![]() |
|
|
#99 | |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Quote:
...and we did hit the track last week. Viper TA was king there too and we had a lot of bad ass cars running. This is as close as I got and he probably lapped me before the session was over LOL.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 | |
![]() Drives: Buick Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 154
|
Quote:
What fantastic cars we have to choose from now compared to back then.. This is raising as much of a stir as the hot-rod mag dyno that showed the Firebird RWHP higher than the C5 Vette.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: some to distraction Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Quote:
The good thing about this one is there is no magazine or shop bias involved. The internet is just taking it and running wild. Pretty comical IMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
![]() Drives: Cadillac on four flats Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boondocks
Posts: 194
|
The Hellcat twins will be monsters doing roll races. Weight does not play to much of an factor when cars are already moving, so It should be an interesting match-up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
|
Quote:
Heavy cars can run fast. Look at the CTS-V, for example. Hellcat will have at least 120-150 rwhp more than a CTS-V. Kind of scary, haha. Tony |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: some to distraction Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 627
|
Quote:
Has any follow-up been done on this particular car to see what parameters were exceeded, and then what exactly the ECU does/doesn't do to compensate? It seems to me there's a golden opportunity, present, to diagnose, clarify and assist, instead of leaving the impression this is simply an overhyped engine. Last edited by SEVEN-OH JOE; 12-12-2014 at 03:10 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
Track > 1/4 Mile
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
![]() Drives: Buick Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 154
|
Quote:
Trap speeds for them seem lower than expected, a while back I had talked to someone close to SRT and they said the Hellcat Challenger was faster 60-140 than the Viper. I really think there is alot left in the Hellcat, SRT even said they tested at 825hp at one point. If tuners ever crack the PCM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
Quote:
http://www.corvetteforum.com/article...let-car-break/
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was reading an article today that said an insider at GM is claiming that there is countdown clock in the ECM that will cut power until the car is properly broken in. Not sure how that works but its an interesting pont of view and especially if the new Z06 has a 1,500 break in like our Camaros. Now I'm curious to see what happens once these cars get a few thousand miles on them.
http://www.corvetteforum.com/article...ak/?fbcorvette .
__________________
Todd in Vancouver
'14 ZL1 Camaro '67 Camaro SS Pro-tour in process How hard can it be... Check out my other build http://www.pro-touring.com/threads/9...ject-Obsession |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
|
The "conservative ECU" stuff is just an excuse that was deployed by ONE blog site, without any real proof. It might have also been taken out of context, as the original response was never posted in its entirety. Thus far, GM has not issued any official statement. The other bloggers simply latched on to that excuse of conservative ECU tuning, and ran with it. Anyone that knows anything about modern cars, will agree that EVERY vehicle built has a conservative factory tune. They have to leave room for error, and tune the cars to survive in all climates and elevation differences. They also have to tune for max 91 octane, as not every state gets 93.
The early dyno tests being done have proven that the C7Z06 is making its rated performance number, sometimes even higher than its rated hp. Even the cars losing 20 rwhp on the dyno from being hot, are still producing 650 crank hp. BTW, even Vipers pick up 30-40 rwhp from a basic custom tune. Like I said, every car has a conservative tune from the factory. Tony |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|