and have leather to look classier and less out of the way, looks cheap and quickly put together IMO) - Additional Interior Colors (Red maybe?) - Functional Fog lights! (IDK why GM made it the DayTime Running Lights and not operational at the same time ![]() - Hide Away Lights Option (just like in the old days ![]() - Iroc Option? - Raised Hood and More Differentiation (now I had an issue with this because this is what should signify a V6 from a V8, the V8 should only have the raised hood and not just a mail slot to tell the difference, when people buy a V8 they want people to know they have it and it isn't a V6 IMO, when I see them from far away from behind they look very identical and can barely tell the difference in the front, there should be a little more differentiation with the different engine models) - More Wheel Options (different styles since they all look very similar with the 5 spokes) - Smart Key, Push Start, & Integrated Door Handles (my STS has this feature and I love it! It is very convienent and a big help when in a rush and the push start is very futuristic! Along with the smart key there should be integrated door handles like the Vette and XLR, it looks classier and less fingerprints lol) - Painted GFX from factory (I mean come on? ![]() - Functional Ram Air Hood - LED Tailights and Integrated Reverse Lights (this may help bring more appeal to the back of the Camaro, I am not too fond of it but it still looks good, however it can look better IMO with these features) This is pretty much what I am looking forward too and I hope some of these come true because I am going to wait for the 2011 model to see some of the updates and maybe consider a Z28! Joe
__________________
Last edited by JJSoCrazy; 08-01-2009 at 02:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#398 |
![]() Drives: Camaro 2SS IBM/Grand Prix Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 123
|
Let's see here...trying to stay realistic (yeah, we could all ask for a 600 hp engine, convertible, etc but for a one yr refresh I want to stay within the realm of possibility)...some of these were mentioned before but these to me are glaring omissions that shouldn't add too much to the price...some inspired by my brother's otherwise inferior ;-) Challenger R/T:
1) More color choices 2) Hill climb assist (yeah, if you are good with stick you shouldn't need it. but this was my first MT car in a while, and I admit I was nervous driving the first few times on a steep hill, esp. when someone pulled right up on my ass almost to the bumper) 3) Keyless entry/ignition (how nice would it be to never have to fish for the keys out of your pocket and just grab the door to open it, and push a button to start) 4) Climate control...you don't know how much you miss it until its gone. I hate fiddling with fan speed/temperature dials to get the right temp. Set it at 75 and let the computer do what it needs to do. My Grand Prix has this, why can't the Camaro? 5) No skip shift 'feature' on the MT (I know, probably not going to happen) 6) Removable roof panel ala Corvette 7) Bigger trunk opening (can't it somehow, some way be accomplished? I know this isn't meant to be an SUV but the trunk on the Challenger is a lot more reasonable to deal with. They don't even need to make the actual trunk bigger and add weight...just give us realistic access to the one we have! Plus this would be needed to add #6 above) That's really all the obvious stuff I have the comes to mind, and I don't think it is asking too much. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#399 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#400 |
![]() Drives: 1976 camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: bakersfield
Posts: 472
|
yea, i know you guys wont do this
but a wild 302 that loves to rev underrated so the mustang guys wont feel left out say put it at 290 horse again ratted at like 4400 but it revs to like 7000 with 450 horse up there (with todays standards i know it wont happen) or a factory installed cam or something Last edited by 76z28; 08-01-2009 at 05:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#401 | |
![]() Drives: 2001 Toyota Corolla S Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chula Vista
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
yes the car should lose weight, but decreasing HP isn't going to help it "kill any mustang..." the 2011 mustang is going to have a 5L M6 with over 400HP/TQ at approximately the same weight as the current body style. the current mustangs are close in 0-60 and 1/4 because they are lighter and therefore have a similar HP:mass ratio. it'll also be getting even better gas mileage. i know motortrend is all into the whole lower displacement with boost, but that's not what the american muscle car is. and wtf is the turbo 4 banger going in a camaro. the camaro is a MUSCLE car, not a ricer. keep the turbo 4 in the cobalt to deal with the civics. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#402 |
![]() Drives: 08 GMC Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 92
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#403 | |
Paul
|
Quote:
![]() Makes me wonder if I am doing the wrong thing buying now, if I hold out for the 2011... I could keep my FJ... UGH! WEll I'll just get what I have now, then get a z28 in 2012, unless that's slated for 2011... I just hope all the cool stuff in the 2011 that's going to blow our minds can be retro fitted?
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#404 |
![]() Drives: 03 Toyota Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sierra Vista,Az
Posts: 5
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#405 |
![]() Drives: The Larkvillemobile Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Denver Suburbs
Posts: 188
|
My point is if why does Ford have the swatch closest to Bumblebee's color and we don't, you know?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#406 |
Elderly Man
Drives: Your Local Bus Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California
Posts: 214
|
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Camaro Exterior and Interior Stainless Steel Trim Parts from RPI Designs! | RPI Designs | Exterior Parts & Accessories | 30 | 02-20-2013 03:23 PM |
SEMA Camaro: Yellow Camaro Concept | Tran | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 45 | 09-01-2011 02:19 PM |
Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 | Number 3 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 31 | 04-17-2011 03:24 PM |
GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 07:33 PM |
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on | dieseldave24v | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 13 | 02-23-2009 06:56 PM |