Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2014, 08:29 PM   #29
trw427ss

 
trw427ss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Denham Springs La.
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueforce View Post
Do you see anyone else in the world using HP as a guage of power? Nope. They always mention torque. All HP does is keep you going a little longer after you pull your foot off the gas and increase your max top speed. It isn't a true measurement of performance. Who wants or can go over 130 anyways? Where I live there's not even roads of thruways long enough to achieve that and that's fast enough anyways. Acceleration is what makes a car fun, not how you can go 150mph.

First of all Horsepower is a derivative of torque and Horsepower is what accelerates the vehicle! I don't think you know what this car is used for or how fast it is. Lol I drag race it not top speed race it! This car runs 100mph in the 1/8 mile (660' ft) and almost 127mph in the 1/4 mile! If that's not Acceleration and fun I don't know what is! Horsepower is the only true measure of performance in acceleration!
__________________
2013 2SS/RS L99/A6 Crystal Red Metallic Tincoat 12.76@108.98mph Bone Stock
12.46@111.19mph with New Era CAI & U/D Pulley
12.12 @ 114.16 after Stainless Power headers and no tune yet on stock P-Zero's!
12.007@ 115.20 With 18" Drag Radials - 11.93 @115.19 Added a PTB 11.76 @116.59 With Yank SS3200 Converter - 11.63 @116.52 After PI and Tuning 11.44 @118.75 New Best
10.72 @127.93 after heads and Cam and Yank SS3600
trw427ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 08:40 PM   #30
DaemonGPF
Redonkulous
 
DaemonGPF's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 306
Sounds like a boring place. Maybe a move away from Buffalo is in order.

...and Top Gear (the U.K. one) references horsepower all the time. That counts as at least 1 more than "nobody".
DaemonGPF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 12:45 AM   #31
Blueforce
 
Blueforce's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buffalo, NY, United States
Posts: 161
Just an FYI, HP is not what accelerates you. Torque does. Acceleration is measured in meters per second per second or ms^2. Just like gravity is 9.82 ms^2. We measure it in ft-lbs of torque. Acceleration is the change in velocity which is not measured in HP. Either way, if you have a 200 HP 600ft-lb torque car vs a 500 HP 500 ft-lb car the 500hp car would lose the race. Assuming same vehicle same weight and same drag and all that. And yes as an engineer I know that 1hp = 746 watts. Europe measures their cars in watts usually. The reason top gear mentions HP a lot is because it has a huge american fan base.

And its not a boring place. All I care about is getting the car to accelerate to 100 mph as fast as possible. I could care less about going much faster. I've hit 140 numerous times and that's enough for me. I just want to be put into the seat and a high speed doesn't do that but getting to a high speed does.

And yes thanks for linking that article. HP is stated as just a measure of output of how much the motor makes. Nothing to do with its acceleration. And how fast it goes 0-60. Maybe go to school and take a few physics classes to learn stuff.

Last edited by Blueforce; 03-29-2014 at 12:58 AM.
Blueforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 03:02 AM   #32
trw427ss

 
trw427ss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Denham Springs La.
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueforce View Post
Just an FYI, HP is not what accelerates you. Torque does. Acceleration is measured in meters per second per second or ms^2. Just like gravity is 9.82 ms^2. We measure it in ft-lbs of torque. is the change in velocity which is not measured in HP. Either way, if you have a 200 HP 600ft-lb torque car vs a 500 HP 500 ft-lb car the 500hp car would lose the race. Assuming same vehicle same weight and same drag and all that. And yes as an engineer I know that 1hp = 746 watts. Europe measures their cars in watts usually. The reason top gear mentions HP a lot is because it has a huge american fan base.

And its not a boring place. All I care about is getting the car to accelerate to 100 mph as fast as possible. I could care less about going much faster. I've hit 140 numerous times and that's enough for me. I just want to be put into the seat and a high speed doesn't do that but getting to a high speed does.

And yes thanks for linking that article. HP is stated as just a measure of output of how much the motor makes. Nothing to do with its acceleration. And how fast it goes 0-60. Maybe go to school and take a few physics classes to learn stuff.

Were not talking about the math for Acceleration were talking about accelerating a car! It is impossible for a gasoline automotive engine to make 200hp and 600ft-lb of torque and if it could peak torque would at 1751 rpm to make only 200hp so it would not be out running a 500 hp 500ft-lbs of torque engine! If torque was what made a car go fast then how come Pro-stock engines have been taking about the same amount of torque for years and moving it up the rpm band to make more and more Horsepower and run quicker each time? (850ft-lb / 5252 X 7000 rpm = 1,132.9 HP)(850ft-lb / 5252 X 8000rpm = 1,294.74 HP)(850ft-lb / 5252 X 9000rpm = 1,456.59 Hp) Horsepower = They currently turn those 500ci engines over 11,000 rpm's!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueforce View Post
And its not a boring place. All I care about is getting the car to accelerate to 100 mph as fast as possible. I could care less about going much faster. I've hit 140 numerous times and that's enough for me. I just want to be put into the seat and a high speed doesn't do that but getting to a high speed does.
Obviously you didn't see that my car runs 0 to 100mph in 7.0 seconds I know first hand that will put you in the seat!
__________________
2013 2SS/RS L99/A6 Crystal Red Metallic Tincoat 12.76@108.98mph Bone Stock
12.46@111.19mph with New Era CAI & U/D Pulley
12.12 @ 114.16 after Stainless Power headers and no tune yet on stock P-Zero's!
12.007@ 115.20 With 18" Drag Radials - 11.93 @115.19 Added a PTB 11.76 @116.59 With Yank SS3200 Converter - 11.63 @116.52 After PI and Tuning 11.44 @118.75 New Best
10.72 @127.93 after heads and Cam and Yank SS3600
trw427ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 03:38 AM   #33
DaemonGPF
Redonkulous
 
DaemonGPF's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueforce View Post
Just an FYI, HP is not what accelerates you. Torque does. Acceleration is measured in meters per second per second or ms^2. Just like gravity is 9.82 ms^2. We measure it in ft-lbs of torque. Acceleration is the change in velocity which is not measured in HP. Either way, if you have a 200 HP 600ft-lb torque car vs a 500 HP 500 ft-lb car the 500hp car would lose the race. Assuming same vehicle same weight and same drag and all that. And yes as an engineer I know that 1hp = 746 watts. Europe measures their cars in watts usually. The reason top gear mentions HP a lot is because it has a huge american fan base.

And its not a boring place. All I care about is getting the car to accelerate to 100 mph as fast as possible. I could care less about going much faster. I've hit 140 numerous times and that's enough for me. I just want to be put into the seat and a high speed doesn't do that but getting to a high speed does.

And yes thanks for linking that article. HP is stated as just a measure of output of how much the motor makes. Nothing to do with its acceleration. And how fast it goes 0-60. Maybe go to school and take a few physics classes to learn stuff.


Different strokes for different folks. Come live out here in the southwest where roads carry straight on for hundreds of miles without sign of another living thing, or any stop lights with other cars to contend with. Top speed becomes more interesting than seeing how often you can get to 60mph faster than, well, absolutely no one around you.
DaemonGPF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 07:41 AM   #34
Blueforce
 
Blueforce's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buffalo, NY, United States
Posts: 161
It may be impossible for the car to have those statistics however the outcome would be what I said. And yes more RPM's would make the car go faster as you would be delivering more power because of faster rotations. However of that car which is probably putting out over 850 ft lbs at 11000 rpms at that point, would be faster. If that car could reach 1000 ft lbs of torque it would surely be tons faster.


I don't think I would be able to live out there. I don't like the heat much though I'm starting to want some here. Its still snowing. Perhaps someday I'll take a drive and experience the open roads. My particular want for acceleration obviously is an effect of my environment as well as yours for your environment. We also do not have a 1/4 mile track to race on, ours is an 1/8 mile. Such is life here in Buffalo.
Blueforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 09:10 AM   #35
grocerygetter
instigator
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 6.2 Trail Boss, 2022 XC90
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 72034
Posts: 3,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueforce View Post
It may be impossible for the car to have those statistics however the outcome would be what I said. And yes more RPM's would make the car go faster as you would be delivering more power because of faster rotations. However of that car which is probably putting out over 850 ft lbs at 11000 rpms at that point, would be faster. If that car could reach 1000 ft lbs of torque it would surely be tons faster.


I don't think I would be able to live out there. I don't like the heat much though I'm starting to want some here. Its still snowing. Perhaps someday I'll take a drive and experience the open roads. My particular want for acceleration obviously is an effect of my environment as well as yours for your environment. We also do not have a 1/4 mile track to race on, ours is an 1/8 mile. Such is life here in Buffalo.
you are still talking in a hypothetical world giving examples of a hypothetical hp/tq scenario.
and screwing up Terry's thread. We could all discuss this side bar in its own thread. Maybe a mod could pull all this BS out of his thread?
__________________
-John S.
grocerygetter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 03:36 PM   #36
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
That nonsense made my head hurt.

Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 05:42 PM   #37
DaemonGPF
Redonkulous
 
DaemonGPF's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueforce View Post
It may be impossible for the car to have those statistics however the outcome would be what I said. And yes more RPM's would make the car go faster as you would be delivering more power because of faster rotations. However of that car which is probably putting out over 850 ft lbs at 11000 rpms at that point, would be faster. If that car could reach 1000 ft lbs of torque it would surely be tons faster.


I don't think I would be able to live out there. I don't like the heat much though I'm starting to want some here. Its still snowing. Perhaps someday I'll take a drive and experience the open roads. My particular want for acceleration obviously is an effect of my environment as well as yours for your environment. We also do not have a 1/4 mile track to race on, ours is an 1/8 mile. Such is life here in Buffalo.
As someone who has lived in the New England area, the Southeast, and the Southwest - I'd be the first to say it's a totally different kind of heat. 100F out here is far more tolerable than 80F out there. NO humidity and a relative lack of bugs.
DaemonGPF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 09:31 PM   #38
MANNYS2SS/RS

 
MANNYS2SS/RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS,LS3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,237
Awesome numbers, Congrat's.
__________________

LS-3, ProCharger D1SC
665. rwhp /562. rwtq @ 9.3 psi
MANNYS2SS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2014, 11:27 PM   #39
Hott12SS
 
Hott12SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Georgetown, IL
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by VADER SS L99 View Post
This literally made me laugh out loud. Thank you, sir
Hott12SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 11:28 AM   #40
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueforce View Post
Just an FYI, HP is not what accelerates you. Torque does. Acceleration is measured in meters per second per second or ms^2. Just like gravity is 9.82 ms^2. We measure it in ft-lbs of torque. Acceleration is the change in velocity which is not measured in HP. Either way, if you have a 200 HP 600ft-lb torque car vs a 500 HP 500 ft-lb car the 500hp car would lose the race. Assuming same vehicle same weight and same drag and all that. And yes as an engineer I know that 1hp = 746 watts. Europe measures their cars in watts usually. The reason top gear mentions HP a lot is because it has a huge american fan base.

And its not a boring place. All I care about is getting the car to accelerate to 100 mph as fast as possible. I could care less about going much faster. I've hit 140 numerous times and that's enough for me. I just want to be put into the seat and a high speed doesn't do that but getting to a high speed does.

And yes thanks for linking that article. HP is stated as just a measure of output of how much the motor makes. Nothing to do with its acceleration. And how fast it goes 0-60. Maybe go to school and take a few physics classes to learn stuff.
I go 0-103.55 in 6.68 seconds. I make 50-60 more hp than tq. The right combo likes bigger hp.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 11:43 AM   #41
Shift_Rejected
2010 2SS RS
 
Shift_Rejected's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS RS (L99)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wilmington, DelaWHERE
Posts: 749


Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
That nonsense made my head hurt.

Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk
__________________
~ Build Thread | 371HP & 390 TQ
Performance Mods: K&N Cold Air Intake | Pypes Cat-Back Exhaust | Aluminum Paddle Shifters | VaraRam Wedge | Cross Drilled/Slotted Rotors | Hawk HPC Pads | M.M. Ported Throttle Body | Kooks 1 7/8 Headers w/ High Flow Cats | Dyno Tune @ RPM
Cosmetic Mods: Rally Stripes (style1, style2, style2.2) | Splitter | Painted Calipers | Door Projector Lights | Front-Emblem Delete | Cup Holder Lighting | Quarter Window Covers | Phantom Grille | Ghosted Side Markers | Tinted Fog Lights | ZL1 Rockers | Tail Light Bezels
Shift_Rejected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 12:01 PM   #42
Camarojt

 
Camarojt's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Allen, Tx
Posts: 2,202
May tha blueFORCE be with you! You will need it.
Camarojt is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.