Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-08-2015, 07:49 PM   #1
Nate76
 
Nate76's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 2SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 96
Downshifting LS3

I was wondering if downshifting burned fuel. Firstly, I don't really care if it does- I didn't buy the SS for fuel efficiency, however I'm curious. So let's say I'm driving and slow down from highway speed. Press the clutch and put it in third, let the clutch out and the rpms go up to the 3500 range. My foot is off the gas, it's only my prior speed that caused the engine to rev that high. Is this burning gas at a higher rate or just at an idle rate? If it's not burning gas what making that beautiful, loud sound coming out of the exhaust as the engine slows??
Nate76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 07:55 PM   #2
paul84043

 
paul84043's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 2SS RS 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lehi, Utah
Posts: 1,349
Not really. The EFI doesn't demand fuel delivery unless the throttle sensor is asking for it.
It's probably not even burning it at the idle rate, most engines with the instantaneous readout will go to some high value.
Even carbureted engines only deliver the gas the foot pedal or Idle stop is asking for.
Whether or not it shuts off completely probably varies by manufacturer..

Engines with direct injection have even finer control.. Some of the TDI diesels have injectors so fine they can actually release a set number of fuel molecules..
paul84043 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 07:56 PM   #3
NC_SS

 
NC_SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 M6 Camaro SS (RIP)
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,684
Fuel and air are probably in the equation, but I'm not an engineer

Easy answer is probably. I don't think revving your engine higher helps MPG's lol
NC_SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 07:59 PM   #4
paul84043

 
paul84043's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 2SS RS 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lehi, Utah
Posts: 1,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_SS View Post
Fuel and air are probably in the equation, but I'm not an engineer

Easy answer is probably. I don't think revving your engine higher helps MPG's lol
But he's not revving it.. he's downshifting.. Different animal..
paul84043 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 08:00 PM   #5
NC_SS

 
NC_SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 M6 Camaro SS (RIP)
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul84043 View Post
But he's not revving it.. he's downshifting.. Different animal..
right, like I said I'm no engineer

idgaf about MPG's in my SS lol
NC_SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 08:07 PM   #6
rebelyell22


 
rebelyell22's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul84043 View Post
But he's not revving it.. he's downshifting.. Different animal..
I think he means rev matching
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
rebelyell22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 08:18 PM   #7
Spec
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS LS3
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 4,018
Higher RPM burns more fuel than lower RPM. Your engine goes through more cycles in a minute obviously at higher RPM than at lower RPM... thus burning more fuel measure on a timeline... even if you don't press on the pedal, its still needs to spray more fuel into the cylinders to maintain the higher rpm... I think, lol... I'm no mechanical engineer either...
Spec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 08:44 PM   #8
Irace16
 
Irace16's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS RS M6
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Appleton, Wisconsin
Posts: 521
I know for sure a carbureted engine pulls fuel at high rpm while not on the throttle. I believe vacuum pulls it. That's why some race cars have a flame out the exhaust in the middle of a corner. That said I have no idea if that happens with fuel injection
__________________
Vararam intake, gmpp exhaust, borla stainless long tubes, cat less, jannetty tune, bmr lowering springs, heritage grill , smoked lenses
Irace16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 08:46 PM   #9
Revrider550
 
Revrider550's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 1SS/RS
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 104
If your car revved up because of the syncros in the transmission and the fuel delivery didn't pick up accordingly I'd assume it would lean out. So yes it dumps in more fuel when it revs up or there would be a lot more burnt down manual camaros out there.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Revrider550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 10:13 PM   #10
havelegs

 
havelegs's Avatar
 
Drives: 24 LT1 M
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: North/Central FL
Posts: 1,121
Still needs fuel to get those rpms up and keep the engine running.
__________________
24 LT1 M6 Sharkskin Metallic
22 Mazda CX-30
havelegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2015, 12:51 AM   #11
Nor Cal ZL1

 
Nor Cal ZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 M6
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,825
Downshifting and not touching the throttle will use no more fuel than at idle. The throttle plate is closed so essentially no fuel is needed at all. Back when I raced mechanical injected cars there was a fuel cut off solenoid that dropped all fuel flow to the injectors until 1200 RPM. So from 7500 rpm down to 1200 no fuel was injected at all when decelerating.
Nor Cal ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2015, 01:19 AM   #12
two_wheel_mayhem
Would rather be riding
 
two_wheel_mayhem's Avatar
 
Drives: No car no more
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,750
They decel pop when you left off the gas, what's that tell you? There is no fuel being put into the engine when you are at 0% throttle position and the vehicle is moving.

The speed sensor tell the ECM when the car is not moving and it's time to idle. Therefore, coasting or engine braking burns less fuel than idling.
__________________
No dog in this fight anymore.
5th Gen owner 2009-2016.
two_wheel_mayhem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2015, 01:50 AM   #13
Bodywerks

 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 866
This is why you don't ask this type of question in the general forum...
__________________
2015 SS/RS/1LE
HSA delete, VMAX throttle body, CAI inc. Intake, PRC255 heads, BTR 660 springs, BTR cryo-treated rockers, PAT G 232/240 .654/.626 110+2, johnson 2110's, Manton 502 pushrods, C5R, Melling high volume/high pressure, Powerbond 25% underdrive pulley, Proform covers, Kooks stepped headers, catless mids, Doug Thorley exhaust. 512rwhp, 446rwtq on a mustang dyno, tuned by Cunningham motorsports.
Bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2015, 02:48 AM   #14
FunkedOut
 
FunkedOut's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2010 SS
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 447
DFCO = deceleration fuel cut off
You are injecting zero fuel until the rpms drop very low.
FunkedOut is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
down shifting, ls3, rev


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.