Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2015, 01:54 AM   #1
Tzarro
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 33
2012 L99 LSA Supercharger - Almost No Power Gain

Hello all,

I recently purchased an LSA Stage 1 conversion kit from Andy over at ADM Performance, and upon completing the installation took it to Alex and his crew over at Carburetor Connection in Kirkland, WA for dyno tuning.

Prior to installation of the supercharger, I had a set of long tubes, a cold air intake, and a tune making 378whp on a Dynojet. Now, with the supercharger on and running about 5 - 6 psi, the highest we could get it was 411whp. The latest stable tune put down 391whp as seen in the dyno sheet. There was some misfiring in the higher RPMs, so I had the shop put in some ZR1 spark plugs to see if they could get anything more out of it as the issue seemed to be ignition-related. Seemed to help with the misfires, but no more power. Pressure tested the supercharger manifold and verified there were no leaks. Thought high-flow cats might be problematic, but running straight headers on the dyno also had little to no effect.

I am running the 52 lb/hr stock LSA injectors that came with the kit, but have retained the stock SS fuel pump. The fuel trims looked good up until around 5k RPM in 4th gear where the car started to get fuel starved. Although problematic, Alex didn't think this should account for the lack of power in the lower RPMs, where there was still practically no gain over my prior NA setup.

Andy, Alex and I are currently going back and forth trying to determine why I am getting a fraction of the power I should be, but in the meantime I figured I'd drop by here to see if anyone had any other ideas. I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps the fuel pump is the source of my issue. I've done my share of reading on this forum and have heard that even if the fuel trims look good that it's still possible the engine is getting fuel starved by the pump being inadequate and the injectors working overtime to compensate. This seems to make sense for the starvation issue in the higher RPMs we noticed, but could this account for the lack of power elsewhere? My shop brought in a tuning specialist to get a second pair of eyes on the situation, and he said that the tune looks good and should easily be making around 50whp more than it is.

Both Andy and Alex have been amazing to work with and have really gone (and continue to go) the extra mile to try and help me get to the bottom of this. However, I know there is also a wealth of knowledge and experience spread out among the members here, so any additional input on the matter would be much appreciated!

On the dyno sheet below, blue is the NA tune from earlier this year and red is the most recent run with my supercharger:
Attached Images
 
Tzarro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 05:44 AM   #2
bayarea408

 
bayarea408's Avatar
 
Drives: T
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 805
SS fuel pump?

Hows the belt drive assembly?

any upgrades to valve train?

have you compression tested the cylinders?
bayarea408 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 07:25 AM   #3
ADM PERFORMANCE
 
Drives: Anything I want
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: DfW - Texas
Posts: 5,407
Post up picks of the engine bay,Lets get a visual on whats under the hood.

I want to see the Intake setup and install as well as the belt routing etc.
ADM PERFORMANCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 10:09 AM   #4
GenF-GTS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: none
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 571
Have you checked the bypass valve to make sure it is closing 100%
GenF-GTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 12:15 PM   #5
RealQuick
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6 - Intake/Exhaust
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenF-GTS View Post
Have you checked the bypass valve to make sure it is closing 100%
That was my first thought, second thought is belt slip.
RealQuick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 12:46 PM   #6
sscamaro


 
Drives: 2010 2SS, 2017 Silverado LTZ
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver,PA
Posts: 3,195
Check mods in sig. 546/rwhp. ZL/1 fuel pump and 72# injectors.
sscamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 01:15 PM   #7
NOLA_1LE
 
NOLA_1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 90
I have a ZL1 pump that I just pulled out of my 8k mile 1LE if your interested?
__________________
2013 1LE Inferno Orange 848hp 836tq
TSP Forged 376ci motor w/ 1/2" Head Studs and PRC 260cc heads, F1-R Procharger Cog Drive w/ Race Intercooler, Fore Fuel System, ID1000's, Alky Meth Kit, Mantic 9000, Borla LT and CAT back ATAK
Pfadt: Lowering Springs, Rear Trailing Arms and Tie Rods, Rear Drag Sway Bar, Rear Upper and Lower Control Arm Bushings, Solid Sub Frame Bushings, Front Spherical Trailing Arm Bushings, Front Lower Control Arm Bushings
Barton Short Throw Shifter, AEM Boost and Wideband Gauges w/ A Pillar Pod, VIS CF Terminator Hood, and ZL1 CF spoiler
NOLA_1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 01:24 PM   #8
hammdo
'It's an experiment'
 
hammdo's Avatar
 
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,709
Wow, that is off. Agree need to see the bay and belt routing. I'm an 11 L99, 6 PSI stock LSA injectors and pulley, ported heads, VVT cam and I'm 590 RWHP. I do have the ZL1 fuel pump and ADM FPCM...
I have on my build thread that shows the belt routing and the boost valve adjustment...

-Don
__________________
747 RWHP 794 RWTQ
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." - Enzo Ferrari
See My Build: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385577

Last edited by hammdo; 11-15-2015 at 01:35 PM.
hammdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 03:13 PM   #9
Tzarro
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 33
Thanks for the replies everyone!

hammdo, I used your build thread as one of my primary references throughout this process. Thank you for your thorough documentation. I found the section you mentioned about the boost valve adjustment. I don't have the adjustment tool but I will order it if necessary. I did come across another thread a while back that addressed this; i assume it refers to the same calibration? Can it be done without the tool?

http://www.ctsvowners.com/forum/93-t...ass-valve.html

The belt I have on the car right now is the one recommended on ADMs website. It took a lot of wrangling to get it on and it felt SUPER tight so I ordered a slightly longer belt. However, having run the recommended for about a week now, the tensioner adjustment indicators appear to be within the proper range as indicated in one of the pictures below, so I'm sticking with it for the time being and keeping the slightly longer one I purchased as a backup.

Throughout the tuning process Alex said he did not see or hear any indication of belt slip at all, so he felt it was safe to rule that one out.

Valvetrain is stock and I do not believe he tested the compression.

As far as checking the bypass valve to ensure it is closing 100%, can that be done without removing the intake/supercharger lid and looking? Can I just disconnect the actuator arm and see if it moves back into the closed position any further and then adjust the controller mounting accordingly?

Hammdo, I noticed in your build thread that you said the bosch intercooler pump could not be mounted upside down (like I have in my picture), but that is how I have it mounted and it seems to be operating fine...will this damage the pump? Is it vital that I reorient it?

Lastly, I just remembered that during my install to make room for the intercooler I disconnected the OAT sensor and left it off. Other than the reading it gives you for your own benefit on the display, does this sensor do anything for the tuning/engine itself?

Thanks again for all of the input, and NOLA_1LE, thanks for the offer on the pump. I will need to upgrade from the SS pump I have now at some point so I'll keep you updated.














Last edited by Tzarro; 11-15-2015 at 03:36 PM.
Tzarro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 04:27 PM   #10
hammdo
'It's an experiment'
 
hammdo's Avatar
 
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,709
If that is the current setting for the boost bypass, that is way to wide open. It should be just a fraction on the set screw. If that is not closing, you're leaking boost. If you see mine, even without the tool, you can get it close. You'll need to loosen the bolts on the boost valve and make sure the arm is not pulling the valve open, which it looks like it is.

The pump does not need to be reoriented . It appears to be upright

I'd correct the boost bypass valve and make sure it's set correctly.

PM me if you need anything...

-Don
__________________
747 RWHP 794 RWTQ
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." - Enzo Ferrari
See My Build: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385577

Last edited by hammdo; 11-15-2015 at 05:01 PM.
hammdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 04:41 PM   #11
hammdo
'It's an experiment'
 
hammdo's Avatar
 
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,709
Mine:



Yours:



I bet boost is bleeding off...

-Don
__________________
747 RWHP 794 RWTQ
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." - Enzo Ferrari
See My Build: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385577
hammdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 05:09 PM   #12
Tzarro
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 33
Hey Don, thanks for the input on that. I found the portion of your install that went over that so I went out and tried adjusting it. I haven't done anything with the adjustment screw but I did ensure that the orientation of the boost bypass had the actuator at its default closed position - it would not move any further back. At this point I tightened down the bolts while doing my best to position the adjustment screw just a fraction away from the bracket on the arm as shown below.

I'll have to get to the pump tonight or tomorrow as I will need to come up with a way to drain all of the coolant and fabricate new hoses to ensure proper routing to the pump's new position.

Thanks again.



Tzarro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 06:22 PM   #13
hammdo
'It's an experiment'
 
hammdo's Avatar
 
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,709
If the pump inlet is facing up, your good...
Originally, my inlet on the pump was facing the ground and that was a no no...

Yours looks fine..

Keep us posted! Pm me if you way to talk on the phone...

-Don
__________________
747 RWHP 794 RWTQ
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." - Enzo Ferrari
See My Build: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385577
hammdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2015, 06:37 PM   #14
hammdo
'It's an experiment'
 
hammdo's Avatar
 
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,709
Looks like its still too far away. You need it to be closer to the set screw. I physically hold the valve shut loosen the bolts again and try to adjust the vacuum switch so the set screw kisses the arm on the valve. That will get you close. Then adjust the set screw 1/4 turn in. Do that until you get the tool...

-Don
__________________
747 RWHP 794 RWTQ
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." - Enzo Ferrari
See My Build: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385577
hammdo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.