![]() |
|
|
#113 |
|
Repeat after me....
Drives: 1969 Chevy Camaro Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 50
|
I personally think it looks good. But maybe a little too retro for this car? It's an updated version of a classic icon of American history.
I'd roll me a '77-'78 T/A with t-tops anyday. But I don't think it fits the new camaro very well. Not for it's theme.
__________________
- Jason
Death smiles at us all. All a man can do is smile back. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Moderator
Drives: '99 Camaro SS #1392 Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Newtown, Pa.
Posts: 3,982
|
There's been discussions on the "t-tops issue" here previously. (search button respectfully recommended for more info.
)Personally, I think they take away from the car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
|
They look good, but thinking of the possible leaks and rattles after the car ages turns me off to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Reality Check Specialist
|
new car crash standards FTL... aint gonna happen... move along, folks
__________________
got tequila?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i dont understand t-tops there are 2 tops
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
Sorry folks, no T's on modern cars - and no, it doesn't fall into the same category as a targa or convertable.
GM wants (and will get) 5 star side impact ratings for the Camaro, and you can't get that with a part of the roof missing and no curtain airbags. |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
to Z or not to Z
|
Some people do not count each removeable panel.......
just a bottom and the top: one each To get picky I might call it an H top.... t-top(s) is/are not apparently available..... ![]() How is it we can have a 'safe' strong convertable, but not a t-top(s)?
__________________
99 S-10 ZR2 06 GMC Z71 - - - sold... getting ready for my Camaro 02 Z28 - - - sold :( miss it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
Quote:
Convertables are classified differently now under the NHTSA guidlines than a coupe. Convertables are also engineered differently than their coupe counterparts. Back in the old days, even as recently as the 1985 Cadillac Eldorado, the convertable was just litterally a choped coupe. The 4th gen Fbods were substantially engineered as convertables from the ground up, as will the 5th gen Camaro. T-Tops would be classified as coupes, hence missing vital roof structure and curtain airbags. They would probably get a 2 or 1 star NHTSA safety rating, which would not be good when you want to sell the Camaro mass market. And no, GM could not make non T-toped Camaros with curtain airbags and a stonger roof design and get a sepparate rating. Doesn't work that way. BTW, one of the biggest contributing factors to the 4th gens demise was they could not meet 2003 impact protection guidelines - the low angle of the front windshield (and lack of capacity for curtain airbags) would have not only been a failure on every impact rating but actually been illegal to produce period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#121 | |
|
to Z or not to Z
|
Quote:
And to put the t-top on the convertable frame would cost more than a convertable, or at least as much....? that would make sense. :( no Ts
__________________
99 S-10 ZR2 06 GMC Z71 - - - sold... getting ready for my Camaro 02 Z28 - - - sold :( miss it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
![]() Drives: '68 327 RS, 2010 2SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Grapevine, Texas
Posts: 584
|
Yeah, I agree that it just wouldn't look right on the car for me. Although, if they offered them, I'm sure many would buy them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
I'm so Camarolicious!
Drives: '04 Honda Accord -_- Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 18
|
i love t-tops and i think it would look nice on the new camaro
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
![]() Drives: '10 Black 1SS/RS Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 358
|
i really like the t-top on a 3rd gen. i thought the 2nd gen looked funny with it. and i'm sorry, but i'm not a fan of the 4th gen body all together. my thoughts on the 5th gen... i really don't think i'd like it. it just looks funny when i picture it in my head. and i'm big on not dieing in a firey crash. if it doesn't meet safety standards i say don't do it.
__________________
VIN # 11879, 1SS/RS, born 5/22/2009.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
![]() Drives: 2000 Silverado 4.8 V8 Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 71
|
Who wants T-Tops on their SS Camaro's?
Wheres the T-Top
__________________
Automotive press asked Chevrolet product managers, "What is a Camaro?" and were told it was "a small, vicious animal that eats Mustangs."
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Snark snark snark
Drives: RX350 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 3L Hell
Posts: 555
|
__________________
What is this, CorvetteForum Lite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Message to all Fbody Enthusiasts | TAG UR IT | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 02-02-2013 08:41 PM |
| GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 08:33 PM |
| Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 08:05 PM |
| Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 05:38 PM |