Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2015, 12:19 AM   #1
bgallegos
 
bgallegos's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 57
Another 5.0 thread

Well gentlemen this evening I met a guy with a 5.0. His mods are o/r exhaust and Lund tune. Mine are cam full exhaust,cai, tune. We did about 4 runs two from a 20,a 40 & 45. I pulled about a car on every run except the 40 for some reason. I Have to leave TC on due to the issue I've been having of it going into limp mode when it's off. I Know the 5.0s are fast I don't want to start a huge argument the way these threads usually go just wanted to share my experience with you guys lol. I'm a little disappointed that I didn't pull by more, but I really think I need to have my tuned looked at.
bgallegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 08:00 AM   #2
rontammy0
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/ RS INFERNO ORANGE L99
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Alliston Ontario Canada
Posts: 9,057
I think your right..i think u should win by a little more then 1 car. Im not sure about your tune..cant hurt to have a look
rontammy0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 08:27 AM   #3
mariojmoe
Account Suspended
 
Drives: C7 Z06 manual, 18 Zl1 manual, etc
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 1,488
Yes op with a cam, full bolt on's, and a tune you should take the victory vs a tune only 5.0. This was my exp when I raced a tune only 5.0 with my cammed ss. Now stock for stock is a different story.
mariojmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 09:20 AM   #4
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Tune only you should of pulled a way, full bolt on 5.0 you wouldn't stand a chance
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 11:07 AM   #5
87GNX

 
87GNX's Avatar
 
Drives: Alot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
This ^, I will say what is in his favor in particular is that Lund tune (its that good). If that was a bama tune you would pulled much more.
__________________
IF YOU AIN'T FIRST, YOU'RE LAST
87GNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 11:28 AM   #6
bgallegos
 
bgallegos's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 57
They were good runs I know o/r exhaust does a lot for them since they basically have shortys from the factory. I just didn't expect it to do that much hahahaha. He was probably right on my a$$ to the end.
bgallegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 12:41 PM   #7
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
My cammed 2010 ran a best of 12:20, I know there was more in the car but that is the best I got out of it on DRs, it had a mild cam that put 450-rwhp. I raced a few tuned/exhaust 5.0s also on DRs and they were solid into the 11s. I saw one crank out an 11:60. The 5.0s are pretty slow stock but minor mods really wake them up.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 01:04 PM   #8
87GNX

 
87GNX's Avatar
 
Drives: Alot
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Norcalifas
Posts: 1,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
My cammed 2010 ran a best of 12:20, I know there was more in the car but that is the best I got out of it on DRs, it had a mild cam that put 450-rwhp. I raced a few tuned/exhaust 5.0s also on DRs and they were solid into the 11s. I saw one crank out an 11:60. The 5.0s are pretty slow stock but minor mods really wake them up.
Slow stock? Maybe the stock tune sucks. They run anywhere from 12.5-13.x, not slow but I agree a GREAT tune + boltons = 11 sec car all day.
__________________
IF YOU AIN'T FIRST, YOU'RE LAST
87GNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 01:56 PM   #9
mariojmoe
Account Suspended
 
Drives: C7 Z06 manual, 18 Zl1 manual, etc
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 1,488
5.0's are not hardly slow stock lol. Now the 2015's are slower than the 13/14's and in stock form is a drivers race vs a stock ss. I guess the irs is the reason why idk. But yes those 13/14's with full bolt ons and a tune are no freaking joke.

I ran one with full bolt ons cj intake, and a tune (not sure which brand) oh and drag radials vs my untuned headers/exhaust C6Z on crappy stock Michelin sports. From a 40 roll he pulled away from me like a leer Jet, by the time I would hook and wind up 2nd into third I would pretty easily take the lead but of coarse he would let off by then lol.
mariojmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 02:00 PM   #10
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by 87GNX View Post
Slow stock? Maybe the stock tune sucks. They run anywhere from 12.5-13.x, not slow but I agree a GREAT tune + boltons = 11 sec car all day.
The best I got out of my 12 5.0 completely stock was 12:90s about the same as my SS, most stock 5.0s were in the low 13s. IMO 12:90s are pretty slow in the times we are living in.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 03:59 PM   #11
bgallegos
 
bgallegos's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 57
Well I had a 5.0 prior to my camaro also and I had paint issues with it which is why I got rid of it, and not to mention the horror stories about the MT82. They're great cars I'm not a fanboy dbag lol.
bgallegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 05:02 PM   #12
L99CAMA2011


 
L99CAMA2011's Avatar
 
Drives: One of the baddest handling Gen 5s
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Masachusetts
Posts: 4,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgallegos View Post
Well I had a 5.0 prior to my camaro also and I had paint issues with it which is why I got rid of it, and not to mention the horror stories about the MT82. They're great cars I'm not a fanboy dbag lol.
$3000 for a GT500 tranny swap solves that tranny issue. All Mustangs I looked had better paint than both my Camaros. Weird.
L99CAMA2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 11:42 PM   #13
bgallegos
 
bgallegos's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 57
The paint sure looks off to me
Attached Images
 
bgallegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 11:45 PM   #14
bgallegos
 
bgallegos's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by L99CAMA2011 View Post
$3000 for a GT500 tranny swap solves that tranny issue. All Mustangs I looked had better paint than both my Camaros. Weird.
Another angle others complained about the paint on the hoods bubbling and I saw another thread on a forum of a white one having the same issue as me.
Attached Images
 
bgallegos is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.