![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2011 V6 Camaro LT 1 RS Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 26
|
My goal is simple I want my 2011 camaro LT/RS to be 5 second 0-60. What would be the easiest way to get their with bolt ons, i.e. no turbos, superchargers, or anything like that. I can work with about 2 grand so keep that in mind.
Here is what i was thinking: Long Tube Headers Cat-Back (with x-pipe) (which kit is best?) Cold Air intake (which brand is best?) VMAX ICEOLATOR Vitesse Throttle Controller I have also seen threads stating that programmers are useless and that if your going to waste time with a tune to get a custom one on a dyno is this true or are their programmers that are worth a damn I don't think this will reach the 5 second mark will it? I am in Southern California @4,000 feet in elevation at my house and maybe 1000 at work if anyone wants to take that into account. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
603 Camaros
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
|
Quote:
Meh your budget is whats in your way for that goal. LT's will cost you anywhere from 300-1,000+ depending on the brand i'd suggest one with hi flows included for the extra HP/TQ. Most Cat Backs are expensive and everyone has their preference. I've still yet to see a decent comparison to all the cat backs available to a V6 camaro. You usually only see a comparison of 2 or 3 major brands. You'll get minimal performance from these honestly mostly sound. but the weight loss replacing the stock suitcases isn't a bad thing. Cold Air Intakes let's see you'll hear CAI Inc. from 70% of people 10% Injen and the rest is a mix. On the V6 they are all actually fairly decent Roto-Fab/Vararam/Airaid the only one i've heard issues from is the K&N with CEL's. Running the Roto-Fab myself and i like it it's very basic and does a great job. Your last two throttle controller and iceolator are a good starting point also tires and wheels may help depending on wether your intending to keep it a daily driver and drive in weather. As for programmers your perception thus far is a little warranted but not entirely. Please no one flame me i don't even have a tune on my car yet just going from what i've heard and read over the years on here. You will always get better results from a custom dyno tune because it's being customized to how your car runs not from a base understanding like the mail orders or handhelds. However with the 2011 you get the Bosch ECU bitch slap from GM. I've yet to hear concrete HP Tuners information just alot of testing and re-testing on here. Trifecta is basically done exclusively through bad news racing these days not neccasarily a bad thing to have a company do the leg work with trifecta. Your only other real option is the IPF Tune which from everything i've heard is rock solid. That being said IPF Tunes will not generally cause anything on your car to break those guys know your car better then you do probably and you may run into issues with a dyno tune causing excessive wear on components because simply put unlike an IPF or other Mail/Handheld tunes theirs no safety measures taken into consideration on how you drive your car with a dyno tune installed. I really do wish you the best of luck i think you are headed in the right direction and i'd start with the Iceolator, VTC and CAI and work your way into LT's, Hi Flows and Cat Backs as you go.
__________________
MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
|
Gears and if it an Auto, a very high stall torque converter. These engines make power at high RPM, get it there fast and keep it there. LFX intake manifold will do a better job than the ice-olator ever will, but more expensive.
Tune wise, the Bosch requires a huge learning curve to tune correctly. The best tuners for the Bosch ECU for the LNF engines were regular forum members that kept tinkering on their own car, learning the ins-and-out of the ECU. They are now helping LT1 tuners understand the benefits of Direct Injection now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
4,000 feet at your house? Dang....you'll never see 5 seconds there! lol. Joking....sort of.
My opinion....if you wan the car to be a consistent 5 second or less car...well that's not going to be easy or cheap. If you are ok with it being a consisten 5.xx second car (say mid 5s, more or less) well that's more doable. Leaving out gears, or tires/suspension I'd recommend: - Injen/CAI brand/Vararam intake - Manifold spacer, such as Black Ice or MACE - IPF tune (unless you can find a local tuner that actually has experience tuning the LLT. if they don't have experience, its a no go) - If you don't want to tune, then try the throttle controller, but I'm not sure I completely trust that thing. That alone should get you into the 5s on a good launch. Past that: - headers/exhaust. Headers will add power. Mufflers won't really. - Consider sticker street tires....Nittos? To be a consistently easy low 5 or sub-5 second car I think you'll need gears (which will basically require a whole new rear end if you are auto) or perhaps a stall. You could go with a shorter tire/wheel setup, which would simulate lower gears without actually doing them. To give you an idea on my LLT. I had most bolt ons, but no tire/gear/suspension mods and my testing usually resulted in mid to high 5s.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 2011 V6 Camaro LT 1 RS Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 26
|
Honestly I might just buy a V8, my car is paid for and i figure i can get 15-20k for it, im leaning towards a 2016 2SS. Get my work to pay for the difference because it will be a "sales vehicle"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Silver Ice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 866
|
This. Suping up a v6 is like titts on a bull...
__________________
2015 SS/RS/1LE
HSA delete, VMAX throttle body, CAI inc. Intake, PRC255 heads, BTR 660 springs, BTR cryo-treated rockers, PAT G 232/240 .654/.626 110+2, johnson 2110's, Manton 502 pushrods, C5R, Melling high volume/high pressure, Powerbond 25% underdrive pulley, Proform covers, Kooks stepped headers, catless mids, Doug Thorley exhaust. 512rwhp, 446rwtq on a mustang dyno, tuned by Cunningham motorsports. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Modern V6s are much different than the ones most people remember. When they can handle 650 RWHP by only changing rods and piston, there is definitely a lot of potential.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
|
Nothing wrong with deciding to just save up for a V8!
Disagree. Nothing wrong with modding a V6, especially modern ones. you just have to set expectations. I modded mine and loved it. Sure, it didn't have V8 HP, but it still pulled great, had great throttle response, and made me happy every time I drove it. The new 6th gen V6 should be a great platform to begin with being much lighter and more nimble than the 5th gen. Starting with 335 HP, bolt ons a tune should yield an easy 350 - 360 HP. With that kind of HP, and the weight, they will have an equal or slightly better HP to weight ratio than the current SS automatic. That's something to think about. Right on.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT RS, 2009 GTR Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,559
|
Quote:
I disagree. I own two V6 vehicles a Camaro and a GTR. Performance wise extremely different but I love both. Modding a car, is about the journey and what you get out of it. As long as you have fun along the way and enjoy the car it's all good. Quote:
Quote:
And to the OP whatever makes you look back at the car when you walk away from it, be it a modded V6 or a new SS, you know you made the right decision.
__________________
Build thread: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=152335
Photos: www.flickr.com/bradbeer GTR Instagram: @NoCrustGTR |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
and what's wrong with a tits on a bull..........best of both worlds. I have enjoyed every minute of my suping up a V6. Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Never just fly under the radar Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,531
|
Quote:
Such a blast Love it!
__________________
1-8-4-3-6-5-7-2
Old Skool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
I will pass along what I did. Cold Air Inductions CAI, IPF tune, and 3.91 gears. I have a manual so the gear change was easy. Tuned for 93.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 0-60, quarter mile |
|
|